Vol. 13 No. 79 (2024)
Articles

Public art as a driver of change: exploring its socio-political impact in the modern era

Olga Galchynska
Mykhailo Boichuk Kyiv State Academy of Decorative Applied Arts and Design, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Bio
Liudomyr Filonenko
Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Drohobych, Ukraine.
Bio
Rosslan Lozev
New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Bio
Mykhailo Sydor
Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Drohobych, Ukraine.
Bio
Valentyna Drotenko
Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Drohobych, Ukraine.
Bio

Published 2024-07-30

Keywords

  • artworks, challenges, community, impact indicators, urban environment.

How to Cite

Galchynska, O., Filonenko, L., Lozev, R., Sydor, M., & Drotenko, V. (2024). Public art as a driver of change: exploring its socio-political impact in the modern era. Amazonia Investiga, 13(79), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.79.07.17

Abstract

This article explores the socio-political impact of public art installations. It interprets impact indicators, describes public art as a result of socio-political transformations, reveals the characteristics of national identity through public art, studies public art during war, and compares the symbolism of public art installations across different countries. The research employed a descriptive methodology, including literature analysis, visual and document analysis, theoretical assessment of impact indicators, historical and comparative analysis, and content analysis. The findings demonstrate that public art is a crucial cultural phenomenon that shapes collective memory, national identity, and cultural heritage. The study identifies various types of public art and highlights the growing popularity of digital and multimedia art. It also distinguishes impact indicators of public art installations and proves that public art plays a vital role in stimulating socio-political transformations, shaping cultural identity, advocating for positive change, increasing civic engagement, and addressing social justice issues. The research emphasizes the short-term and long-term effects of public art installations and pays special attention to their role during wartime.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Alimi Selmani, T. (2024). The influence of music on the development of a child: Perspectives on the influence of music on child development. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i1.162
  2. Al-Zadjali, Z. (2024) The significance of art in revealing a culture’s identity and multiculturalism. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 12, 232-250. doi: 10.4236/jss.2024.121015
  3. Archer, A. (2024). How public statues wrong: Affective artifacts and affective injustice. Topoi, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10025-y
  4. Arranz Otaegui, I., & Moore, K. C. (2022). Visual art and propaganda ecologies in the Basque country: A sample of Guernica motifs from the Benedictine sticker archives (1978–1989). Arts, 11(3), Article 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts11030062
  5. Ballard, S., & Linden, L. (2019). Spiral Jetty, geoaesthetics, and art: Writing the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review, 6(1-2), 142-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019619839443
  6. Banerjee, P. (2023). Sustainable Art and Cultural Heritage: Balancing Conservation and Innovation. Expressions: A Journal of Art and Culture, 1(01). https://doi.org/10.57939/expressions.v1i01.2
  7. Bashovski, M., & Rossi, N. (2023). Introduction: political subjectivity in times of crisis. Globalizations, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2023.2186102
  8. Beinart, K. (2020). Don’t look back: The challenges of public art and meanings of authenticity in heritage contexts. Public Art Dialogue, 10(2), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/21502552.2020.1790873
  9. Bekh, Y., Romankova, L., Vashkevych, V., Yaroshenko, A., & Lipin, M. (2021). Artistic aspects of embodiment of postmodern theater practices in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Postmodern Openings, 12(1Sup1), 313-322. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1Sup1/287
  10. Bilozub, L., Tymoshenko, M., Bedrina, N., Voronova, N., & Andrushchenko, T. (2023). Art history research in scientific discourse. Revista Eduweb, 17(1), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2023.17.01.16
  11. Blatt-Gross, C. (2023). Short- and long-term outcomes of community-based art education among students in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020166
  12. Burdman, J. (2020). Universality without consensus: Jean-François Lyotard on politics in postmodernity. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 46(3), 302-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453719854215
  13. Cheng, H., & Worrall, J. (2021). Unfolding China’s urban development: The implementation of public art in Beijing and Shanghai. Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 3(1), Article 1025. https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.v3i1.1025
  14. Cheng, Y., Chen, J., Li, J., Li, L., Hou, G., & Xiao, X. (2023). Research on the preference of public art design in urban landscapes: Evidence from an event-related potential study. Land, 12(10), Aricle 1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12101883
  15. Chused, R. (2020). Charging Bull, Fearless Girl, Artistic Composition, and Copyright. NYU Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law, 10(1). https://jipel.law.nyu.edu/charging-bull-fearless-girl-artistic-composition-and-copyright/
  16. Conduru, R. (2023). Roda and Terreiro: The Historiography of Brazil’s Visual Arts at the Crossroads of Globalization. Arts, 12(3), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts12030103
