Vol. 8 Núm. 23 (2019)
Articles

Desafíos actuales de involucrar a expertos en procesos penales por delitos económicos en Ucrania

Iryna Hloviuk
Department of Criminal Process, National University “Odessa Law Academy”, Ukraine
Biografía del autor/a

Doctor of Laws, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Process, National University “Odessa Law Academy”, Ukraine

Volodymyr Hryniuk
Department of Justice, Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, Ukraine
Biografía del autor/a

Doctor of Laws, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Justice, Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, Ukraine

Serhii Kovalchuk
Department of Criminal Process and Criminalistics of Ivano-Frankivsk Law Institute, National University “Odessa Law Academy”, Ukraine
Biografía del autor/a

Doctor of Laws, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Process and Criminalistics of Ivano-Frankivsk Law Institute, National University “Odessa Law Academy”, Ukraine

Publicado 2019-10-11

Palabras clave

  • Principio adversario; nombramiento de auditorías e inspecciones; Código de Procedimiento Penal; delitos económicos; contratación de un experto; examen forense.

Cómo citar

Hloviuk, I., Hryniuk, V., & Kovalchuk, S. (2019). Desafíos actuales de involucrar a expertos en procesos penales por delitos económicos en Ucrania. Amazonia Investiga, 8(23), 378–385. Recuperado a partir de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/881

Resumen

El significado vital para probar que se está cometiendo un delito económico tiene el uso de conocimientos específicos, por ejemplo, en forma de examen forense, como lo demuestra el hecho de que el compromiso de un experto para la determinación de daños en los procesos penales es obligatorio. En los procesos penales por delitos económicos en virtud de la normativa procesal penal vigente, al comienzo del proceso penal es imposible designar legalmente la auditoría o inspección, lo que cuestiona la legalidad de la realización del examen forense; Esto requiere ser corregido a nivel regulatorio. El propósito del documento es la sistematización de la especificidad de los motivos y el patrón de participación de un experto en procedimientos penales con respecto a delitos económicos bajo el patrón renovado de la participación de expertos. La metodología del estudio consistió en métodos filosóficos, científicos generales y específicos de conocimiento científico. En particular, es un método sistemático de análisis funcional, histórico y legal, métodos regulatorios formales y lógicos. Implicaciones prácticas. Se sugirió que se indicara en la ley de procedimiento penal, respectivamente, para la parte acusadora, un derecho a exigir que se designe la auditoría e inspección, para la parte defensora, la obligación de ordenar la auditoría e inspección como un medio separado para reunir y controlar las pruebas. Por lo tanto, en el Código de Procedimiento Penal de Ucrania se debe indicar un precepto, obligando a las partes a indicar en las peticiones a un experto que debe ser contratado, o una autoridad experta que debe llevar a cabo el examen, y el juez de instrucción - para fundamentar su decisión sobre indicar otro, se indica en la petición, un experto que debe participar o una autoridad experta que debe realizar el examen.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Appellate Court of the Kyiv City (ACKC). (2018). Decision (criminal proceeding), dated June 6, 2018. Ukraine. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/74630510

Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (CMU). (2011). Order: Approval of fees for calculating the amount of compensation for damage caused by the illicit extraction (collection) or destruction of valuable aquatic bioresources, dated November 21, 2011, No 1209. URL: http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/KP111209.html

Cassation Criminal Court of Supreme Court (CCCSC). (2018a). Resolution in case No 326/672/17, dated November 1, 2018. Ukraine. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/77654078

Cassation Criminal Court of Supreme Court (CCCSC). (2018b). Resolution in case No 477/2255/16-k, dated June 7, 2018. Ukraine. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/74598723

Cassation Criminal Court of Supreme Court (CCCSC). (2018c). Resolution in case No 562/2333/15-k, dated October 25, 2018. Ukraine. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/77586813

Cassation Criminal Court of Supreme Court (CCCSC). (2018d). Resolution in case No 569/12438/15-k, dated September 12, 2018. Ukraine. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/76536331

Cassation Criminal Court of Supreme Court (CCCSC). (2018e). Resolution in case No 697/1276/15-k, dated October 25, 2018. Ukraine. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/78011558

