Language as a political manipulation tool
Abstract
Unfortunately, human intelligence is increasingly becoming militant and destructive. A clear evidence is the full-scale invasion of Russia into Ukraine, centuries of enslavement of the Ukrainian people, destruction of Ukrainian culture and language. In fact, the current tragic events of the latest hybrid war exposed ethnocide and linguicide against Ukrainians. The aim of the article is to analyse the use of language as a manipulation tool for the realization of fundamental political interests. Research methods: historical method, content analysis, statistical analysis. The results of the study show that the hegemonic policy of the current Russian government is characterized by the aggressive hybrid war against Ukraine, which actively involves various manipulation tools, in particular language, in order to justify the occupation, violent means of domination and methods of control over its former colonies, in order to appropriate all the resources of the enslaved countries and peoples, in order to maintain the status of a global leader and dominate the world. Further research may focus on analysing the manifestations of the use of language as a manipulation tool by pro-Russian parties in Ukraine and other countries.
Downloads
References
Azhniuk, B. M. (2019). Language Policy: European Criteria and Ukraine. Ukrainian Linguistics, 49, 9-31. https://doi.org/10.17721/um/49(2019).9-31
Barrington, L. (2022). A new look at region, language, ethnicity and civic national identity in Ukraine. Europe-Asia Studies, 74(3), 360-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2022.2032606
Bezkorovaina, H. (2014). Language or “language”. Ukraine is young, 074. https://www.umoloda.kiev.ua/number/2466/188/87564#
Chupryn, A. H., & Perchyk, A. O. (2020). Implementation of Israel's experience in the language policy of Ukraine. Ukrainian language in jurisprudence: state, problems, prospects, 53-55. (File PDF). http://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/19703
Csernicskó, I. (2017). 7 Language Policy in Ukraine: The Burdens of the Past and the Possibilities of the Future. In Future Research Directions for Applied Linguistics (pp. 120-148). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783097135-008
Detector Media. (2022). Home page. https://detector.media/page/newsboard/
Dvirna, K. (2022). The Language Front of the Struggle in the Conditions of the Russian-Ukrainian War (2014-2022). Ukrainian language yesterday, today, tomorrow in Ukraine and the world (pp. 36-50). https://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/38863/Dvirna.pdf?sequence=1
Fedinec, C., & Csernicskó, I. (2017). Language Policy and National Feeling in Context Ukraine´ s Euromaidan, 2014-2016. Central European Papers, 5(1), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.25142/cep.2017.005
Hryshyna, N. M., & Bigary, M. I. (2019). State Language Policy in Ukraine: Content and Approaches to Implementation. Efficiency of Public Administration, 4(61), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.33990/2070-4011.61.2019.198502
Korolyov, I., & Grytsenko, S. (2022). Ecolinguistic Mode in the Language Policy of Ukraine. Sustainable Multilingualism, 20(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.2478/sm-2022-0001
Kulyk, V. (2022). Language and identity in Ukraine at the end of 2022. Zbruc. https://zbruc.eu/node/114247
Makarets, Yu. (2019a). The European context of the status language policy of Ukraine. Scientific notes of V. I. Vernadskyi Tavria National University. Series: Philology. Social communications, 30(69), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.32838/2663-6069/2019.3-1/09
Makarets, Yu. (2019b). State language policy of independent Ukraine Summary. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University, Series: Philology, 40(1), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.32841/2409-1154.2019.40.1.13
Mar-Molinero, C. (2020). The role of language in Spanish nation-building. In Nationalism and the Nation in the Iberian Peninsula (pp. 69-87). Routledge.
Mieliekiestsev, K., & Temirova, N. (2022). The Policy of Russianization of Ukraine and Other European Territories of Russian Empire: Comparative Analysis. Eminak: Scientific Quarterly Journal, 2(38), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.33782/eminak2022.2(38).580
Nekrecha, K., & Khalilov, R. (2022). “The Ukrainian language is a marker of “own-foreign”. Akhtem Seitablayev on “Russian peace” and the liberation of Crimea. Radio Svoboda. https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/akhtem-seitablaiev-interviu-mova-krym-viyna-zvilnennia/31997252.html
Overchuk, O. B., & Batiukh, A. V. (2021). Language Policy in Ukraine: The Experience of European Countries. “Modern Problems of Legal, Economic and Social Development of the State”: Abstracts of reports of the 10th International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 27th anniversary of the Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs (pp. 294-295). https://univd.edu.ua/science-issue/issue/5337
Rating group. (2022a). The sixth national survey. The language issue in Ukraine. https://ratinggroup.ua/files/ratinggroup/reg_files/rg_ua_1000_ua_032022_mova_press.pdf
Rating group. (2022b). Seventeenth national survey. Identity. Patriotism. Values. https://ratinggroup.ua/files/ratinggroup/reg_files/rg_ua_1000_independence_082022_xvii_press.pdf
Rawat, S. (2022). Politics of Language and Education: An evaluation of Tamil Separatism in the Sri Lankan civil war. Journal of Language and Linguistics in Society, 2(01), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.55529/jlls.21.1.8
Singh, M. P., & Dhussa, R. C. (2020). Reorganization of states and the politics of official languages in India. In: Brunn S. D., & Kehrein R. (eds.), Handbook of the Changing World Language Map (pp. 1509-1524). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02438-3_85
Turgeon, L., Bilodeau, A., White, S. E., Henderson, A., & Gagnon, A. G. (2021). Symbolic predispositions, interests and official languages legislation: exploring the principle-implementation gap in Canada. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 9(5), 916-934. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1691021
Zeller, J.P. (2022). Attitudes on languages, identities and politics at the Ukrainian Black Sea coast in 2020/21. Russian Linguistics, 46, 291-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-022-09264-7