Vol. 13 No. 80 (2024)
Articles

The impact of decentralization on regional development in Ukraine: challenges and opportunities in the post-war era

Yurii Orel
Education and Research Institute "Institute of Public Administration", V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine.
Bio
Oleg Kulinich
Education and Research Institute "Institute of Public Administration", V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine.
Bio
Serhii Korniievskyi
Ukrainian State University of Science and Technology, Ukraine.
Bio
Svitlana Serohina
National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.
Bio
Liliya Gryshko
National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.
Bio

Published 2024-08-30

Keywords

  • regional policy, local self-government, territorial communities, sustainability, budget planning, administrative and territorial reform.

How to Cite

Orel, Y., Kulinich, O., Korniievskyi, S., Serohina, S., & Gryshko, L. (2024). The impact of decentralization on regional development in Ukraine: challenges and opportunities in the post-war era. Amazonia Investiga, 13(80), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.80.08.9

Abstract

Decentralization, the transfer of power and resources from central to local governments, has been a key outcome of Ukraine's administrative reform. At the same time, many processes were implemented based on the experience of European countries, which emphasised Ukraine's European integration aspirations. This article examines the achievements and challenges of decentralization, particularly in the context of post-war reconstruction. Through content analysis of relevant literature, the study finds that newly formed territorial communities have gained greater financial autonomy and decision-making power, fostering local development initiatives. However, legislative gaps, lack of experience, and coordination challenges with regional authorities persist. The study concludes that aligning with European decentralization models and adapting legislation accordingly are crucial for Ukraine's regional development and successful post-war recovery. It emphasizes the need for further research on the interplay between decentralization and regional socioeconomic progress, especially considering the unique context of ongoing conflict. In conclusion, it is substantiated that adherence to the European vector of development and approximation of domestic legislation to the best European standards is the key to the success of the country as a whole and the formation of strong, economically viable regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Arefiev, S., Zhyhlei, I., Pereguda, Y., Kryvokulska, N., & Lushchyk, M. (2023). The use of Digital Technologies to Ensure Environmental Safety in the Context of the Green Economy Development. Revista de la Universidad del Zulia, 15(42), 353-369. https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.42.20
  2. Bedrynets, M. (2021). Financial decentralization in Ukraine: Current state and development prospects. Scientific Notes of Ostroh Academy National University, "Economics" Series, 1(21(49)), 48-55. DOI: 10.25264/2311-5149-2021-21(49)-48-55
  3. Bobro, N., Bielikov, V., Matveyeva, M., Salamakha, A., & Kharchun, V. (2024). Advancing Public Administration: Enforcing Strategic Methods and Utilising Tools. Archives des Sciences, 74(3), 201-206. https://doi.org/10.62227/as/74332
  4. Bobro, N. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on the global economy. International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 3(2), 95-98. https://irjems.org/irjems-v3i2p113.html
  5. Bruzelius, C. (2020). Local government responses to EU citizens’ integration needs. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(9), 2187-2205. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1724774
  6. Buriak, I., Kalynovskyy, A., Pasko, M., Saienko, V., & Zavolichna, T. (2023a). Actual problems of management and public administration in modern globalization processes. Pacific Business Review (International), 16(4), 122-133.
  7. Buriak, I., Skaletska, Z., Rezvorovych, K., & Gigin, O. (2023b). The Phenomenon of Legal Culture as a Component of the Legal System. Futurity Economics & Law, 3(2), 41-61. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2023.06.25.03
  8. Chacha, M. (2019). European Union membership status and decentralization: A top-down approach. Regional & Federal Studies, 30(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2019.1632296
  9. Chernadchuk, T., Kozachok, I., Maletov, D., Pankratova, V., & Steblianko, A. (2023). Organizational and legal provision of the control function of the local self-government body in conditions of sustainable development. Amazonia Investiga, 12(62), 258-272. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.62.02.26
  10. Fabuš, M., Dubrovina, N., Guryanova, L., Chernova, N., & Zyma, O. (2019). Strengthening financial decentralization: driver or risk factor for sustainable socio-economic development of territories? Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(2), 875-890. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(6)
  11. Gryshchenko, I., Bondar, Y., Serohina, S., Bodrova, I., & Stohova, O. (2022). Building the capacity of territorial communities by revealing their latent potential. Amazonia Investiga, 11(53), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.53.05.5
  12. Guderjan, M., & Verhelst, T. (2021). The integration cycle: Theorising european integration of local government. In Local Government in the European Union (pp. 21–43). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74382-6_2
