Value-semantic filling of the family concept and value orientations of Russian modern young people family life
Abstract
The modern family acts as a social phenomenon that makes up the fundamental principle of human existence, as a system of values and norms of behavior. The article notes that in recent years a delicate balance has been broken between the forces creating a family and the forces destroying it, in favor of the lattest, powerful factors have appeared to destabilize family and marriage relations: property differentiation and a decline in the living standard of the population, on the one hand, and the loss of moral orientation in many people, on the other hand. Many family functions have suffered qualitative changes. The work reveals the problem of value-semantic filling of the «family» concept, the complexity of which is due to the need to specify the concepts of «family values» and «value orientations of family life», the analysis of scientific literature indicates the presence of different points of view regarding the definition of these categories in the conditions of transformation of modern society. The problems of transforming Russian society and ensuring its sustainable development makes it necessary to rethink the role of the family as a human living environment and the formation of social values.
Discussing family crisis, this is, a significant change in family values in the minds of people, we focus on the problem of the formation of family values, value orientations and life standards among young people.
Downloads
References
Antonov, A. I. (2004). The family as a social institution // Principles of Sociology. Ed. Efendi-ev A.G., Part II.
Arkhangelskiy, D. M. (1973). Ethical categories // Subject and system of ethics, Moscow – Sofia.
Asmolov, A. G. (1990). Psychology of personality: Textbook, M: Moscow state University Publ.
Baeva, L. V. (2004). Values of a changing world: Existential axiology of history: Monograph, Astrakhan: ASU.
Blyumkin, V. A. (1981). The World of moral values, M.: Knowledge.
Bratus, B. S. (1988). The semantic sphere of personality // Reading-book: personality psychol-ogy in the works of Russian psychologists, М: "Thought".
Donina, O. I. (2002). Family: pedagogical aspects of a social worker's activity. Textbook on the course of family science, Ulyanovsk: UlSU.
Drobnickiy, O. G. (1974). The concept of morality, M.: Knowledge.
Fromm, E. (1993). Psychoanalysis and Ethics: collection, Moscow: Republic.
Gavrilyuk, V. V. (2002). Dynamics of value orientations during the period of social transfor-mation, M.: "Science".
Glazkova, T. V. (2014). Family as a value-semantic model of culture // Vestnik MSUCS. No 6 (62).
Golod, S. I. (2008). Family and marriage: historical and sociological analysis, St. Petersburg : Peter.
Kagan, M. S. (1997). Philosophical theory of value, St Peterburg: Peter.
Karaseva, M. A. (1989). Moral norm – humanism // New in life, science, technology. Ser. «Ethics». No 11.
Kartseva, L. V. (2001). Family in Russia at the turn of the century, Kazan.
Khaertdinov I.M., Shvetsov A., Kuznetsov A., Aryabkina I.V., Donina O.I. (2019) Voca-tional training of air force officers: methodology of axiological approach // Amazonia Investi-ga. Vol. 8. No 19.
Kiryachek, E. A. (2009). Transformation of family values in Russia // Humanitarian and socio-economic sciences. No 5.
Kulyutkin, Yu. N. (2002). Value orientations and cognitive structures in teacher's activity, Sa-mara: Publishing house of SamSPU.
Khubiev, B. B. (2009). Family as a socially-valuable community of forms of human being: (main thesis of the dissertation) // SOTRe – social technologies, research. No 2.
Maslova, V. A. (2011). Concepts and values: the content of concepts, linguistic as a socio-value community of forms of human being: main representation // Scientific notes of the Tav-rida National University named after V.I. Vernadsky: Series «Philology. Social communica-tions». Volume 24 (63). No 2. Part 1.
Maslow, A. (1997). Psychology of Being: trans. from English, M.: K.
Michalik, M. (1978). Dialectics of the development of socialist morality: trans. from Polish, M.: Progress.
Petryakova, O. L. (2010). To the question of the analysis of the influence of socio-economic factors on the institution of the family in the Russian Federation / O. L. Petryakova // Econom-ics, statistics and computer science. Vestnik EMA. No 2.
Ryabov A.V., Kurbangaleeva E.Sh., M.: House of Intellectual Books.
Rickert, H. (1998). Natural Sciences and Cultural Sciences: translated from German, Moscow: Republic.
Sagatovsky, V. N. (1982). The scales of Themis and the court of conscience. Popular essays on ethics and aesthetics, M.: Mol. Guard.
Shakurov, R. Kh. (1998). Psychology of interpersonal relations in secondary vocational educa-tion, Kazan: Inst. specialist. Education RAE, 1998.
Shishkin, A. F., Shvartsman K. A. (1973). About some philosophical problems of ethics // Sub-ject and system of ethics, Moscow – Sofia.
The basic values of Russians: Social attitudes. Life strategies. Symbols Myths (2003)/ Ed.
Titov, V. A. (1988). Moral knowing, M.: Knowledge.
Turovskiy, M. B. (1997). Philosophical foundations of cultural studies. Ser.: Philosophers of Russia of the XX century, M.: Rosspen.
Vichev, V. (1978). Moral and social psyche [Text]: translated from the Bulgarian. Moscow: Progress.
Volzhina, O. I. (2001). The family as a sociocultural value of modern Russian society, M.: "Science". No 1.
Vyzhletsov, G. P. (1996). Axiology of culture, St. Petersburg: Peter.
.gif)
