Comparative psychological and philosophical study of relationship between the ego and body

Mohammad Mahdi Masoudi

Mohammad Mahdi Masoudi Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Keywords: psychology, philosophy, ego, body

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to achieve a comprehensive and adaptable theory about the relationship between the ego and the body. Since, achieving a more comprehensive and beautiful theory is the property of comparative studies, we proceed to comparative approach of the philosophy, wisdom and psychology in this field. "What and how is the relationship between the ego and the body" is described from the point of view of the philosophy and psychology. The results indicate that the approach of contemporary psychology, which has onedimensional look to human and put aside concepts such as incorporeal ego and the soul for not being experimentally investigated, using the sciences and the teachings of the philosophy can choose a valid basis for itself and consider all aspects of human existential such as material, immaterial or physical and soulual. Otherwise, philosophers and commentators should use empirical research results in their later works.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mohammad Mahdi Masoudi, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Islamic Theology Department, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

References

Amidi, A. (1994). Explanation of Ghareer al- Hakam and Dar al-Kolem, Tehran University Press, Tehran.

Aristotle. B. (1999). About the ego, suspension, translation and margins: Ali Moradi, Tehran: Hikmat.

Bagheri, K. (2010). Approaches and Research Methods in Philosophy of Education, Tehran: Research Institute for Cultural and Social Studies.

Hatami, M.R. (2003). Psychology and Basic Relationship with Philosophy, Knowledge. 75, 104-101.

Hojjati, S., & Shrqavi, H. (1986). A step beyond Islamic Psychology, Tehran: Islamic Culture Publishing Office.

Hooper., J., Dick, H. (1993). The Brain World, Translation by Ebrahim Yazdi, Tehran: Qalam Publishing.

Ibn Sina, H. (1973). Healing, Natural, Correcting Ibrahim Madkour. Egypt, Al-Haya Al-Masriya Alame Lelkatab.

Kharrazi, K., & Ramadan, N. (1996). A Guide to Cognitive Psychology and Knowledge Science, Nashr-e-Nei, Tehran, First Printing.

Lazi, J. (1998). Historical income to the philosophy of science. Translation: Ali Paya. Tehran, Samt publication.

Misyak, H., Virginia, S. (1997). History and Schools of Psychology, Translation by Ahmad Rezvani, Mashhad: Astan Qadas Razavi Publishing.

Plato, A. (2016). Review of plato's publications, translation by Mohammad Hassan Lotfi.Tehran: Kharazmi.

Sadr al-Din Shirazi, M. (1919). Al-Asfar al-Qalitah al-Arba'ah, Dar al-'Arti al-Arabi. Beirut, fifth edition.

Sadr al-Din Shirazi, M. (2005). Al-Hikmah al-Muta'yyah al-asfar al-'Arba'ah.

Sadr al-Din Shirazi, M. (2001). Al-Mbda and al-Mā'd, Bostan Book Publishing, Qom, Third Edition.

Siasi, A. (2002). Theories of Personality or Schools of Psychology. Mashhad: Islamic Research Foundation of Ghods Razavi Province.

Tabatabaei, M. (1995). T. Elmizan, v. 10, Translation by Seyyed Mohammad Baqir Mousavi Hamedani. Qom: The Society of Teachers at Qom, Qom Publications Office.

Tellings, A. (2001). Eclecticism and Integration in Educational Theories: A Metatheoretical Analysis. Educational Theory. 51(3), 277-292.

Tellings, A. (2011). Theories and Research in the Field of Education: An Indissoluble Union in The Role of Theory in Educational Research Report from the March Seminar.