Great Chamber of Supreme Court (GChSC). (2018). Resolution in case No 243/6674/17-k, dated May 23, 2018. Ukraine. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/74475959

Arbeláez, C.D., Correa Cruz, L., & Silva Silva, J. (2014). Un Acercamiento a los Desarrollos Investigativos en la Auditoría Forense. Tendencias, 14(2), 216-230. URL: http://revistas.udenar.edu.co/index.php/rtend/article/view/1647

Hloviuk, I., Torbas, O. (2018). New order for attracting an expert due to the Criminal procedure code of Ukraine: achievements and miscounts. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii prokuratury Ukrainy, 2(54), 97-108.

Kaplina, O.V. (2016). Appointment of audit by the investigator, prosecutor: disparity between legislation and case law. Ostroh: ONU.

Kherson Town Court (KhTC). (2018). Decision in case No 766/878/18, dated March 14, 2018. Ukraine. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/72783829

Kyiv District Court of the Poltava City (KDCPC). (2018). Decision in case No 552/673/18, dated February 6, 2018. Ukraine. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/72013751

Ladyzhyn District Court (LadDC). (2018). Decision in case No 135/351/18, dated July 10, 2018. Ukraine. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/75244642

Lokachynskiy District Court (LocDC). (2018). Decision in case No 155/1221/18, dated August 28, 2018. Ukraine. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/76106469

Ministry of Justice of Ukraine (MJU). (1998). Order: Instruction on appointment and conducting of forensic examinations and expert investigation, dated October 8, 1998, No 53/5. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98?find=1&text=%EF%E5%F0%E5%E2%B3%F0%EA#w112

Nehanov, V.V. (2018). Use of inspection conclusion in criminal proceedings. (Thesis PhD), National academy of internal affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Pohoretskiy, M.A., Vakulyk, O.O., Serheeva, D.B. (2015). Investigation of economic crimes. Kyiv: Dakor.

Sambir Town District Court of Lviv City (STDCLC). (2018). Decision in case No 452/3340/17, dated March 12, 2018. Ukraine. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/72663243

Shapoval, O.V. (2017). Criminalistics provision of investigation of economic crimes. (Thesis PhD), Kyiv National University named Tarasa Shevchenka, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Shaputko, S.V. (2018). Power of investigating judge in criminal proceedings regarding judicial control. (Thesis PhD), Kyiv National University named Tarasa Shevchenka, Kyiv, Ukraine

Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv City (ShDCKC). (2018). Decision in case No 761/34547/18, dated September 26, 2018. Ukraine. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/76983376

Starenkiy, O.S. (2017). Legislative innovations of the procedural order of the carrying out of separate investigative actions as the instrumentality of getting of evidences in the pre-trial investigation. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva, 4, 82-93.

Vinnytsia Town Court (VTC). (2018). Decision in case No 127/20948/18, dated September 5, 2018. Ukraine. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/76327699

Vitkauskas, D. (2018). Protection of the writes for the fair court due to the European Convention on Human Rights. Rada Yevropy, 2, 75-76.

Vovk, M. (2018). Problems of appointment of forensic examinations during the pre-trial investigation of the criminal proceedings and the paths of improvement of their prescription. Visnyk prokuratury, 9, 67-73.

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VRU). (1993). Law of Ukraine: About main principles of conducting of the financial control in Ukraine, dated January 26, 1993, No 2939. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2939-12

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VRU). (1994). Law of Ukraine: About forensic examination, dated February 25, 1994, No. 4038-XII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4038-12

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VRU). (2001). Law of Ukraine: Criminal Code of Ukraine, dated April 5, 2001, No 2341-III. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VRU). (2012). Law of Ukraine: Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, dated April 13, 2012, No. 4651-VI. URL: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VRU). (2014). Law of Ukraine: About the prosecutor's office, dated October 14, 2014, No 1697-VII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1697-18

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VRU). (2017). Law of Ukraine: About amending Commercial Procedure Code of Ukraine, Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Administrative Procedural Code of Ukraine and other legislation, dated October 10, 2017, No 2147-VIII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2147-19/print