Vol. 13 No. 81 (2024)
Articles

The impact of video on military engineering learning in wartime

Oleh Chyzh
Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine.
Bio
Yurii Smolinskyi
Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine.
Bio
Artur Vyntu
Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine.
Bio
Vitalii Kiretov
Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine.
Bio
Viktor Chmyr
Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine.
Bio

Published 2024-09-30

Keywords

  • video technologies, personalized video, interactive learning environment, video lecture, video-based games.

How to Cite

Chyzh, O., Smolinskyi, Y., Vyntu, A. ., Kiretov, V., & Chmyr, V. (2024). The impact of video on military engineering learning in wartime. Amazonia Investiga, 13(81), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.81.09.20

Abstract

Video technologies have become a powerful tool in the system of professional training of future officers, and the research is oriented towards the revealing the potential of video may contribute to the improvement of cadets’ learning outcomes during wartime significantly. Besides, the article investigates the integration of video technologies in the military engineering classroom and describes interactive video-based learning environment. A quasi-experiment with intervention and control groups was used to answer the research questions. The findings demonstrated the significance of using video in engineering education and the calculation of difference-in-differences value proved the positive impact of videos on cadets’ learning outcomes. The experiment revealed eighteen teaching strategies for integrating video in the military engineering classroom. Also, we provided a detailed classification of characteristics typical for video content in military engineering education. In addition, an interactive video-based learning environment was defined. Regarding the formation of professional competence among future military engineering officers, an interactive video-based learning environment was described through certain requirements. The research results can be used to improve the curriculum for future military engineering officers. Also, the findings may contribute to the design of professional training programs for military educators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Abdul-Rahaman, A.-M., & Tindam, T. N. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education on students’ achievement in secondary schools. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i2.179
  2. Afkar, M., Karimi, P., Gavagsaz-Ghoachani, R., Phattanasak, M., & Sethakul, P. (2023). Revolutionizing engineering education: Exploring experimental video-on-demand for learning. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 13(7), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v13i7.41683
  3. Barabino, G. A. (2021). Engineering solutions to COVID-19 and racial and ethnic health disparities. Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 8(2), 277–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-020-00953-x
  4. Bhardwaj, A., & Gupta, A. (2023). Role of video lectures in engineering education. International Journal of Educational Reform, 32(2), 208-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879221142548
  5. Bhinder, N. (2022). The reshaping of professional discourse among young military leaders during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ukraine. Arab World English Journal, 2, 85-103. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid2.6
  6. Bhinder, N. V. (2019). Professional training of border guards in Ukraine: Challenges and opportunities related to emerging security threats. Educational Process: International Journal, 8(1), 72-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2019.81.5
  7. Bhinder, N., & Protsenko, P. (2022). Implementation of project-based learning technology within the educational process of higher military institutions. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, 4(49), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2022.262064
  8. Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE life sciences education, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
  9. Buckley, J., Trevelyan, J., & Winberg, C. (2021). Perspectives on engineering education from the world of practice. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.2000694
  10. Bushuyev, S., Korchova, H., Krasylnyk, Y., Rudenko, M., & Kozyr, B. (2024). Development of clip thinking of higher education students in information environment. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 99(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v99i1.5376
  11. Bushuyev, S., Murzabekova, S., Khusainova, M., & Chernysh, O. (2024). Clip thinking in the digital age: complementary or contradictory. Procedia Computer Science, 231, 317-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.12.210
  12. Corral, D., & Yang, M. (2024). An introduction to the difference-in-differences design in education policy research. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25, 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09959-0
  13. Danilyan, O. G, Dzebanb, O. P., Kalynovskyi, Y. Y., Pavlichenko, O. O., & Serhieieva, H. A. (2023). Applying information technologies at higher military education institutions of Ukraine in the current context: Pedagogical and psychological aspects. Academia y Virtualidad, 16(1), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.18359/ravi.6303
  14. Dehne, M., & Gröschner, A. (2023). Utility-value change and the role of emotional cost in video-based learning: a matter of student teachers' interpretation of experience. Frontiers in psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1166921
  15. Deng, R., Feng, S., & Shen, S. (2024). Improving the effectiveness of video-based flipped classrooms with question-embedding. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 12677–12702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12303-5
  16. Desai T. S., & Kulkarni, D. C. (2022). Assessment of interactive video to enhance learning experience: A case study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 35(1), 74-80. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2022/v35is1/22011
  17. Etemi, B. P., Uzunboylu, H., Latifi, S., & Abdigapbarova, U. (2024). The effect of the flipped learning approach on engineering students’ technology acceptance and self-directed learning perception. Sustainability, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020774
  18. Feijoo-Garcia, M. A., Holstrom, M. S., Magana, A. J., & Newell, B. A. (2024). Simulation-based learning and argumentation to promote informed design decision-making processes within a first-year engineering technology course. Sustainability, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072633
  19. Fyfield, M., Henderson, M., Heinrich, E., & Redmond, P. (2019). Videos in higher education: Making the most of a good thing. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5930
  20. Gopalan, M., Rosinger, K., & Ahn, J. B. (2020). Use of quasi-experimental research designs in education research: Growth, promise, and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218-243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302
  21. Gumaelius, L., Skogh, I. B., Matthíasdóttir, Á., & Pantzos, P. (2024). Engineering education in change. A case study on the impact of digital transformation on content and teaching methods in different engineering disciplines. European Journal of Engineering Education, 49(1), 70–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2285794
  22. Ismail, Y., Okwan, P., Khalifa, F., Lawson, A., & Lacy, F. (2024). Improving the practical skills of STEM students at a historically black college and university (HBCU). Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(6), 3507. http://dx.doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i6.3507
