Volatilidad del mercado de valores de Pakistán: Una comparación de modelos tipo Garch con cinco distribuciones

Autores/as

  • Sobia Naseem Liaoning Technical University, China
  • Gao lei fu Liaoning Technical University, China
  • Muhammad Mohsin Liaoning Technical University, China
  • Muhammad Zia-ur-Rehman Deportment of Management Science National Textile University, Pakistan
  • Sajjad Ahmad Baig Deportment of Management Science National Textile University, Pakistan

Palabras clave:

Volatilidad, bolsa, modelo GARCH, inversor, económico.

Resumen

Este estudio realiza análisis empíricos que modelan la volatilidad del mercado de valores pakistaní durante el período del 1 de enero de 2008 al 30 de junio de 2018 a través de diferentes modelos de tipo GARCH; Simétrico (GARCH & GARCH-M) y Asymmetric (EGARCH & TGARCH) con cinco técnicas de distribución diferentes, como la distribución normal (Norm), la distribución t de Student (Std.), La distribución de errores generalizada (GED), la distribución t de Student con la corrección del grado de libertad (Std. con corrección DOF) y Distribución de errores generalizada con parámetros de corrección (GED con parámetros de corrección). Los resultados se muestran en GARCH (1, 1) varianza condicional retrasada y perturbación al cuadrado, lo que afecta a la varianza condicional es significativo en toda la distribución. GARCH-M (1, 1) muestra un resultado positivo significativo al 1% en la norma. y GED, que indica la existencia de prima de riesgo e insignificante en el resto de la distribución en. Tanto EGARCH como TGARCH tienen un efecto de apalancamiento significativo al nivel del 1%. Al determinar la precisión y la adecuación de la densidad de pronóstico y la elección del modelo de volatilidad, los resultados en datos simulados indican que la elección de la distribución condicional aparece como un factor más dominante. El modelo EGARCH con la técnica de distribución de Student se entrega con resultados satisfactorios en comparación con otros modelos que están censurados por las herramientas estadísticas de máxima probabilidad de registro, mínimo AIC y SIC. El estudio anterior de la Bolsa de Valores de Pakistán se limita a los modelos de la familia GARCH con una o dos distribuciones. Este estudio cubre las limitaciones y también aporta la literatura existente en este sentido. Esta investigación se considera importante para los inversores, los responsables políticos y los investigadores.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Sobia Naseem, Liaoning Technical University, China

Collage of Optimization and Decision Making, Liaoning Technical University, China

Gao lei fu, Liaoning Technical University, China

Collage of Optimization and Decision Making, Liaoning Technical University, China

Muhammad Mohsin, Liaoning Technical University, China

Collage of Business Administration, Liaoning Technical University, China

Muhammad Zia-ur-Rehman, Deportment of Management Science National Textile University, Pakistan

Deportment of Management Science National Textile University, Pakistan

Sajjad Ahmad Baig, Deportment of Management Science National Textile University, Pakistan

Deportment of Management Science National Textile University, Pakistan

Citas

Ahmed, A. E. M., & Suliman, S. Z. (2011). Modeling stock market volatility using GARCH models evidence from Sudan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(23).

Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE transactions on automatic control, 19(6), 716-723.

Akhtar, S., & Khan, N. (2016). Modelling volatility on Karachi Stock Exchange, Pakistan. Journal of Asia Business Studies. 1-34.

Alberg, D., Shalit, H., & Yosef, R. (2008). Estimating stock market volatility using asymmetric GARCH models. Applied Financial Economics, 18(15), 1201-1208.

Ali Ahmed, H. J., Hassan, T., & Nasir, A. (2005). The relationship between trading volume, volatility and stock market returns: a test of mixed distribution hypothesis for a pre-and post crisis on Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 2(3), 146-158.

Asemota, O. J., & Ekejiuba, U. C. (2017). An Application of Asymmetric GARCH Models on Volatility of Banks Equity in Nigeria’s Stock Market. CBN Journal of Applied Statistics. 8 (1), 73-99.

