Features of socio-economic systems’ transformation processes management

  • Viktor Evgenyevich Reutov Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Russia
  • Diana Dmitrievna Burkaltseva Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Russia
  • Valentina Maryanovna Yachmeneva Vernadsky Crimean Federal University,  Russia
  • Margarita Valentinovna Algina Don State Technical University, Russia
  • Elena Aleksandrovna Smirnova Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Russia
  • Andrey Sergeevich Tyulin Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Russia
Keywords: Management, socio-economic system, transformation, system sustainability, digital society.

Abstract

In the 21st century, the main trend in the development of society is widespread digitalization. It arose due to the emergence of the Internet and the rapid development of electronic computers. The influence of digitalization determines the scientific relevance of the research. Purpose. The purpose of the study is to reveal features of socio-economic systems’ transformation processes management at each stage of evolution. To achieve this goal the following tasks have been solved: - A qualitative scheme for changing the structure of the world economy under the influence of industrial revolutions has been presented; - The approach to socio-economic systems’ transformation processes management from the society typologization standpoint has been systematized; - The essence of the crypto economy as a particular case of digital society has been revealed. Results.
1. An aggregated typology of socio-economic systems’ transformation development in the conditions of digital society has been constructed. 2. An improved scheme of changes in the structure of the world economy under the supervision of industrial revolutions has been constructed.
3. The main theories of socio-economic systems’ transformation management have been considered.
4. The characteristic features of socio-economic systems’ management have been revealed.
5. A detailed classification of socio-economic systems’ transformation processes management from the position of society typologization has been proposed.
6. The essence of digital society has been disclosed and its categories have been substantiated. Conclusions/Relevance. Today socio-economic systems’ transformation processes management in the conditions of digitalization and widespread change in business processes is a pressing challenge. New business models that take into account digitalization will discredit modern approaches to management and business. The need for cognitive communication between people has always existed, and ubiquitous digitalization reduces the time of communication between people and consumer behavior, which allows highlighting the following types of economies: digital economy, virtual economy, sharing economy, crypto economy.

Author Biographies

Viktor Evgenyevich Reutov, Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Russia

V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Russia

Diana Dmitrievna Burkaltseva, Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Russia

V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Russia

Valentina Maryanovna Yachmeneva, Vernadsky Crimean Federal University,  Russia

V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Russia

Margarita Valentinovna Algina, Don State Technical University, Russia

Don State Technical University, Russia

Elena Aleksandrovna Smirnova, Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Russia

V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Russia

Andrey Sergeevich Tyulin, Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Russia

V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Russia

References

Apatova, N.V., Boychenko O.V., Nekrasova T.P., & Malkov S.V. (2017). Virtual telecommunication enterprises and their risk assessment. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10531 LNCS, 326-336.

Babkin, A.V., Burkaltseva D.D., Betskov A.V., Kilyaskhanov H.Sh., Tyulin A.S., & Kurianova I.V. (2018). Automation Digitalization Blockchain: Trends and Implementation Problems. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(3.14), 254-260.

Dzarasov, S.S. (2004). Theory of capital and economic growth: study guide. Moscow: Publishing House of Lomonosov Moscow State University.

Feofanov, K.A. (2016). Civilization theory of modernization. Moscow: Izdatelskie resheniya.

Filipenko, A.C. (2002). Economic development: a civilizational approach. Moscow: Ekonomika Publishing House.

Hodgson, J. (2001). The socio-economic implications of the progress of knowledge and increasing complexity. Questions of Economics, 8, 32-45.

Kats, I.S., & Simonova, V.L. (2016). The evolution of social innovation in the public sector. Journal of Economic Theory, 1, 137-142.

Keshelava, A.V. (2017). Introduction to the "Digital" economy. Moscow: VNIIgeosystem.

Khubiev, K.A. (2012). Economic theory: between past and future. Terra Economicus, 10(3), 58-62.

Kosten, D. (2016). Bitcoin Mission – Decentralization of Financial and Governing Levers of Regulatory Institutions. Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

Nikolaev, L.A., & Chernaya, I.P. (2006). Problems of periodization of the history of economics. In: History of Economics. Moscow: Ecoperspectiva.

Pinkovetskaia, I.S. (2019). Indicadores económicos de la actividad de las pequeñas y medianas empresas en Rusia. Revista Científica del Amazonas, 2 (4), 5-17.

Popov, E. V., & Sukharev, O. S. (2016). Institutional factors of economic changes in the theory of Douglas North. Journal of Economic Theory, 3, 117-133.

Popov, E.V. (2012). Evolution of economic institutions by J. Schumpeter. Bulletin PNRPU, 14(38), 30-55.

Pshenichnikov, V.V., & Babkin, A.V. (2017). Digital money as a product of the development of information and telecommunication technologies. Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies, 259-265.

Reutov, V.E., Burkaltseva, D.D., Blazhevich, O.G., Borsch, L.M., Gabrielyan, O.A., Khlybova, N.A., & Guk, O.A. (2018). The Method of Assessing the State’s Financial Security Level. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(3.14), 404-411.

Sazonova, G.A. (2002). Structural transformation of economic systems: the dissertation of the doctor of economic sciences. St. Petersburg: Institute of Problems of Regional Economics RAS.

Simchenko, N., Tsohla, S., & Murava-Sereda, A. (2015). Institutional Practices of Economic Experiments in the Field of Money Circulation in Crimea (1783-1917). Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(S10), 1-8.

Sukharev, O.S. (2011). The economy of the future: the theory of institutional change (new evolutionary approach). Moscow: Finance and Statistics.

Varnaliy, Z., Onyshchenko, S., & Zavora, T. (2018). Construction complex development influence on region social and economic security. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(3.2), 469-472.

Vovchenko, N.G., Gontmacher, M.B., Tishchenko, E.N., & Epifanova, T.V. (2017). Electronic currency: the potential risks to national security and methods to minimize them. European Research Studies Journal, 20(1), 36-48.

Webster, F. (2004). Theories of the Information Society. Moscow: The Aspect of Press.

Williamson, O.E. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stocks. Looking Ahead Journal of Economic Literature, 3, 595-613.

Zhuravleva, G.P. (2014). Formation of the new economy and its most important features. In: Economic theory. Macroeconomics, Metaeconomics, Economics Transformation: Textbook. Moscow.
Published
2019-09-27
How to Cite
Reutov, V., Burkaltseva, D., Yachmeneva, V., Algina, M., Smirnova, E., & Tyulin, A. (2019). Features of socio-economic systems’ transformation processes management. Amazonia Investiga, 8(22), 467-474. Retrieved from https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/788
Section
Articles