Vol. 13 No. 81 (2024)
Articles

Innovative technologies for the development of critical thinking in students

PDF EPUB HTML
  • Olga Chashechnikova,
  • Oksana Odintsova,
  • Iryna Hordiienko,
  • Oksana Danylchuk,
  • Liudmyla Popova
Olga Chashechnikova
Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A. S. Makarenko, Ukraine.
Bio
Oksana Odintsova
Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A.S. Makarenko, Ukraine.
Bio
Iryna Hordiienko
Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Ukraine.
Bio
Oksana Danylchuk
Vasyl' Stus Donetsk National University, Ukraine.
Bio
Liudmyla Popova
National Technical University of Ukraine "Ihor Sikorskyi Kyiv Polytechnic Institute", Ukraine.
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.81.09.16

Published 2024-09-30

Keywords

  • innovative technologies, critical thinking, students, professional readiness, pedagogical innovations.

How to Cite

Chashechnikova, O., Odintsova, O., Hordiienko, I., Danylchuk, O., & Popova, L. (2024). Innovative technologies for the development of critical thinking in students. Amazonia Investiga, 13(81), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.81.09.16

Copyright (c) 2024 Olga Chashechnikova, Oksana Odintsova, Iryna Hordiienko, Oksana Danylchuk, Liudmyla Popova

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The article reveals the content and level of critical thinking; the key provisions of the philosophy of education, on which the organization of the development of critical thinking of students of higher education should be based, are highlighted; the levels of the process of formation of critical thinking skills and the most important factors and components of the development of critical thinking are considered. The methodological foundations of the research are: leading propositions of the theory of scientific knowledge; general scientific principles of historicism, systematicity, and scientificity; conceptual provisions of pedagogical, psychological, and sociological sciences; ideas of experience based on the simultaneous study of pedagogical, socio-cultural and economic phenomena; philosophical and pedagogical ideas of the development of modern education. The methodological basis of the research is presented on four hierarchically subordinated levels: philosophical, general scientific, specifically scientific, and technological. The diagnostics of the system for improving students' critical thinking and the professional readiness of future specialists allowed us to talk about integrated indicators of the formation of the professional readiness of future specialists and increasing the level of critical thinking of students at the formative stage of the experiment. The increase in students' critical thinking and the formation of professional readiness of future specialists by all indicators is 15%, which is a positive result. Positive changes in the levels of student's critical thinking and the formation of professional readiness of future EG specialists compared to CG were revealed. Increasing the level of this readiness among EG students is due to the introduction of the author's system for improving students' critical thinking with the use of innovative technologies. The conclusion emphasizes that the use of innovative technologies increases the level of critical thinking of students and their professional readiness.