Azzalini, A. (1985). A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scandinavian journal of statistics, 171-178.

Banumathy, K., & Azhagaiah, R. (2015). Modelling Stock Market Volatility: Evidence from India. Managing Global Transitions: International Research Journal, 13(1), 28-42.

Black, F. (1976). Studies of stock price volatility of changes. American Statistical Association Journal. 177-181.

Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52(3), 345-370.

Bucevska, V. (2013). An Empirical evaluation of GARCH models in value-at-risk estimation: Evidence from the Macedonian stock exchange. Business systems research journal: international journal of the Society for Advancing Business & Information Technology (BIT), 4(1), 49-64.

Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological methods & research, 33(2), 261-304.

Chan, S., Chu, J., Nadarajah, S., & Osterrieder, J. (2017). A statistical analysis of cryptocurrencies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 10(2), 12..

Cheteni, P. (2016). Stock market volatility using GARCH models: Evidence from South Africa and China stock markets. 4-12.

Ding, Z., Granger, C. W., & Engle, R. F. (1993). A long memory property of stock market returns and a new model. Journal of empirical finance, 1(1), 83-106.

Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50 (4), 987-1007.

Engle, R. F., & Bollerslev, T. (1986). Modelling the persistence of conditional variances. Econometric reviews, 5(1), 1-50.

Engle, R. F., & Ng, V. K. (1993). Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility. The journal of finance, 48(5), 1749-1778.

Engle, R. F., Lilien, D. M., & Robins, R. P. (1987). Estimating time varying risk premia in the term structure: The ARCH-M model. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 391-407.

Fang, J., Nakamura, H., & Maeda, H. (2011). The EPR effect: unique features of tumor blood vessels for drug delivery, factors involved, and limitations and augmentation of the effect. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 63(3), 136-151.

Fernández, C., & Steel, M. F. (1998). On Bayesian modeling of fat tails and skewness. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93(441), 359-371.

Floros, C. (2008). Modelling volatility using GARCH models: evidence from Egypt and Israel. Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, (2), 31-41.

Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R., & Runkle, D. E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. The journal of finance, 48(5), 1779-1801.

Gosset, W. S. (1908). Probable error of a correlation coefficient. Biometrika, 6(2-3), 302-310.

Goudarzi, H., & Ramanarayanan, C. S. (2010). Modeling and estimation of volatility in the Indian stock market. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 85.

Hameed, A., Ashraf, H., & Siddiqui, R. (2006). Stock Market Volatility and Weak-form Efficiency: Evidence from an Emerging Market [with Comments]. The Pakistan Development Review, 1029-1040.

Hannan, E. J., & Quinn, B. G. (1979). The determination of the order of an autoregression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 190-195.

Hassan, H. E., Mercer, S. L., Cunningham, C. W., Coop, A., & Eddington, N. D. (2009). Evaluation of the P-glycoprotein (Abcb1) affinity status of a series of morphine analogs: comparative study with meperidine analogs to identify opioids with minimal P-glycoprotein interactions. International journal of pharmaceutics, 375(1-2), 48-54.

Higgins, M. L., & Bera, A. K. (1992). A class of nonlinear ARCH models. International Economic Review, 137-158.

Hung , N. T. (2018). An empirical analysis of Euro Hungarian Forint exchange rate volatility using GARCH. Challenges in National and International Economic Policies. 57–67.

Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1987). A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, 163-172.

Jyothi , U., & Suresh, K. (2014). Estimating Stock Market Volatility Using Non-linear Models . IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM). 62-65.

Kanasro, H. A., Rohra, C. L., & Junejo, M. A. (2009). Measurement of stock market volatility through ARCH and GARCH models: a case study of Karachi stock exchange. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(4), 3123-3127.

Karmakar, M. (2005). Modeling conditional volatility of the Indian stock markets. Vikalpa, 30(3), 21-38.