  17. Costello, D. (2021). Conceptual art and aesthetic ideas. Kantian Review, 26(4), 603-618. doi: 10.1017/S1369415421000388
  18. de Waal, C. (2024). The significance of Charles Sanders Peirce for the twenty-first century. In C. de Waal (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Charles S. Peirce. Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197548561.002.0007
  19. Demir Türközü, C., & Caliskan, O. (2021). Mural as public art in urban fabric: An attempt to link configurational approach to perceptual morphology. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 2(Special Issue), 147-170. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2si040
  20. dos Reis, M., & Elias, H. (2020). Advertising urban murals: an analysis from social semiotics. CAP - Public Art Journal, 1(2), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.48619/cap.v1i2.98
  21. Downey, H., & Sherry, J. F. (2023). Public art tourism: Atmospheric stories in city margins. Annals of Tourism Research, 101, Article 103606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103606
  22. Grindon, G., Williams, J., & Hay, D. (2023). Mapping British public monuments related to slavery. Slavery & Abolition, 45(2), 384-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144039X.2023.2264837
  23. Huang, Y., & Zheng, G. (2023). The influence and function of the public art industry on aesthetic education under the background of new curriculum reform. Herança, 6(2), 174-190. https://doi.org/10.52152/heranca.v6i2.758
  24. Husselman, T.-A., Filho, E., Zugic, L. W., Threadgold, E., & Ball, L. J. (2024). Stimulus complexity can enhance art appreciation: Phenomenological and psychophysiological evidence for the pleasure-interest model of aesthetic liking. Journal of Intelligence, 12(4). Article 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12040042
  25. Iannelli, L., & Marelli, C. M. (2019). Performing civic cultures: Participatory public art and its publics. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(5), 630-646. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877919849964
  26. Inácio, S. (2020). Sculpture and sustainability. CAP - Public Art Journal, 2(1), 120-131. https://doi.org/10.48619/cap.v2i1.357
  27. Johnstone, J., & O’Hare, M. (2023). Art for policy and policy for art. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 30(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2023.2254631
  28. Katsambekis, G., Iliadis, C., Balampanidis, I., & Papataxiarchis, E. (2022). Emotions of protest in times of crisis: representation, dislocation and remedy in the Greek ‘squares movement.’ Political Research Exchange, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2022.2035192
  29. Kecheng, Z., & Hussain, M. (2023). The historical origin and public manifestation of public art. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 7(3), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2023(7-III)06
  30. Kolinets, L. (2023). International Financial Markets of the Future: Technological Innovations and Their Impact on the Global Financial System. Futurity of Social Sciences, 1(3), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.57125/FS.2023.09.20.01
  31. Kopiievska, O., Haidukevych, K., Pashkevych, M., Kozlovska, M., & Korolenko, E. (2023). Sociocultural practice in the discourse of creative industries development. Postmodern Openings, 14(1), 01-15. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/14.1/600
  32. Korzilius, L. (2022). The Vietnam Veterans Memorial – Presenting the Unpresentable. 5th International Conference of Contemporary Affairs in Architecture and Urbanism (ICCAUA-2022) (pp. 523-541). Analya: Alanya HEP University. https://doi.org/10.38027/ICCAUA2022EN0014
  33. Kot, S., Mozolevska, A., Polishchuk, O., & Stodolinska, Y. (2024). The discursive power of digital popular art during the Russo-Ukrainian war: Re/shaping visual narratives. Arts, 13(1), Article 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts13010038
  34. Kuznetsova, I. (2021). The feminist geopolitics of Donbas: The role of art in challenging bordering. Region, 10(1), 61-84. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27127996
  35. Leahy, E. L. (2024). State murals, protest murals, conflict murals: Evolving politics of public art in Ukraine. Arts, 13(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts13010001
  36. Lee, R., Hong, K., Chang, W., & Tan, A. W. K. (2020). Economic growth and the arts: A macroeconomic study. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1807203
  37. Marcondes, M. J. (2020). Public art and modernity. CAP - Public Art Journal, 1(2), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.48619/cap.v1i2.111
  38. McNally, D., McClymont, K., Brookes, E., Landau-Donnelly, F., Luger, J., Lanci, G., & Griffin, L. (2023). Planning, art, and aesthetics: Edited by Katie McClymont and Danny McNally. Planning Theory & Practice, 24(3), 389-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2023.2230046
  39. Mezzadri, P. (2021). Contemporary murals in the street and urban art field: Critical reflections between preventive conservation and restoration of public art. Heritage, 4(3), 2515-2525. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4030142
  40. Milani, T. M. (2022). Banksy’s walled off hotel and the mediatization of street art. Social Semiotics, 32(4), 545-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2022.2114730
  41. Milne, C., & Pojani, D. (2022). Public art in cities: what makes it engaging and interactive? Journal of Urban Design, 28(3), 296-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2022.2121272
  42. Mohd Hawari, A. D., & Mohd Noor, A. I. (2020). Project Based Learning Pedagogical Design in STEAM Art Education. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.11072
