Factores políticos y socioeconómicos de debilitar la idea del estado de derecho en una sociedad de riesgo

Autores/as

  • Elena Vladimirovna Parkhomenko Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia.
  • Elena Fedorovna Kuzemina Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia
  • Nataliya Viktorovna Pashkova Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia.
  • Tatiana Rashitovna Khannanova Institute of History and Public Administration. Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.
  • Evgeniya Nikolayevna Bashirina Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Palabras clave:

Conciencia jurídica, idea jurídica, Estado de derecho, sociedad del riesgo.

Resumen

El propósito del artículo es analizar por qué la idea del estado de derecho no coincide con la práctica social y legal y qué tipo de deformaciones de la conciencia jurídica individual y pública engendra. Métodos: los autores utilizaron enfoques sistémicos y dialécticos al identificar los indicadores de deformación de la conciencia jurídica asociados con los extremos de la ausencia o exaltación de la idea del estado de derecho. Resultados: Los autores identificaron factores culturales, políticos, socioeconómicos que debilitan la idea del estado de derecho en una sociedad de riesgo. La peculiaridad de la formación de la conciencia jurídica en una sociedad de riesgo es que experimenta la influencia de dos grupos de factores. El primero es la inestabilidad social causada por las consecuencias de la globalización, la tecnificación, la comercialización, el retraso de la regulación legal del riesgo por la propagación de avalanchas y la escalada de riesgos; La naturaleza formal y relativa de las diferencias en el comportamiento legal e ilegal. Conclusión: los factores identificados limitan la posibilidad de la conciencia jurídica en la comprensión creativa del orden legal, que es un factor de riesgo adicional.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Elena Vladimirovna Parkhomenko, Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia.

Senior Lecturer at the Department of History, Philosophy and Psychology, Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia.

Elena Fedorovna Kuzemina, Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia

Associate Professor at the Department of History, Philosophy and Psychology, Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia

Nataliya Viktorovna Pashkova, Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia.

Associate Professor at the Department of History, Philosophy and Psychology, Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia.

Tatiana Rashitovna Khannanova, Institute of History and Public Administration. Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Professor at the Department of Public Administration, Institute of History and Public Administration. Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Evgeniya Nikolayevna Bashirina, Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Associate Professor at the Department of Economic and Legal Security Provision, Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology. Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Citas

Beck, U. (2009). Critical theory of world risk society: A cosmopolitan vision. Constellations, 16(1), 1–20.

Ellersgaard, C., Larsen, A., & Munk, M. (2012). A very economic elite: the case of the Danish top CEOs. Sociology, 47(6), 1051–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512454349

Brar, D. (2018). Keep the Patels: How culturally competent teamwork can alleviate the law’s diversity retention problem. Asian American Law Journal, 25(1), 123–143.

Brownsword, R. (2019). Law, Technology and Society: Reimagining the Regulatory Environment. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351128186

Foucault, ?. (1988). Technologies of the Self. University of Massachusets Press.

Glotina, I.M. (2014). Kiberprestupnost': osnovnyye proyavleniya i ekonomicheskiye posledstviya [Cybercrime: main manifestations and economic consequences]. Voprosy Ekonomiki i Prava, 8, 11-15. https://law-journal.ru/files/pdf/201408/201408_11.pdf

Jacobs, D. (2015). Extreme wealth is not merited. Oxfam discussion papers, November. https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/dp-extreme-wealth-is-not-merited-241115-en.pdf.

Kortunov, S.V. (2009). Covremennaya vneshnyaya politika Rossii. Strategiya izbiratel'noy vovlechennosti [Modern Russian foreign policy. Selective Engagement Strategy]. ?oscow: Higher School of Economics.

Krasilnikova, Yu. I. (2016, December 23). II pozvolit nezametno poddelyvat' foto i video [AI will provide quiet fake photos and videos]. Official website of Autonomous Noncommercial Organization “Innopolis Media”. https://hightech.fm/2016/12/23/image_manipulation.

Lukmanova, R.Kh., & Sirazetdinova, M.F. (2016). Osnovnyye printsipy protivodeistviya manipulyatsii soznaniyem [The fundamental principles of resistance to consciousness manipulation]. Bulletin of the Volgograd University. Series: Social Technologies, 1(31), 43–49.
https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26289563.

Pozdyaeva, S.M. (2011). Criminal forms of sociality as a brake on Russian modernization. In Russia in the global world. Proceedings of the 9th All-Russian Scientific-Theoretical Conference (pp. 245–248). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24455849

Rakhmatullin, R.Yu. (2014). Erich Neumann on the role of the “scapegoat” in the formation of the conflict. Young Scientist, 13, 235–237. https://moluch.ru/archive/72/12320/

Shakirova, E. Yu. (2013). Aksiologicheskaya rizomorfnost' sotsiuma: zona eskalatsii sotsial'noy riskogennosti [Axiological rhizomorphism of society: an escalation zone of social risk escalation] Izvestiya SGU. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, 13(4), 36–41. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21084716.

Sirazetdinova, M.F. (2014). Sotsial'no-gumanitarnoye znaniye i iskusstvennyy intellekt [Social and humanitarian knowledge and artificial intelligence]. In: ITIDS+RRS'2014 Second Conference Proceedings (pp. 207–209, vol. 2), Ufa, Russia: Ufa State Aviation Technical University. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21739446.

Sprague, J. (2015). Empire, global capitalism, and theory: Reconsidering Hardt and Negri. The Diversity of Social Theories, 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0278-1204(2011)0000029014.

Tampubolon, G. & Savage, ?. (2012). Intergenerational and intragenerational social mobility in Britain. In Lambert, P.S., Connelly, R., Blackburn, M., Gayle, V. S. (eds.), Social Stratification: Trends and Processes (pp. 115–131). Ashgate: Aldershot.

Tumbinskaya, M.V. (2017). The process of disseminating unwanted information in social networks. Business Informatics, 3(41), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.17323/1998-0663.2017.3.65.76

Descargas

Publicado

2019-09-26

Cómo citar

Parkhomenko, E. V., Kuzemina, E. F., Pashkova, N. V., Khannanova, T. R., & Bashirina, E. N. (2019). Factores políticos y socioeconómicos de debilitar la idea del estado de derecho en una sociedad de riesgo. Amazonia Investiga, 8(22), 324–330. Recuperado a partir de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/479

Número

Vol. 8 Núm. 22 (2019)

Sección

Articles