Improving the Procedure of Monitoring the Higher Education Quality in Ukraine

Viacheslav Vasiliievich Abroskin; Olga Ivanivna Demenko; Olena Mykolayivna Mykolenko; Yurij Mykolaiovych Frolov

doi:10.34069/AI/2020.26.02.35

Viacheslav Vasiliievich Abroskin Odessa State University of Internal Affairs https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4062-8105
Olga Ivanivna Demenko Department of Pedagogy and Foreign Philology of Semen Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0244-9218
Olena Mykolayivna Mykolenko Department of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics of Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2080-413X
Yurij Mykolaiovych Frolov Department of Jurisprudence of the Berdyansk State Pedagogical University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8737-6091

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.26.02.35

Keywords: Monitoring, education quality, administrative procedure, legal framework, higher education.

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to study the monitoring of higher education quality in Ukraine and to develop certain directions for improving its procedure. The authors have used the following scientific methods: dialectical, logical-legal, structural-functional, formal-logical modeling, analysis and synthesis. Based on research results, the main directions for improvement of monitoring procedure of higher education quality are outlined. The concept and features of monitoring as an administrative procedure in the field of higher education are defined. The general principles, main tasks and functions of monitoring the higher education quality are highlighted. The selected provisions of legal regulatory acts which declare the need to promote an adequate level of higher education quality, its monitoring and evaluation are presented. It is asserted that nowadays there is actually no system of monitoring higher education quality in Ukraine. Regarding the analysis of current legislation provisions of Ukraine in the field of higher education, as well as accepted scientific approaches to determining the implementation structure of monitoring procedure of higher education quality, three of its general phases are distinguished. These phases are as follows. I. Preparatory phase, which involves the implementation of a series of appropriate actions, combined into the following main stages: initiating the monitoring procedure; monitoring planning; development of monitoring technology. II. Practical phase, which includes the following main stages: preparation of selected research participants; conducting research. III. Analytical phase, consisting of the following stages: information processing; recommendations development; adjustment and control; research results publishing. It is indicated that each of these phases is a relatively independent and complete part of the procedure, which in turn consists of certain stages, each of which fulfills the corresponding intermediate purposes directed at solving the tasks of this administrative procedure phase.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Viacheslav Vasiliievich Abroskin, Odessa State University of Internal Affairs

PhD in Law, Rector of Odessa State University of Internal Affairs

Olga Ivanivna Demenko, Department of Pedagogy and Foreign Philology of Semen Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics.

PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Pedagogy and Foreign Philology of Semen Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics.

Olena Mykolayivna Mykolenko, Department of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics of Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University

Doctor of Jurisprudence, Assistant professor, Professor of the Department of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics of Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University

Yurij Mykolaiovych Frolov, Department of Jurisprudence of the Berdyansk State Pedagogical University

Doctor of Jurisprudence, Professor, Professor of Department of Jurisprudence of the Berdyansk State Pedagogical University

References

Annenkova, I. P. (2010). Monitoring the quality of education at HEI. Higher education in Ukraine. Annex 4, Volume II (20). Thematic issue "Higher education of Ukraine in the context of integration into the European educational space, 404-413.

Babin, I. I., Grinevich, L. M., Likarchuk, I. L. and others (2011). Analytical report on the state of education quality monitoring in Ukraine / ICO «Center of testing technology and education quality monitoring» // for the total. ed I. L. Likarchuk. K.: ICO «Center of testing technology and education quality monitoring». X.: Fact, 96 p.

Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated 25.08.2004 No. 1095 (revised in July 8, 2015 № 533). External independent evaluation procedure and education quality monitoring. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/533-2015-%D0%BF.

Decree of the President of Ukraine dated 17.04.2002 No. 347/2002. On the national doctrine of educational development. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/347/2002.

Decree of the President of Ukraine dated 20.03.2008 No. 244/2008. On additional measures to improve the quality of education in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/244/2008.

Decree of the President of Ukraine dated 30.09.2010 No. 926/2010. On measures to ensure the priority development of education in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/926/2010.

Decree of the President of Ukraine: dated 04.07.2005 No. 1013/2005. On urgent measures to ensure the functioning and development of education in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/view/MUS3463.

Decree of the President of Ukraine: dated 25.06.2013 No. 344/2013. About the national strategy for the development of education in Ukraine until 2021. Retrieved from http://www.president.gov.ua/documents/15828.html.

Gromova, T. (2006). Criteria and assessments of the quality of education. School director, 51-55.

Korotkiy, H. I., Atamanuk, U. A., Doroshenko, U. O. (2010). Quality management of higher education and the formation of an environmentally conscious personality. Bulletin of KNU named after T. Shevchenko. Series “Philosophy. Politology”, 94-96, 77-83.

Lukina, T. O. (2008). Monitoring in education. Education Encyclopedia / Chap. ed. V. G. Cremin. K.: Yurinom Inter, 519-521.

Lyashenko, A. I. (2007). Organizational and methodological bases of monitoring quality of education. Pedagogy and psychology, 2, 34-40.

Mayorov, A. N. (2005). Monitoring in education. M.: Intellect Center, 424 p.

Nelovkina Bernal, O. A. (2009). Technology of organization and conducting quality monitoring. Bulletin of LNU named after T. Shevchenko. Pedagogical sciences, 23 (186), 112-118.

Pasichnik, N. O. (2013). Monitoring the quality of education as a comprehensive assessment of educational process. KSPU Scientific notes. Series: Pedagogical sciences, 121, 50-55.

Prikhodko, I. P. (2013). Public administration measures for quality assurance, reproduction and transfer of knowledge in higher education. Coll. abstracts IV International Education Forum "Personality in a single educational space" (April 11-26). No. 1 «Theoretical and applied questions of modern educational management» http://www.zoippo.zp.ua/pages/el_gurnal/pages/vip11.html.

Schogoleva, L. O. (2014). Monitoring the quality of education: theoretical and methodological aspect. Pedagogical research, 2 (82), 36-40.

The 2010–2014 economic reform programme «Wealthy society, competitive economy, efficient state»: Program from 02.06.2010. Retrieved from http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/n0004100-10.