Formas constitucionales típicas de interacción entre las cámaras del parlamento extranjero
Palabras clave:
constitución, interacción entre las cámaras del parlamento, formas típicas de interacción entre las cámaras del parlamentoResumen
El artículo presenta el análisis del autor de los actos constitucionales de los estados europeos con un parlamento bicameral con el fin de fijar algunas formas típicas de interacción entre las cámaras del parlamento en ellos. El estudio ha demostrado que las sesiones conjuntas (sobre el juramento del jefe de estado, las elecciones presidenciales, la decisión de declarar la guerra, la concesión del indulto); formación de comités y comisiones permanentes y temporales; la formación de los cuerpos superiores del poder estatal o el nombramiento de funcionarios sirven como formas típicas de interacción entre las cámaras del parlamento. En el ámbito legislativo, se divulgan formas típicas de interacción entre las cámaras del parlamento como la aprobación de la ley en ambas cámaras en una versión idéntica y el "consentimiento tácito". Se concluye que las formas típicas de interacción entre las cámaras parlamentarias de los estados europeos reflejan sus enfoques soberanos pero establecidos, elaborados por la doctrina y probados por la práctica.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
Abramova A. I. 2008. Interaction of the Chambers of the Russian Parliament in the Modern Legislative Process. Journal of Russian Law. # 7. pp. 31-39. (in Russian).
Antón Chávez, A.D.P (2017). Influencia de la noticia en la imagen corporativa de una municipalidad desde la percepción del ciudadano. Opción, Año 33, No. 84 (2017): 90- 119.
Bahador M., Keshtkar, M. M., (2017). Reviewing and modeling the optimal output velocity of slot linear diffusers to reduce air contamination in the surgical site of operating rooms, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 17 (8), 82-89.
Ballington J. 2005. An Approach to Democracy: Why Include Women? International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Sweden. 265 p.
Bressanelli E., Chelotti N. 2018. The European Parliament and economic governance: explaining a case of limited influence. The Journal of Legislative Studies. Stable URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2018. 1444627.
Brunner, J.J & Ganga-Contreras, F. (2017). Vulnerabilidad educacional en América Latina: Una aproximación desde la sociología de la educación con foco en la educación temprana Opción, Año 33, No. 84 (2017): 12-37.
Chirkin V. Y. 2011. Upper Chamber of Modern Parliament: a comparative legal study. Moscow. 114 p. (in Russian).
Druckman J. N., Thies M. F. 2002. The Importance of Concurrence: The Impact of Bicameralism on Government Formation and Duration. American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 46. #4. pp. 760-771. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3088432.
Halligan J., Miller R., Marcus P. J. 2007. Parliament in the Twenty-first Century: Institutional Reform and Emerging Roles. Melbourne University Press. Melbourne University Publishing. 328 p.
Ilie C. 2010. Strategic uses of parliamentary forms of address: The case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 42. Issue 4. Pages. pp. 885-911.
Ivanova K.A. 2015. Promulgation of laws by the head of state: Russian and foreign experience // Actual problems of Russian law. # 6. pp. 68- 71. (in Russian).
Keshtkar M. M. (2013) Numerical Simulation of Radiative Heat Transfer in a Boiler Furnace Contained with a Non-Gray Gas, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 1(3), 137- 148.
Keshtkar M. M., Ghazanfari M. (2017). Numerical Investigation of Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer Inside a 2D Enclosure with Three Hot Obstacles on the Ramp under the Influence of a Magnetic Field, Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 7 (3), 1647-1657.
Keshtkar, M. (2013) Research Article Simulation of Thermo-Hydraulic Behavior of a Lid-Driven Cavity Considering Gas Radiation Effect and a Heat Generation Zone, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 1(1), 8-23.
Lazareva M.N., 2008. Parliamentary procedures in the Czech Republic and Russia: a comparative analysis. Journal of Russian Law. # 11. pp. 105-111. (in Russian).
Nikonova L.I., Minasyan A.A. 2016. Constitutional spheres and forms of interaction of the chambers of parliaments: foreign experience. Science and education: economy and economics; entrepreneurship; law and management. # 11 (78). pp. 82-87. (in Russian).
Norris P., Inglehart R. 2001. Cultural Obstacles to Equal Representation. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 12. # 3. pp. 126-140.
Russell M., Sciara M. 2006. Parliament: the house of lords – a more representative and assertive chamber? Palgrave Review of British Politics. pp. 122-136. Stable URL: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.105 7/9780230592605_9.
Shvedova N. 2005. Obstacles to Women’s Participation in Parliament. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 265 p.
