Apoio do governo ao desenvolvimento do empreendedorismo social: aspecto institucional e metodológico
Palavras-chave:
Empreendedorismo social, instituições, apoio governamental, regulação legal, abordagem sistemática.Resumo
O artigo considera a essência do conceito de empreendedorismo social, levando em conta as abordagens dos pesquisadores nacionais e estrangeiros, reflete a retrospectiva desse conceito. A fim de estudar os aspectos institucionais e metodológicos do apoio governamental do empreendedorismo social na Rússia, as abordagens para a análise do conceito de empreendedorismo social são estudadas. As características dos principais participantes do instituto de empreendedorismo social são dadas, também as prioridades da política de Estado no campo das organizações sem fins lucrativos socialmente orientadas e regulação legal desta esfera são consideradas. No decurso da análise do quadro jurídico de regulação do empreendedorismo social na Rússia, revela-se a oportunidade de fixar o conceito de “empreendedorismo social” a nível legislativo e o mecanismo do seu funcionamento.
Downloads
Referências
DiMaggio, P.J. (1988). Interest and agency ininstitutional theory. Zucker 33. L.G. (ed.). Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment, 3–22.
Eremeev, E.I. (2018). Mechanisms of spatial development of the north on the basis of industrial and raw sites and industrial clusters. Modern economy success, 2, 9-14.
Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40 (4), 397–405.
Islamutdinov, V.F. (2016). Evolution and specificity of the economic institutions of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug – Yugra. Economy of the region, 2, 463-470.
Islamutdinov, V.F. (2016). Institutions of stimulating the innovative behavior of economic agents in Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug – Yugra: Evolution, specificity and institutional traps. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6, 88-94.
Kuznetsov, A.O., Ignatyeva, T.A., Kuznetsov, A.O. (2018). Strategy and key components of competitiveness development. Modern economy success, 1, 25-28.
Mandritsa, I.V., Selleri, S., Mandritsa, O.V., Petrenko, V.I. (2016). Mechanism of economic security relativelly to market agents on possible leaks of business information. Modern economy success, 1, 19-31.
Mukhin, A.V. (2011). Evolution of the concept of social entrepreneurship. The main functions of social entrepreneurship (reviewed) [Text] / A.V. Mukhin // New technologies. 2. P. 103 - 106.
Naumenko, O.N., Naumenko, E.A. (2018). The Ob Ugrians-Muslims: Historical and Psychological Factors of the Islam Penetration in the Traditional Culture. Bylye Gody, 49 (3), 931-939.
Prasolov, V.I., Mosime, K. (2017). The risk-oriented model of economic security of a business entity. Modern economy success, 1, 4-10.
Takmasheva, I.V. (2012). Infrastructure transformation as a form of support of small business development on the territory of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous district ,Economics and entrepreneurship. 6. P. 382-385.
Takmash?va, I.V., Lebedeva, I.D., Sannikov, D.V.,Tashlaniva, Y.V. (2018). Study of parameters characterizing formation of business environment in the northern regions in the context of innovation-driven economy. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 17 (4), 1-7.
Zhokhova, V.V. (2015). Social entrepreneurship: essence and concept [Text], Proceedings of Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU). Economics and management. 1. P. 85-98.
Downloads
.gif)
