The symbolic dimension of the product ontology

  • Anton S. Krasnov Kazan Federal University
Keywords: philosophy; goods; thing; capitalism; metaphysics.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to reveal the symbolic nature of the goods, which forms not only its market value. Man, being in a state of joint existence with the world of things created by nature or labor, is forced to comprehend this world in reflective, sensationalistic and metaphysical dimensions. Goods and things are intermediaries between man and the world, man and society, but an important role is played less by their material incarnation than by the connection with the transcendent, ultimately sensible measurement of human life, because the basis for giving things and goods symbolism is the existential human need determined by the human nature. Man, understanding his own finitude in this being, understanding the value of life, strives to realize one of the relative forms of immortality - to preserve a part of his natural uniqueness in material things. Modern technologies allow everyone to make this and formation and development of the Internet and IT-technologies allows each person to listen to others and be heard, to leave their thoughts, products of spiritual production in another dimension - virtual reality. But what happens to the person himself and how does this affect his essence? Is it possible to transfer the products of human labor activity into the space of virtual reality without losing their supersensible nature? And what, in the final analysis, is the transition from capitalism to postcapitalism, marking a new vector of the objectification of the human essence? This article is devoted to answering these questions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Anton S. Krasnov, Kazan Federal University

Kazan Federal University

References

Aristotle (2015). Metaphysics. M.: Eksmo, 2015- 448 p.

Baudrillard J. (2000). Symbolic exchange and death. M.: “Dobrosvet”, 387 p.

Frazer J. G. (1894). The Golden Bough. A Study in Comparative Religion, M.A. Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge In Two Volumes. Vol. I. New York and London MacMillan and Co., 400 p.

Hegel G. (1975). Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences T.1. The Science of Logic M.: Mysl, 1975- 452 p.

Heidegger M. (1986). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen. Max Niemeyer Verlag GmbH, 437 p.

Jünger E. (1982). Der Arbeiter. Herrschaft und Gestalt. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart, 322 p.

Krasnov A. S. (2017b). Abstract labor as the only possible form of socially useful labor in modern capitalism/A.S.
Krasnov, M.L. Tyzov, O.O.Volchkova//Ad alta-journal of interdisciplinary research. Vol.7, Is.2. - P.225- 226.

Krasnov A. S. (2017a). The essence of living in the context of neo-classical understanding/A.S. Krasnov, G.P. Menchikov //Quid-investigacion ciencia y tecnologia. Vol., Is.28. - P.734-738.

Losev A.F. (1993). Thing and name / A.F. Losev. Being. Name. Space. M.: “Mysl”,– 958 p.

Marx K. (1844). Economical and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. /Сomplete edition.// - К. Marx and F. Engels. Works. Ed. 2-е. Т. 42. – 761 p.

Marx K. (1960). Capital: Criticism of Political Economy [Т. 1–3] / Сomplete edition / K. Marx, F. Engels. - 2nd ed. - Moscow: Politizdat, T. 23. - 900 p.

Moss M. (2011). Experience about the gift. Form and basis of exchange in archaic societies / Moss M. Society. Exchange. Personality. Works on social anthropology. - Moscow: KDU, 416 p

Teilhard de Chardin P. (2008). The Phenomenon of Man. Harper Perennial Modern Classics, London, 320 p.
Published
2018-02-27
How to Cite
Krasnov, A. (2018). The symbolic dimension of the product ontology. Amazonia Investiga, 7(12), 273-278. Retrieved from https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/617
Section
Articles
Bookmark and Share