Vol. 13 No. 81 (2024)
Articles

Industrial research and development capacity building

Sakgasem Ramingwong
Chiang Mai University – Thailand.
Bio
Apichat Sopadang
Chiang Mai University – Thailand.
Bio
Tanyanuparb Anantana
Chiang Mai University – Thailand.
Bio
Runchana Sinthavalai
Prince of Songkla University – Thailand.
Bio
Salinee Santiteerakul
Chiang Mai University – Thailand.
Bio

Published 2024-09-30

Keywords

  • Research and development (R&D), Triple-Helix model, R&D roadmap, R&D blueprint, Thailand.

How to Cite

Ramingwong, S., Sopadang, A., Anantana, T., Sinthavalai, R., & Santiteerakul, S. (2024). Industrial research and development capacity building. Amazonia Investiga, 13(81), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.81.09.1

Abstract

Thailand faces significant challenges in aligning academic research with industrial needs and fostering robust R&D capabilities within businesses. The Industrial Research and Development Capacity Building (IRDCap) initiative was implemented to address these issues and enhance Thailand's innovation ecosystem. The program employs a dual approach: Train-the-Trainer (TTT) to develop academic expertise, and IRDCap Consulting to provide tailored support to businesses. It utilizes a comprehensive framework for developing R&D blueprints and roadmaps, supported by a central digital platform for monitoring and communication. Over five years, IRDCap trained 489 trainers and engaged 201 companies across various sectors, predominantly in agriculture and food. The program generated a valuation of 241.2 million US dollars, stimulated 28.1 million US dollars in investment, and created over 750 high-value jobs. Case studies demonstrate successful implementation of R&D roadmaps leading to product innovations and market expansion. IRDCap effectively bridges the gap between academic knowledge and industrial application, contributing significantly to Thailand's R&D capacity. The program's success highlights the importance of structured, collaborative approaches in fostering innovation, the effectiveness of the Triple-Helix model in driving economic development, and the need for continued adaptation to dynamic business environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Alshammari, K. H., & Alshammari, A. F. (2023). Managing digital transformation in a global environment: The role of national culture. Amazonia Investiga, 12(68), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.68.08.11
  2. Alston, J. M. (2010). The benefits from agricultural research and development, innovation, and productivity growth. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, 31. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  3. Armstrong, C., Shieh, J., & Zielinski, P. (2019). Increasing the return on investment from federally-funded research and development. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 20(1), 4-7.
  4. Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: the integration of local 'sticky' and global 'ubiquitous' knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77-86.
  5. Barbosa, G. F., Shiki, S. B., & da Silva, I. B. (2020). R&D roadmap for process robotization driven to the digital transformation of the industry 4.0. Concurrent Engineering, 28(4), 290-304.
  6. Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1-67.
  7. Bruneel, J., d'Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858-868.
  8. Carvalho, M. M., Fleury, A., & Lopes, A. P. (2013). An overview of the literature on technology roadmapping (TRM): Contributions and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(7), 1418-1437.
  9. Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 475-491.
  10. Dolińska, M. (2022). Open Innovation-Driven Business Processes of Crowdsourcing in Internet Markets. In Science, Business and Universities (pp. 31-45). Routledge.
  11. Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Wunsch-Vincent, S., & León, L. R. (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022: What is the Future of Innovation-driven Growth?. Geneva, Switzerland: WIPO.
  12. Elmquist, M., Fredberg, T., & Ollila, S. (2009). Exploring the field of open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3), 326-345.
  13. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
  14. Evenson, R. E., Waggoner, P. E., & Ruttan, V. W. (1979). Economic benefits from research: An example from agriculture. Science, 205(4411), 1101-1107.
  15. Intarakumnerd, P. (2019). Thailand's middle-income trap: Firms' technological upgrading and innovation and government policies. Seoul Journal of Economics, 32(1).
