Competitiveness assessment of ship repair enterprises in the coastal region

  • T. V. Turchaninova Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of FRC KSC RAS, Murmansk, Russia
  • V. E. Khrapov Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of FRC KSC RAS, Murmansk, Russia
  • A. M. Vasiliev Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of FRC KSC RAS, Murmansk, Russia
  • Yu. F. Kuranov Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of FRC KSC RAS, Murmansk, Russia
Keywords: ship repair enterprises, single and small-scale production, competitiveness, spatial interaction, coastal regions, marine economic activity

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to determine the conditions and assess the factors contributing to the competitiveness of machine-building enterprises with single and small-scale production in the field of ship repair and other infrastructure activities in the coastal region. The theoretical foundations for assessing the competitiveness of market economy subjects are examined, various methods of this assessment are investigated, and their positive and negative sides are revealed. An analysis of the basic foundations of the formation of competitiveness of shipyards in the coastal region (Murmansk region) was made in the process of the study. The author's technique is developed using quality indicators for assessing the competitiveness of ship-repair enterprises. The calculation of the competitiveness of these enterprises using the rating of quality indicators was made, the directions of its increase were determined. The proposed author's method allows to evaluate the ratings of ship repair enterprises used by shipowners when placing orders. The methods of induction, deduction, comparison and synthesis were used in the article; analysis of the competitiveness of ship repair enterprises as participants in the spatial interaction of enterprises providing marine economic activities and other infrastructure coastal enterprises was carried out using the above methods. Improving the competitiveness of ship repair enterprises will create conditions for increasing the spatial interaction of business entities of the fisheries complex, primarily, increasing the number of visits of fishing vessels to the Murmansk Sea Port. Returning the fishing fleet to service in the city of Murmansk will create additional jobs in all infrastructure enterprises (transshipment facilities, refrigeration facilities, ship repair, bunkering and supply), receive additional financial resources in budgets of all levels, and increase the participation of the fishing industry in the implementation of the country's Food Security Doctrine.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

T. V. Turchaninova, Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of FRC KSC RAS, Murmansk, Russia

PhD (Econ.), Senior Researcher, Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of FRC KSC RAS, Murmansk, Russia

V. E. Khrapov, Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of FRC KSC RAS, Murmansk, Russia

Doctor of Sciences (Econ.), Chief Researcher, Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of FRC KSC RAS, Murmansk, Russia

A. M. Vasiliev, Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of FRC KSC RAS, Murmansk, Russia

Doctor of Sciences (Econ.), Professor, Chief Researcher, Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of FRC KSC RAS, Murmansk, Russia

Yu. F. Kuranov, Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of FRC KSC RAS, Murmansk, Russia

PhD (Econ.), Leading Researcher, Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of FRC KSC RAS, Murmansk, Russia.

References

Azoev, G. L., Chelenkov, A. P. (2009). Competitive advantages of the company. Moscow: OJSC Printing house “News”.

Andreev, V. N. (2010). Conceptual model of managing the creation and development of competitive machine-building enterprises. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship 7:2(163):106-111.

Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of April 15, 2014 No. 328 “On Approval of the State Program of the Russian Federation “Development of Industry and Increasing Its Competitiveness”. (2014). Available at: http://consultant.ru//document/cons_dos_LAW_162176/ (accessed 05.02.2018). The Resolution was adopted to develop the order of the Government of the Russian Federation of December 27, 2012 N 2539-p (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2012, N 53, Art. 8043);

Dianne, A., Olivier, A., Ursa, R. (1993). Market Academy: Marketing. Moscow; Economics.

Fatkhutdinov, R. A. (2001). Competitiveness of Russia. Society and Economy 10-11:104.

Fatkhutdinov, R. A. (2000). Competitiveness Management. Standards and Quality 10.

Gerasimov, A. N., Gromov, E. I., Dyachenko, E. G. (2013). Strategic management of socio-economic development of the North Caucasus Federal District. Stavropol; AGRUS.

Geroski, P. A. (1995). Innovation and competitive. LBS Economic department working papers 159:54.

Golkov, A. S., Khrapov, V. E. (2012). Improving the competitiveness of domestic oil and gas engineering: a monograph. Murmansk; MAEU.

