National cultural characteristics of the Khanty’s communicative behavior in stimulating speech acts
Keywords:
Speech act, communicative behavior, motivation, Khanty peoples, national and cultural characteristics.Abstract
The scientific article for the first time presents a study of the ways of expressing motives on the material of the Khanty language. These methods are comprehensively analyzed in specific communicative situations used by the speaker and addressed to the listener. The imperative paradigm in speech constructs includes word forms of the verbal lexeme, expressing an imperative meaning addressed to the listener. As a result of linguistic analysis of such speech acts, it is revealed that the speaker’s will regarding the execution of the called action is expressed regardless of who performs the action: the listener, the speaker, the person not participating in the speech act, or any combination of the listed persons. The main (nuclear) way of expressing an impulse is an imperative construct.
Downloads
References
?lpatov, V.?. (1973). The category of politeness in modern Japanese. M.: Science, 1973. 163 ?.
Berdyaev, ?.?. (1990). Selfknowledge. ?.. 196 ?.
Dubichinsky, V.V. (1993). Lexical Parallels. Kharkov, 253 ?.
Formanovskaya, N.I. (1998). Communicative and pragmatic aspects of communication units. Moscow: Russian language Institute. name A. S. Pushkin, 250 ?.
Gumboldt, V. (1994). On the difference in the structure of human languages and its impact on the spiritual development of mankind // Selected works on linguistics. ?.. 294 ?.
Jacobson, R. (1975). Linguistics and poetics // Structuralism “for” and “against”. ?.: Progress, P. 193-230.
Kholodovich, ?.?. (1967). On the typology of speech // historical and philological studies. ?.. 187 ?.
Khrakovsk,y V.S., Volodin, A. P. (1986). Semantics and typology of the imperative. Russian imperative. L.: Science, 1986. 290 ?.
Larina, ?.V. (2009). Category of politeness and communication style: Comparison of English and Russian linguistic and cultural traditions. ?.: Handwritten monuments of Ancient Russia, 2009. P. 223.
Melchuk, I.?. (1998). Course of General morphology. ?. II. P. 2.: Morphological values. M.: Lang.Rusyi. culture, Vienna: WienerSlavistischerAlmanach, 1998. 355 ?.
Onina, S.V. (2001). On some functions of the Luv pronoun ‘on, she’ in the Khanty language // Proceedings of the III Ugric readings / Ed. In. Lukin. Tomsk, 2001. 248 ?.
Plungyan, V.?. (2011). Introduction to grammatical semantics: grammatical meanings and grammatical systems of world languages: studies benefit. M.: RSUH, 2011. 672 ?.
Solovar, V.N. (2006). Khanty-Russian dictionary. SPb: ??? «?irall».