  16. Intarakumnerd, P., Chairatana, P. A., & Tangchitpiboon, T. (2002). National innovation system in less successful developing countries: the case of Thailand. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1445-1457.
  17. Karaveg, C., Thawesaengskulthai, N., & Chandrachai, A. (2014). Evaluation model for research and development commercialization capability. Production and Manufacturing Research, 2(1), 586-602.
  18. Kuznetsova, N., Tkachuk, V., Obikhod, S., Vlasenko, T., Samborska, O., & Chorna, L. (2022). Human capital development in a creative economy. Amazonia Investiga, 11(54), 349-356. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.54.06.33
  19. Lundvall, B. Å., & Borrás, S. (1997). The globalising learning economy: Implications for innovation policy. European Union, Luxembourg.
  20. Martinez-Contreras, R. M., Hernandez-Mora, N. C., Vargas-Leguizamon, Y. R., & Borja-Barrera, S. M. (2022). Pestel Analysis and the Porter's Five Forces: An Integrated Model of Strategic Sectors. In Handbook of Research on Organizational Sustainability in Turbulent Economies (pp. 292-314). IGI Global.
  21. Mehand, M. S., Al-Shorbaji, F., Millett, P., & Murgue, B. (2018). The WHO R&D Blueprint: 2018 review of emerging infectious diseases requiring urgent research and development efforts. Antiviral Research, 159, 63-67.
  22. Mehlman, S. (2024). 2024 R&D Trends Forecast: Results from the Innovation Research Interchange's Annual Survey. Research-Technology Management, 67(1), 22-33.
  23. Murga Pinillos, A. Y. (2024). University-industry open innovation: main enablers and practices based on a scoping review. International Journal of Innovation Science, 67(1), 22-33.
  24. Opassuwan, T., & Wannamakok, W. (2024). Deciphering the determinants of firm's engagement with universities: An insight into the Thai industrial landscape. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100248.
  25. Pairsuwan, R. (2023). The roles of science and technology park in the entrepreneurial ecosystem: A case study of the Northern Science Park, Thailand (Doctoral dissertation), University of Southampton.
  26. Pasaribu, R. D., Shalsabila, D., & Djatmiko, T. (2023). Revamping business strategy using Business Model Canvas (BMC), SWOT analysis, and TOWS matrix. Heritage and Sustainable Development, 5(1), 1-18.
  27. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D'este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., & Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442.
  28. Phongthiya, T., Malik, K., Niesten, E., & Anantana, T. (2022). Innovation intermediaries for university-industry R&D collaboration: Evidence from science parks in Thailand. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(6), 1885-1920.
  29. Poonjan, A., Tanner, A. N., & Andersen, P. D. (2022). How regional factors influence the performance of science and technology parks: A comparative analysis of regional science parks in Thailand. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 30(2), 364-386.
  30. Rennings, K., Kemp, R., Bartolomeo, M., Hemmelskamp, J., & Hitchens, D. (2003). Blueprints for an integration of science, technology and environmental policy (BLUEPRINT). Mannheim, Germany Center for European Economic Management GmbH (ZEW).
  31. Rizki, S., & Wijaya, F. (2024). Business development strategy using canvas business model and SWOT analysis on Bedroomstore. id. Journal of Management Science, 7(1), 371-378.
  32. Siripitakchai, N., & Miyazaki, K. (2015). Thailand's national research universities (NRUs) and their University-Industry Linkages (UILs) based on university-industry co-publications (UICs). Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) (pp. 287-294). IEEE.
  33. Suttipun, M., & Insee, K. (2024). R&D intensity and firm performance of SME firms in Thailand: the moderating role of firm size. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1).
  34. Thawesaengskulthai, N., Chatmarathong, A., & Koiwanit, J. (2024). Impact and policy supporting Thailand innovation driven enterprise: orchestrating university innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystem with public and private stakeholders. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1).
  35. Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2021). Regional innovation policies for new path development–beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views. European Planning Studies, 26(9), 1779-1795.
  36. Wannakul, R., Pathumnakul, S., & Arunyanart, S. (2019). Factors Affecting Decision to Select Government R&D Support Projects for SMEs. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 639.
  37. Wongwanich, M. (2022). Firm, innovation, competitiveness and science park development in Thailand (Doctoral dissertation), University of Birmingham.