PDF EPUB HTML

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Buinytska, O., Varchenko-Trotsenko, L., & Hrytseliak, B. (2020). Digitization of higher education institutions. Educological Discourse, 1(28), 64-79. https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2020.1.6
  2. Dychkivska, I. M. (2015). Innovative pedagogical technologies: Textbook (3rd ed.). Academician. https://eltutor.at.ua/Podskazki/Dychkivska.pdf
  3. Havrilova, L. H., & Topolnik, Y. V. (2017). Digital culture, digital literacy, digital competence as the modern educational phenomena. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 5(61), 1-14. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ITZN_2017_61_5_3
  4. Kharchenko, S. Ya. (2019). Innovations in pedagogical education in the conditions of today's challenges: monograph. Kyiv: Talkom. https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/29717/1/V.Proshkin_mon_FITU.pdf
  5. Knysh, I., Budanova, O., Vakulenko, S., Syrotina, O., & Popychenko, S. (2023). Innovative educational technologies as a way of higher education enhancement. Amazonia Investiga, 12(68), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.68.08.2
  6. Koval, N. V. (2016). Interactive teaching technologies as a way of forming professional competencies of the future managers. Professional and Applied Didactics, 1, 70-77. http://188.190.43.194:7980/jspui/bitstream/123456789/588/1/PPD-1-10.pdf
  7. Kovalenko, V. V., Marienko, M. V., & Sukhikh, A. S. (2021). Use of augmented and virtual reality tools in a general secondary education institution in the context of blended learning. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 86(6), 70-86. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v86i6.4664
  8. Kuchai, O., & Demianiuk, A. (2021). Modern technologies of distance learning. Humanitarian studies: history and pedagogy, 2, 77-85. http://dspace.wunu.edu.ua/bitstream/316497/46142/1/КУЧАЙ.PDF
  9. Liakisheva, A. V., Vitiuk, V. V., & Kashubiak, I. O. (2022). Casebook of methods and techniques of critical thinking development technology in the New Ukrainian school: Teaching method manual. Lutsk: FOP Ivanyuk V. P. https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/21285/1/casebook.pdf
  10. Minsky, M. (2007). The emotion machine: Commonsense thinking, artificial intelligence, and the future of the human mind. New York: Simon & Schuster. https://acortar.link/FjOQWI
  11. Negroponte, N. (1996). Being Digital. New York: Knopf Paperback edition, 272.
  12. Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 219-225. https://acortar.link/7XqJJ0
  13. Plakhotnik, O., Zlatnikov, V., Strazhnikova, I., Bidyuk, N., Shkodyn, A., & Kuchai, O. (2023). Use of information technologies for quality training of future specialists. Amazonia Investiga, 12(65), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.65.05.5
  14. Poddenezhnyi, O. (2021). Management of Digital Transformation in Education: Modern Scientific Discourse. Scientific Papers NaUKMA. Economics, 6(1), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.18523/2519-4739.2021.6.1.105-110
  15. Prosalova, V., Hryhoshkina, Y., Ivanyshyn, M., Stepanenko, O., & Zamsha, A. (2022). Gamification, coaching, scribbling, storytelling in Ukrainian literature classes: innovative potential and effectiveness of application. Amazonia Investiga, 11(55), 327-333. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.55.07.34
  16. Puhach, S., Avramenko, K., Michalchenko, N., Chychuk, A., Kuchai, O., & Demchenko, I. (2021). Formation of Specialists’ Legal Competence in the System of Life Long Education. Romanian Magazine for Multidimensional Education, 13(4), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.4/472
  17. Rebukha, L., & Polishchuk, V. (2020). Ukrainian society and COVID-19: The influence of the pandemic on educational processes in higher school. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 120-127. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/165
  18. Rebukha, L., Bilous, I., Brik, R., Demyaniuk, A., Savytska, V., Krychkivska, O., & Kavetskyi, V. (2022). Innovative learning technologies in the conditions of modernization of modern education: Monograph. Ternopil: ZUNU. http://dspace.wunu.edu.ua/bitstream/316497/48105/3/монографія_Інноваційні%20технології%20навчання%20в%20умовах%20модернізації%20сучасної%20освіти.pdf
  19. Shetelya, N., Oseredchuk, O., Cherkasov, V., Kravchuk, O., Yarova, L., & Kuchai, O. (2023). Competency approach in preparing professionals in an innovative educational environment in higher education. Revista Conrado, 19(S3), 298-307. https://conrado.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/conrado/article/view/3512
  20. Shunkov, V., Marushko, L., Mykhailov, V., Lutsenko, Y., & Teslenko, S. (2023). Ways of implementing information technologies in professional training of future specialists. Amazonia Investiga, 12(62), 140-148. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.62.02.12
  21. Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and Technology: Key issues and debates. London, Bloomsbury, 232. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/education-and-technology-9781350145566/
  22. Terno, S. T. (2023). Critical thinking and innovative strategies in history education: A guide. Zaporizhzhia: Zaporizhia National University. https://dspace.znu.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/12345/13540/1/0053505.pdf
  23. Yurchak, H. M. (2020). Application of the technology for the development of critical thinking of students in the process of study of the discipline "Ukrainian language for professional communication." Transcarpathian Philological Studies, 1(13), 127-131. https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/32596
  24. Zaitaseva, D. (2022). Editorial: Artificial intelligence as a new form of life: digital evolution in writing. Amazonia Investiga, 11(60), 7-9. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.60.12.0
  25. Zaspa, H. O. (2021). Concentric information technology for the organization of digital transformation of educational activities of higher education institutions. (Unpublished candidate of technical sciences dissertation). Cherkasy State Technological University. https://er.chdtu.edu.ua/bitstream/ChSTU/1985/11/Дисертація%20Заспа%20Г.О..pdf