Vol. 7 Núm. 12 (2018)
Articles

Inadmisibilidad de experimentos con personas: imperativos constitucionales de los países postsoviéticos

Goar G. Zagaynova
Northern Caucasian branch of the «Russian state University of justice», Russia
Biografía del autor/a

Northern Caucasian branch of the «Russian state University of justice», Russia

Viktor V. Luk'yanchenko
Moscow city court, Moscow, Russia
Biografía del autor/a

Moscow city court, Moscow, Russia

Alevtina E. Novikova
Belgorod State University, Belgorod, Russia
Biografía del autor/a

Belgorod State University, Belgorod, Russia

Evgeniy E. Tonkov
Belgorod State University, Belgorod, Russia
Biografía del autor/a

Belgorod State University, Belgorod, Russia

Ol'ga N. Doronina
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia
Biografía del autor/a

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia

Publicado 2018-02-27

Palabras clave

  • constitución, inadmisibilidad de experimentos obligatorios sobre personas, dignidad de un individuo, prohibición de tortura

Cómo citar

Zagaynova, G. G., Luk'yanchenko, V. V., Novikova, A. E., Tonkov, E. E., & Doronina, O. N. (2018). Inadmisibilidad de experimentos con personas: imperativos constitucionales de los países postsoviéticos. Amazonia Investiga, 7(12), 177–180. Recuperado a partir de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/586

Resumen

El artículo reveló contextos típicos y peculiares, basados en el análisis de los textos constitucionales de los países de la CEI sobre el reflejo de los experimentos obligatorios y su prohibición con personas. Se estudiaron los enfoques de los estados sobre los tipos prohibidos de experimentos con personas y, tomando esto en cuenta, se llegó a la conclusión sobre la conveniencia de formulaciones prohibitivas por la analogía con aquellas que se implementan en disposiciones constitucionales sobre la inadmisibilidad de la discriminación por cualquier motivo. Se observó que con todas las diferencias en los enfoques de este grupo de estados, todos están determinados por el imperativo constitucional de los experimentos sobre la inadmisibilidad de las personas.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Aleksandrovna Maximova, O & V. Aleksandrovich Belyaev (2017). Generational Indigenation in a Multi-Ethnic and -Religious Society (Tatarstan, Russia). Opción, Año 33, No. 84 (2017): 38-64.

Antón Chávez, A.D.P (2017). Influencia de la noticia en la imagen corporativa de una municipalidad desde la percepción del ciudadano. Opción, Año 33, No. 84 (2017): 90- 119.

Bahador M., Keshtkar, M. M., (2017). Reviewing and modeling the optimal output velocity of slot linear diffusers to reduce air contamination in the surgical site of operating rooms, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 17 (8), 82-89.

Bermann G.A. (2004) The European Union as a Constitutional Experiment. – European Law Journal. Wiley Online Library.

Beutel F.K. (1957) Some Potentialities of Experimental Jurisprudence: As a NewBranch of Social Science. University of Nebraska Press.

Beutel F.K. (1971) The Relationship of Experimental Jurisprudence to Other Schools of Jurisprudence and to Scientific Method, 1971 Wash. U. L. Q.

Bose F. (2010) Parliament vs. Supreme court: a veto player framework of the Indian constitutional experiment in the area of economic and civil rights. – Constitutional Political Economy. Springer.

Cairns A.C. (1984) The Canadian Constitutional Experiment. – Dalhousie LJ. HeinOnline. Enwezor O. (2002) Experiments with Truth: Transitional Justice and the Processes of Truth and Reconciliation. Cantz.

Hayden R.M. (2005) “Democracy” without a Demos? The Bosnian Constitutional Experiment and the Intentional Construction of Nonfunctioning States. East European politics and societies. journals.sagepub.com

Hosking G.A. (1973) The Russian Constitutional Experiment: Government and Duma, 1907-1914. books.google.com

John Witte (1996) The Essential Rights and Liberties of Religion in the American Constitutional Experiment. Notre Dame Law Review.

Keshtkar M. M. (2013) Numerical Simulation of Radiative Heat Transfer in a Boiler Furnace Contained with a Non-Gray Gas, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 1(3), 137- 148.

Keshtkar M. M., Ghazanfari M. (2017). Numerical Investigation of Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer Inside a 2D Enclosure with Three Hot Obstacles on the Ramp under the Influence of a Magnetic Field, Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 7 (3), 1647-1657.

Keshtkar, M. (2013) Research Article Simulation of Thermo-Hydraulic Behavior of a Lid-Driven Cavity Considering Gas Radiation Effect and a Heat Generation Zone, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 1(1), 8-23

Khawam J. (2005) A World of Lessons: The Iraqi Constitutional Experiment in Comparative Perspective. – Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. HeinOnline

Landemore H. (2015) Inclusive Constitution? Making: The Icelandic Experiment. – Journal of Political Philosophy. Wiley Online Library

Pollak L.H. (1975) The Constitution as an Experiment. – University of Pennsylvania Law Review. – JSTOR

Qianfan Z. (2007) Constitutional Variability and Local Experiments. – Chinese Journal of Law. en.cnki.com.cn

The CIS Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (Minsk, May 26, 1995) // http://constitution.garant.ru/act/right/megdunar/ 1119744/