  43. Mosendz, O., Filimonova-Zlatohurska, Y., Pankiv, H., Bannikova, K., & Vlasiuk O. (2022). Problems and prospects of the development of Ukrainian art (realities of martial law). Amazonia Investiga, 11(58), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.58.10.8
  44. Müller, A.-L. (2019). Voices in the city. On the role of arts, artists and urban space for a just city. Cities, 91, 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.004
  45. Olaiya, T. A. (2022). Shifting the goalposts: Postcolonial Africa and the west in the global “two publics” of the development paradigm. Sage Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221097927
  46. Pedroso, J. E. P., Gicole, C., & Sarches, A. (2023). Learning local history and culture through museum visits. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v1i3.36
  47. Petronienė, S., & Juzelėnienė, S. (2022). Community Engagement via Mural Art to Foster a Sustainable Urban Environment. Sustainability, 14(16), Article 10063. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610063
  48. Popescu, D. I., & Schult, T. (2019). Performative Holocaust commemoration in the 21st century. Holocaust Studies, 26(2), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17504902.2019.1578452
  49. Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2022). Reflections on the genre of philosophical art installations. Adaptive Behavior, 30(6), 589-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123221133189
  50. Røyseng, S. (2021). Public art debates as boundary struggles. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 28(5), 581-594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2021.2009472
  51. Rudenko, O., & Kharkov, S. (2023). Philosophical studies of the future in the context of postmodern knowledge: theory, methodology. Futurity Philosophy, 2(3), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2023.09.30.01
  52. Simoniti, V. (2021). Art as political discourse. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 61(4), 559-574. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayab018
  53. Smetzer, M. A. (2024). Replacing settler spaces: The transformational power of indigenous public art. Arts, 13(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts13020060
  54. Smith, T. (2019). Philosophy in the Artworld: Some Recent Theories of Contemporary Art. Philosophies, 4(3), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies4030037
  55. Sokołowska-Paryż, M. (2022). Un-doing the Vietnam War Legacy: Monumentalizing Second World War Veterans to Legitimize Contemporary US Military Interventions. Journal of War & Culture Studies, 16(3), 312-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17526272.2021.2019373
  56. Stoltz, B. (2023). A nature thing: What does contemporary ecological art produce? Arts, 12(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts12020067
  57. Tabor, S. M., Van Bavel, M., Fellner, K. D., Schwartz, K. D., Black, T., Black Water, C., & Pepion, J. (2023). Healing, empowering, engaging, learning, and decolonizing through culture: Living wellness, resilience, and resurgence in the classroom through creative arts. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 38(1), 86-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/08295735221147322
  58. Tampubolon, M. (2022). Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and its impact on global geopolitics. European Scientific Journal, 18(20), 48. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2022.v18n20p48
  59. Thompson, J., & Day, J. (2020). Understanding the impact and value of temporary public art sculpture trails. Local Economy, 35(3), 186-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094220921811
  60. Timko, T. (2021). The institutionalization of independent public art and its influence on social taste. SAUC – Street Art and Urban Creativity, 7(2), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.25765/sauc.v7i2.396
  61. Topaz, C. M., Higdon, J., Epps-Darling, A., Siau, E., Kerkhoff, H., Mendiratta, S., & Young, E. (2022). Race- and gender-based under-representation of creative contributors: art, fashion, film, and music. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 221. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01239-9
  62. Vdovichena, O., Tkachuk, S., Zhuzhukina, N., & Lukianykhina, O. (2022). The use of information in the world economy: globalization trends. Futurity Economics&Law, 2(4), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2022.12.25.01
  63. Villanueva, I. I., Li, N., Jilk, T., Renner, J., Van Matre, B. R., & Brossard, D. (2024). When science meets art on Instagram: Examining the effects of visual art on emotions, interest, and social media engagement. Science Communication, 46(2), 210-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470241228279
  64. Wen, X., & White, P. (2020). The role of landscape art in cultural and national identity: Chinese and European comparisons. Sustainability, 12(13), 5472. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135472
  65. Young, T., & Marshall, M. T. (2023). An investigation of the use of augmented reality in public art. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 7(9), Article 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7090089
  66. Zebracki, M. (2020) Public art, sexuality, and critical pedagogy. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 44(2), 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1661365
  67. Zhang, K., Hsiao, T. C., & Tian, Q. (2023). A probe into the developmental pattern of public art education in colleges and universities from the perspective of new media. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1138950. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1138950