Gurkov, I., Avraamova, E., Tubalov, V. (2015). Competitiveness and innovativeness of Russian industrial enterprises: interconnections and influence of state economic policy (according to the results of a mass survey of industrial managers). Voprosy Ekonomiki 2:40.

1. Hayek, F. A. (1999). Cognition, competition and freedom. Saint Petersburg; Pneuma.

Khrapov, V. E., Turchaninova, T. V. (2015). Mechanisms of spatial interaction of enterprises with single and small-scale production in the coastal region. Monograph, Apatity; KSC RAS.

Karsuntseva, O. V. (2018). State machine-building complex in Russia. Available at: http://be5.biz/ekonomika1/r2011/2226.htm (accessed 03/05/18).

Kirsanov, M. Yu. (2015). The concept and essence of the national innovation system of the Russian Federation. Modern problems of science and education 1-1(S):623.

Magomedov, Sh. Sh., Yakubova, E. V. (2002). Methodology for assessing the competitiveness of goods using an electronic processor EXCEL FOR WINDOWS. Stavropol: Stavropolservis School.

Melkovskaya, K. R. (2018). Problems of the functioning of Russian machine-building enterprises. Available at: http://www.uecs.ru/uecs-36-122011/item/928-2011-12-27-11-47-15 (accessed 03/20/2018).

Mishin, Yu. V. (1999). The components of competitiveness: Recommendations for developing a strategy for the development of production structures. Risk 1:41–45.

Mishin, Yu. V., Sukharev, V. B., Kosterev, N. B. (2016). Methodological issues of forming an integrated assessment of the competitiveness of enterprises and organizations of high-tech industries (for example, aircraft manufacturing). Microeconomics 5:13-19.

Sergeev, A. A. (2014). Mechanical engineering competitiveness: reality 6, opportunities and prospects. Economic sciences 117:67-70.

Schumpeter, J. (1982). Theory of Economic Development. Moscow: Progress.

Shushkin, M. A., Zabaeva, M. N. (2006). Assessment of competitiveness of enterprises with divisional management structure. Management in Russia and abroad 1:58-63.

Strategy for the socio-economic development of the Murmansk region until 2025 (2018). Available at: http://www.csr-nw.ru/files/csr/file_category_169.pdf (accessed 18 March 2018)

Polovinkin, V. N., Fomichev, A. B. (2018). The current state and problems of development of domestic engineering. Available at: http://www.proatom.ru/ modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=4639 (accessed 02/27/18).

Porter, M. (2016). International Competition. Moscow; Alpina Publisher.

Peters, T., Watman, R. V. (1996). In search of effective management. Moscow; Progress.

Tatarskikh, B. Ya., Dubrovina, N. A. (2018). Economic issues of development of domestic engineering. Available at: http://www.bmpravo.ru/show_stat.php?stat=799 (appeal date 01/24/18).

Turchaninova, T. V., Khrapov, V. E. (2017). Search for an effective mechanism for the spatial innovation development of engineering enterprises of the Arctic seaside region. Apatityl; KSC RAS.

Vasiliev, A. M. (2016). The North and the Arctic in the new paradigm of world development: current problems, trends and prospects. Monograph, Publishing House of the Institute of Economic Problems named after GP. Luzin KSC RAS; Apatity.

Vyazagov, F. R., Kilchukov, Z. Kh. (2014). Conditions for sustainable and balanced development of industrial complex industries in modern conditions. Economy and Entrepreneurship 1(11):478-482.

Zakharov, A. N., Zokin, A. A. (2018). Enterprise competitiveness: essence, methods, assessments and mechanisms for increasing. Available at: http://www.logistics.ru/scm/9/2/i20_64.htm (accessed 03/20/2018).
Published
2019-04-29
How to Cite
Turchaninova, T., Khrapov, V., Vasiliev, A., & Kuranov, Y. (2019). Competitiveness assessment of ship repair enterprises in the coastal region. Amazonia Investiga, 8(19), 83-94. Retrieved from https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/202
Section
Articles
Bookmark and Share