Condition and Prospects of Innovation-Driven, Scientific and Technological Development of the Regional Industry in Russia

Mikhail Yakovlevich Veselovsky; Marina Alexeevna Izmailova; Igor Viktorovich Balynin; Natalia Sergeevna Sergienko

Mikhail Yakovlevich Veselovsky University of technology, Moscow region, Russia
Marina Alexeevna Izmailova Federal State-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Education Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russia.
Igor Viktorovich Balynin Federal State-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Education Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russia.
Natalia Sergeevna Sergienko Federal State-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Education Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russia.

Keywords: innovations, innovation-driven growth, scientific and technological development, innovative archetypes of sectors, development scenarios, regions, industry.

Abstract

Results of the analysis of innovation-driven, scientific and technological development of Russian regions are provided in the article, which allow to identify regional leaders in this area, estimate their potential for the country's economic growth, and understand possibilities of the regions lagging behind in innovation-driven, scientific and technological development for their establishment as new landmarks of scientific and technological progress. Content of the scientific approach to assessing the level of innovation-driven growth of the Russian economy sectors is described in detail based on characteristics of the four innovative archetypes of sectors: performance, engineering, scientific, and consumer. The unevenness of the sectoral development is shown both within one innovation archetype and in the whole sector, based on the calculation of the relative market share index for the Russian economy sectors. Description of the specifics and success factors of the innovation process for each of the innovative archetypes of sectors is provided. It is emphasized that the criticality ranking for success factors associated with the demand for innovation and the innovation proposals is defined by the archetype of innovations, each requiring a special approach from the state and private business. Results of a comparative analysis of possible scenarios for the innovation-driven growth of the national economy and their forecast results are provided, with due consideration for the leading trends in economic development in the national and global markets. The necessity of the scientific and technological modernization of the Russian economy towards the model of innovation-driven growth is substantiated. Conclusions are made about the inevitability of Russia’s transition to a new technological paradigm, which requires the formation of a new scientific, innovation-driven and industrial policy focused on innovation and technological renewal of the entire economic landscape, making the economy truly innovative.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mikhail Yakovlevich Veselovsky, University of technology, Moscow region, Russia

University of technology, Moscow region, Russia

Marina Alexeevna Izmailova, Federal State-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Education Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russia.

Federal State-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Education Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russia.

Igor Viktorovich Balynin, Federal State-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Education Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russia.

Federal State-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Education Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russia.

Natalia Sergeevna Sergienko, Federal State-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Education Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russia.

Federal State-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Education Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russia.

References

Forecast of socioeconomic development through to 2020. Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation, August 30, 2017. Retrieved April 28, 2019 from http://economy.gov.ru/wps/ wcm/connect/54b630f2-8bff-4b50-8e28-342199e57eea/170830.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=54b630f2-8bff-4b50-8e28- 342199e57eea.

Freeman C., Soete L. (1997). The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3d. ed. London, Pinter, 345.

Glazyev S. (2017). Ekonomikabudushchego. Yest li u Rossiishans? [Economy of the future. Does Russia have a chance?]. Moscow, Knizhnyi Mir, 640.

GlazyevS.Yu. (2015). Oneotlozhnykhmerakhpoukrepleniyuekonomicheskoybezopasnosti
Rossiiivyvodurossiyskoyekonomikinatrayektoriyuoperezhayushchegorazvitiya [About urgent measures to strengthen the economic security of Russia and withdrawal of the Russian economy to the priority development path]. Report. Moscow, Institute of Economic Strategies, Russian Biographical Institute, 60.

Hermann M., Pentek T., Otto B. (2016). Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios. The 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3928-3937.

Hettne B. (1999). Globalization and the New Regionalism: The Second Great Transformation.