  13. Ishchenko, Y., Podolianchuk, O., Struk, N., Yasyshena, V., & Stender, S. (2021). Accounting of real costs for the production of organic food: world experience and practice of Ukraine. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 12(6), 610-631. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v12i6.1776
  14. Kichurchak, M. (2023). Information and communication technologies sector development as a factor of forming creative industries in the European Union countries: Experience of the structural transformation for Ukraine. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(48), 399-408. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3934
  15. Krap, A., Bataiev, S., Bobro, N., Kozub, V., & Hlevatska, N. (2024). Examination of digital advancements: Their influence on contemporary corporate management methods and approaches. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024spe026
  16. Kuczabski, A., Aleinikova, O., Poberezhets, H., Tolchieva, H., Saienko, V., & Skomorovskyi, A. (2023). The analysis of the effectiveness of regional development management. International Journal for Quality Research, 17(3), 695-706. https://doi.org/10.24874/ijqr17.03-05
  17. Kyriacou, A. P., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2019). Local decentralization and the quality of public services in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 145(2), 755-776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02113-z
  18. Lisova, O., Shevyakov, M., & Orlova, O. (2021). Administrative-territorial reform in ukraine: Normative-legal aspect of decentralization reform in Ukraine. The Journal of International Legal Communication, 1, 102-124. https://doi.org/10.32612/uw.27201643.2021.1.pp.102-124
  19. Lunkina, T., & Boyko, O. (2020). The current state of the decentralization process and its prospects for development in Ukraine. Modern Economics, 19(1), 114-119. https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.v19(2020)-19
  20. Maiev, A. (2022). Ensuring regional development under decentralization: French experience for Ukraine. Border Universities Network Studies, 6, 97-119. https://doi.org/10.15290/sup.2022.06.08
  21. Maryanti, S., Handra, H., & Yonnedi, E. (2022). The link between fiscal decentralization and unemployment evidence from Indonesia. ADPEBI International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(2), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.54099/aijbs.v2i2.314
  22. Mueller, S., & Hechter, M. (2019). Centralization through decentralization? The crystallization of social order in the European Union. Territory, Politics, Governance, 9(1), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2019.1676300
  23. Pasquier, R. (2021). Devolution, functional decentralization or recentralization? Convergence and divergence in the European territorial governance. In A Research Agenda for Regional and Local Government (pp. 49–62). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106644.00009
  24. Rudenko, L., Lisovskyi, S., & Maruniak, E. (2020). Dilemmas of regional development in Ukraine. Ukrainian Geographical Journal, (3), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2020.03.036
  25. Shevchuk, O. (2023). Digitalization of public administration: Experience of the EU member states and prospects for Ukraine. In Digital trends and anti-corruption reforms in public administration. Baltija Publishing. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-369-9-17
  26. Slavinskaite, N., Novotny, M., & Gedvilaitė, D. (2020). Evaluation of the fiscal decentralization: Case studies of European Union. Engineering Economics, 31(1), 84-92. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.31.1.23065
  27. Slijepčević, S., Rajh, E., & Budak, J. (2020). Determinants of corruption pressures on local government in the E.U. Economic Research, 33(1), 3492-3508. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2020.1774793
  28. Torrisi, G. (2021). A multidimensional analysis of the link between decentralization and development. In Handbook on Decentralization, Devolution and the State (pp. 287-302). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839103285.00025
  29. Tselios, V., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2022). Can decentralization help address poverty and social exclusion in Europe? Territory, Politics, Governance, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2022.2098174
  30. Uzun, Y., & Koch, S. (2020). Decentralization vs centralization: scenarios of regional development of ukraine in the context of internal stability establishment. Strategic Review, (13), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2020.1.15
  31. Vaskivska, K. (2020). The development of the regional innovation system in Ukraine under decentralization. Journal of Management and Financial Sciences, (40), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.33119/jmfs.2020.40.4
  32. Vasyltsiv, T., Biletska, I., & Mulska, O. (2021). Organizational and financial instruments of decentralization and development of united territorial communities in Ukraine: Poland’s experience. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 43(2), 276-287. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2021.24
  33. Wichowska, A. (2021). The degree of fiscal decentralization in European Union countries in different stages of the economic cycle. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(2), 198-208. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.9.2(13)
  34. Zhuravel, Y. V., & Diorditsa, I. V. (2023). Current European models of power decentralization and prospects for their implementation in Ukraine. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, (11), 343-347. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2023-11/83