Thomas P. G. 2009. Parliament Scrutiny of Government Performance in Australia. Australian Journal of Public Administration. Stable URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8500.2009.00646.x
Vig N. J., Paschen H. 2000. Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe. State University of New York. 399 ?.
Waikeung T. 2017. Do female legislators have different policy priorities than their male colleagues in an undemocratic/semi-democratic legislature? The case of Hong Kong. The Journal of Legislative Studies. Vol. 1. Issue 4. pp. 44- 70.
Antón Chávez, A.D.P (2017). Influencia de la noticia en la imagen corporativa de una municipalidad desde la percepción del ciudadano. Opción, Año 33, No. 84 (2017): 90- 119.
Bahador M., Keshtkar, M. M., (2017). Reviewing and modeling the optimal output velocity of slot linear diffusers to reduce air contamination in the surgical site of operating rooms, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 17 (8), 82-89.
Ballington J. 2005. An Approach to Democracy: Why Include Women? International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Sweden. 265 p.
Bressanelli E., Chelotti N. 2018. The European Parliament and economic governance: explaining a case of limited influence. The Journal of Legislative Studies. Stable URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2018. 1444627.
Brunner, J.J & Ganga-Contreras, F. (2017). Vulnerabilidad educacional en América Latina: Una aproximación desde la sociología de la educación con foco en la educación temprana Opción, Año 33, No. 84 (2017): 12-37.
Chirkin V. Y. 2011. Upper Chamber of Modern Parliament: a comparative legal study. Moscow. 114 p. (in Russian).
Druckman J. N., Thies M. F. 2002. The Importance of Concurrence: The Impact of Bicameralism on Government Formation and Duration. American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 46. #4. pp. 760-771. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3088432.
Halligan J., Miller R., Marcus P. J. 2007. Parliament in the Twenty-first Century: Institutional Reform and Emerging Roles. Melbourne University Press. Melbourne University Publishing. 328 p.
Ilie C. 2010. Strategic uses of parliamentary forms of address: The case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 42. Issue 4. Pages. pp. 885-911.
Ivanova K.A. 2015. Promulgation of laws by the head of state: Russian and foreign experience // Actual problems of Russian law. # 6. pp. 68- 71. (in Russian).
Keshtkar M. M. (2013) Numerical Simulation of Radiative Heat Transfer in a Boiler Furnace Contained with a Non-Gray Gas, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 1(3), 137- 148.
Keshtkar M. M., Ghazanfari M. (2017). Numerical Investigation of Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer Inside a 2D Enclosure with Three Hot Obstacles on the Ramp under the Influence of a Magnetic Field, Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 7 (3), 1647-1657.
Keshtkar, M. (2013) Research Article Simulation of Thermo-Hydraulic Behavior of a Lid-Driven Cavity Considering Gas Radiation Effect and a Heat Generation Zone, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 1(1), 8-23.
Lazareva M.N., 2008. Parliamentary procedures in the Czech Republic and Russia: a comparative analysis. Journal of Russian Law. # 11. pp. 105-111. (in Russian).
Nikonova L.I., Minasyan A.A. 2016. Constitutional spheres and forms of interaction of the chambers of parliaments: foreign experience. Science and education: economy and economics; entrepreneurship; law and management. # 11 (78). pp. 82-87. (in Russian).
Norris P., Inglehart R. 2001. Cultural Obstacles to Equal Representation. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 12. # 3. pp. 126-140.
Russell M., Sciara M. 2006. Parliament: the house of lords – a more representative and assertive chamber? Palgrave Review of British Politics. pp. 122-136. Stable URL: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.105 7/9780230592605_9.
Shvedova N. 2005. Obstacles to Women’s Participation in Parliament. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 265 p.
Thomas P. G. 2009. Parliament Scrutiny of Government Performance in Australia. Australian Journal of Public Administration. Stable URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8500.2009.00646.x
Vig N. J., Paschen H. 2000. Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe. State University of New York. 399 ?.
Waikeung T. 2017. Do female legislators have different policy priorities than their male colleagues in an undemocratic/semi-democratic legislature? The case of Hong Kong. The Journal of Legislative Studies. Vol. 1. Issue 4. pp. 44- 70.
Descargas
Publicado
2018-02-27
Cómo citar
Dzybova, S. G., Markhgeym, M. V., Minasyan, A. A., Plohih, A. N., & Stus, N. V. (2018). Formas constitucionales típicas de interacción entre las cámaras del parlamento extranjero. Amazonia Investiga, 7(12), 181–186. Recuperado a partir de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/587
Número
Sección
Articles
.gif)