Khan, N. (2011). Dividend policy and the stock market reaction to dividend announcements in Pakistan (Doctoral dissertation, University of Dundee).

Kumar , H. P., & Patil , B. S. (August 2016 ). Volatility Forecasting- A Performance Measure of GARCH Techniques with Different Distribution Models. International Journal of Soft Computing, Mathematics and Control (IJSCMC), 5(No), 1-13.

Lim, C. M., & Sek, S. K. (2013). Comparing the performances of GARCH-type models in capturing the stock market volatility in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 5, 478-487.

Ling, S., & McAleer, M. (2003). Asymptotic theory for a vector ARMA-GARCH model. Econometric theory, 19(2), 280-310.

Mwita, P. N., & Nassiuma, D. K. (2015). Volatility estimation of stock prices using Garch method. Kabarak Journal of Research & Innovation, 3(1), 48-53.

Najjar, M., Saleh, D., Zelic, M., Nogusa, S., Shah, S., Tai, A., ... & Whalen, M. J. (2016). RIPK1 and RIPK3 kinases promote cell-death-independent inflammation by Toll-like receptor 4. Immunity, 45(1), 46-59.

Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 347-370.

Olbrys, J. (2013). Price and volatility spillovers in the case of stock markets located in different time zones. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 49(sup2), 145-157.

Omorogbe, J. A., Mc Nally, M., Cretu, I., & O'Connor, A. (2017). Mo1181 Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Outcomes: Results From a 17 Year Tertiary Centre Upper GI Surveillance Programme in Ireland. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 85(5), AB452-AB453.

Peters, J. P. (2001). Estimating and forecasting volatility of stock indices using asymmetric GARCH models and (Skewed) Student-t densities. Preprint, University of Liege, Belgium, 3, 19-34.

Poon, S. H., & Granger, C. W. (2003). Forecasting volatility in financial markets: A review. Journal of economic literature, 41(2), 478-539.

Saeed, A. F., Wang, R., Ling, S., & Wang, S. (2017). Antibody engineering for pursuing a healthier future. Frontiers in microbiology, 8, 495.

Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The annals of statistics, 6(2), 461-464.

Shah, A., Shahf, A. H., Parveen, N., Rehman, Z. U., Khan, S. Z., Rana, U. A., ... & Qureshi, R. (2016). Synthesis and electrochemical investigations of piperazines. Electrochimica Acta, 220, 705-711.

Stoyanov, J. V., Gantenbein-Ritter, B., Bertolo, A., Aebli, N., Baur, M., Alini, M., & Grad, S. (2011). Role of hypoxia and growth and differentiation factor-5 on differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells towards intervertebral nucleus pulposus-like cells. Eur Cell Mater, 21(533), e47.

Taylor, S. J. (2008). Modelling financial time series. world scientific.

Theodossiou, P. (1998). Financial data and the skewed generalized t distribution. Management Science, 44(12-part-1), 1650-1661.

Vijayalakshmi, S., & Gaur, S. (2013). Modelling volatility: Indian stock and foreign exchange markets. Journal of Emerging Issues in Economics, Finance and Banking, 2(1), 583-98.

Wennström, A. (2014). Volatility Forecasting Performance: Evaluation of GARCH type volatility models on Nordic equity indices.

Wilhelmsson, A. (2006). Garch Forecasting Performance under Different Distribution Assumptions. Journal of Forecasting, 25, 561–578.

Zakoian, J. M. (1994). Threshold heteroskedastic models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and control, 18(5), 931-955.

Descargas

Publicado

2018-12-27

Cómo citar

Naseem, S., fu, G. lei, Mohsin, M., Zia-ur-Rehman, M., & Baig, S. A. (2018). Volatilidad del mercado de valores de Pakistán: Una comparación de modelos tipo Garch con cinco distribuciones. Amazonia Investiga, 7(17), 486–504. Recuperado a partir de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/763

Número

Sección

Articles