  23. Jiang, J., Vauras, M., Volet, S., Salo, A.-E., & Kajamies, A. (2019). Autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching in the classroom: A video-based case study. Education Sciences, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030229
  24. Kamentsev, D., Havryshkiv, O., Kukharska, L., Romashko, O., & Baybakova, I. (2022). Learning english through YouTube as a self-development factor for future officers. Amazonia Investiga, 11(55), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.55.07.14
  25. Kornuta, O., Pryhorovska, T., & Potiomkina, N. (2017). Clip thinking and clip perception: Teaching methods aspect. Open educational e-environment of Modern University, (3), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2017.3.7579
  26. La Torre, S., & Désiron, J. C. (2024). From research to practice: Are multimedia principles present in instructional videos used by teachers in science and history?. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09753-2
  27. Lavrysh, Y., Lytovchenko, I., Lukianenko, V., & Golub, T. (2022). Teaching during the wartime: Experience from Ukraine. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2098714
  28. Lee, L., Estrada, H., & Khazaeli, M. (2018). Effective engineering video tutorials. Journal of Online Engineering Education, 9(2). https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/soecs-facarticles/280
  29. Lu, J. C.-C. (2023). Creating effective educational videos on YouTube in higher education. Engineering Proceedings, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023038032
  30. Lucenko, G., Lutsenko, O., Tiulpa, T., Sosnenko, O., & Nazarenko, O. (2023). Online – Education and training in higher educational institutions of Ukraine: Challenges and benefits. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100231
  31. Lowe, D., Tilley, E., Willey, K., & Roach, K. (2024). Student reactions to the development of professional engineering competencies. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2024.2354240
  32. Madariaga, L., Nussbaum, M., Gutiérrez, I., Barahona, C., & Meneses, A. (2021). Assessment of user experience in video-based learning environments: From design guidelines to final product. Computers & Education, 167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104176
  33. Maistrenko, O. V., Bubenshchykov, R. V., & Stetsiv, S. V. (2020). The use of simulation modelling tools in a practical training for the prospective officers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 75(1), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v75i1.2676
  34. Mamedova, L., Rukovich, A., Likhouzova, T., & Vorona-Slivinskaya, L. (2023). Online education of engineering students: Educational platforms and their influence on the level of academic performance. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 15173–15187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11822-5
  35. Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Video improves learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 204-236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321990713
  36. Nonthamand, N. (2024). Designing the video-based learning environments using workflow and scaffolding to enhance self-instructional video production ability of pre-service teacher. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14102
  37. Núñez-Pacheco, R., Espinoza-Montoya, C., Yucra-Quispe, L., Turpo-Gebera, O., & Aguaded, I. (2023). Serious video games in engineering education: A scoping review. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(2), 446-460. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1743
  38. Onyeaka, H., Passaretti, P., Miri, T., Hart, A., Favero, C., Anumudu, C. K., & Robbins, P. (2023). Pre-lab video demonstrations to enhance students’ laboratory experience in a first-year chemical engineering class. Biochemistry and molecular biology education, 51(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21688
  39. Otoum, N., & Alzoubi, A. M. (2024). Improving algebraic thinking and productive desire among a training program based on (TPACK) model in Jordan. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i2.172
  40. Ożadowicz, A. (2020). Modified blended learning in engineering higher education during the COVID-19 lockdown – Building automation courses case study. Education Sciences, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100292
  41. Polkowski, Z., Jadeja, R., & Dutta, N. (2020). Peer learning in technical education and it’s worthiness: Some facts based on implementation. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 247-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.039
  42. Ralph, B. J., Woschank, M., Pacher, C., & Murphy, M. (2022). Evidence-based redesign of engineering education lectures: theoretical framework and preliminary empirical evidence. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(4), 636–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.2025341
  43. Ribeiro, G. R. P., Bonini, L. M., Franco, F. C., & Prados, R. M. N. (2016) Education, culture and heritage: A proposal for use of YouTube videos in high school. Creative Education, 7(17), 2640-2651. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.717248
  44. Seago, N., & Knotts, A. (2021). Impact of the design of an asynchronous video-based learning environment on teacher noticing and mathematical knowledge. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i4.4218
  45. Singh, A., Ferry, D., Ramakrishnan, A., & Balasubramanian, S. (2020). Using virtual reality in biomedical Engineering Education. Journal of biomechanical engineering, 142(11). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4048005
  46. Sirotová, M., Michvocíková, V., & Rubacha, K. (2021). Quasi-experiment in the educational reality. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 12(1), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2021.1.189.201
  47. Snigdha, S. S., & Akter, M. (2023). Effectiveness of audio-visual materials in teaching reading for young EFL learners in Bangladesh: An experimental study. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v1i4.84
  48. Stefanova, T. A. (2014). Using of training video films in the engineering education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1181-1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.366
  49. Teplická, K., Kádárová, J., & Hurná, S. (2022). The new model of the engineering education using digitalization and innovative methods. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 30(3), 207-213. https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2022-0026
  50. Tretko, V., Vasіutina T., Kolomiiets, I., Iievliev, O., & Kramar, V. (2023). Functions and principles of creating quality information support for the educational space of higher education institution. Amazonia Investiga, 12(69), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.69.09.4
  51. Ueki, Y., & Guaita Martínez, J. M. (2019). The impact of engineers’ skills and problem-solving abilities on process innovation. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 2018–2037. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1596826
  52. Yildririm, S. (2018). The effect of educational videos used in history education on academic success. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 5(3), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2018.53.193.207
  53. Zhu, J., Yuan, H., Zhang, Q., Huang, P. H., Wang, Y., Duan, S., … & Song, P. (2022). The impact of short videos on student performance in an online-flipped college engineering course. Humanities & social sciences communications, 9(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01355-6