Information-communication policy of the state in crisis conditions. Current state, problems, prospects
Abstract
Effective democracy requires effective mechanisms for society to influence public authorities. Interaction between government and citizens, active public participation in decision-making is the key to sustainable development, prosperity, and stability of state institutions, social programs, and economic growth. Political leadership and effective communication of the action plan to the public promote public order and security. In this paper, we explore the current state of information policy in a crisis. We used general scientific and special methods such as historical and philosophical, systemic, comparative. In the first part, we consider philosophical approaches to the concept of communication and the role of the state in shaping information policy. The second and third parts are devoted to specific examples of such policies within two countries: Ukraine and Azerbaijan. In conclusion, we argue that there are currently complex challenges for the information policy of both countries. This is especially true of health problems caused by the coronavirus pandemic and armed conflict. Differences in the prospects of regulating the information field of the two countries are caused by economic factors and political conditions. The ways of information society development on the example of each of the countries are considered.
Downloads
References
Aquinas, T. (2017). Summa Theologica [Summa Theologiae]. Second and Revised Edition, 1920. https://www.newadvent.org/summa/
Aristotle. (2021). Metaphysics. Politics. Poetics. Rhetoric. Moscow: Azbuka [Alphabet] [In Russian]
Bychenko, A. (2022). A poll was added to the Diya. Sociologists say they will not benefit. What's wrong with "digital democracy". Razumkov Center. https://razumkov.org.ua/komentari/u-diiu-dodaly-opytuvannia-sotsiology-kazhut-shcho-vony-ne-prynesut-korysti-shcho-ne-tak-z-tsyfrovym-narodovladdiam
Bikus, Z. (March 21, 2019). World-Low 9% of Ukrainians Confident in Government. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/247976/world-low-ukrainians-confident-government.aspx
Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2002). Democracy, Institutions and Attitudes about Citizen Influence on Government. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 371-390.
Canfield, J.V. (1993). The living language: Wittgenstein and the empirical study of communication. Language Sciences, 15(3), 165-193.
Chomsky, N., & Foucault, M. (2015). The Chomsky-Foucault debate: on human nature. New York: The New Press.
Gahramanova, A. (2009). Internal and external factors in the democratization of Azerbaijan. Democratization, 16(4), 777-803. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340903083919
Gehlen, A. (1952). The image of man in the light of modern anthropology. [Das Bild des Menschen im lichte der modernen Anthropologie]. Mercury [Merkur], 6(6), 533-545. https://volltext.merkur-zeitschrift.de/article/99.120210/mr-6-6-533
Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x
Həsənli, E. (2017, December). Information security in Azerbaijan in the context of national interests [Azərbaycanda informasiya təhlükəsizliyi milli maraqlar kontekstində]. Actual problems of information security [İnformasiya təhlükəsizliyinin aktual problemləri”], III, 42-45. https://ict.az/uploads/konfrans/info_sec/RS08_INFORMATION-SECURITY-IN_AZERBAIJAN-IN-THE-CONTEXT-OF-NATIONAL-INTERESTS.pdf
КIIS. (2021). Trust in social institutions and parties: December 2020. http://kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1005&page=3
КIIS. (2022). Dynamics of trust in social institutions during 2020-2021: the results of a telephone survey. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1093&page=1
Komzyuk, A.T., & Panchuk, O. (2003). Public control as a means of ensuring the rule of law in the field of public administration. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 23, 36-41. http://dspace.univd.edu.ua/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/8361/Hromadskyi%
20kontrol%20yak%20zasib%20zabezpechennia%20zakonnosti%20u%20sferi%20derzhavnoho%
20upravlinnia_Komziuk_Panchuk_2003.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Kraut, R. (2014). How to Read Plato. London: Granta Books https://www.amazon.com/How-Read-Plato-Richard-Kraut-ebook/dp/B00KC9SCQI
Krynychko, L.R., & Motaylo, O.V. (2021). Features of establishing information and communication links in the public administration of the health care system. Scientific Perspectives, 2(8), 343-365. https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2021-2(8)-343-365
Kushnir, OV (2015). The concept and essence of strategic communication in modern Ukrainian statehood. Law and Society, 6, 27-31. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pis_2015_6_7
Law No. 1995, Constitution. Collection of legislation of the Republic of Azerbaijan of November 12, 1995. https://mincom.gov.az/ru/view/pages/13/
Lu, D. (2019). Peirce’s philosophy of communication and language communication. Semiotica, 230, 407-423. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0164
Malinina, E.R. (2021). The importance of the role of communication in the political process. In Ukrainian state formation: historical aspect. Conference Abstracts, Kharkiv, May 11, 2018. Kharkiv: KhNPU, 2018 (pp. 180-182).
McCombs, M.E., Shaw, D.L., & Weaver, D.H. (2013). Communication and Democracy: Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-setting Theory. London: Routledge. ISBN 9780805825558. https://www.routledge.com/Communication-and-Democracy-Exploring-the-intellectual-Frontiers-in-Agenda-setting/McCombs-Shaw-Weaver/p/book/9780805825558
Morska, L. (2019). Linguo-stylistic tools of psychological influence on the electorate in political discourse (based on American Political Speeches). Annals of the University of Craiova. Philological Sciences Series. LANGUAGE [Analele Universităţii din Craiova. Seria Ştiinţe Filologice. Lingvistică], 1-2, 340-355. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=825357
Nekrecha, K. (2020). Vitaly Portnikov: "After the crisis, we may not see either Putin or Zelensky." Crimea. Realities. https://ua.krymr.com/a/portnykov-pislia-kryzy-my-mozhemo-ne-pobachyty-ni-putina-ni-zelenskoho/30574165.html
Nerubasskaya, AO, Sarnavskaya, OV, & Palshkov, KE (2021). Parametric analysis of the "communication" system. Current issues of philosophy and sociology, 28, 14-19. https://doi.org/10.32837/apfs.v0i28.941
Niyazov, X.Q. (2013). Information policy and mass media of the Azerbaijani state. Problems of the information society [Azərbaycan dövlətinin informasiya siyasəti və kütləvi informasiya vasitələri. İnformasiya cəmiyyəti problemləri], 1(7), 75-82. https://jpis.az/uploads/article/az/STATE_INFORMATION_POLICY_OF_AZERBAIJAN_AND_THE_MASS_MEDIA.pdf
Niyazov, X.Q. (2016). State information policy and mass media (on the example of Azerbaijan). Gileya: scientific bulletin, 109, 391-395. https://jpis.az/ru/journals/195
Niyazov, X.Q. (2017). Features of information activity in Azerbaijan: theoretical aspects and modern practice. Science Journal Politicus, 5, 30-34. http://dspace.pdpu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/7900/1/niyazov.pdf
Nyzhnyk, Н.Р. (2007). Problems of the present public administration in Ukraine. University Scientific Notes, 3, 14-19.
Obushna, N.I. (2015). Public administration as a new model of public administration in Ukraine: theoretical aspect. Efficiency of Public Administration, 44(1), 53-63. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/efdu_2015_44%281%29__8
Panchenko, O.A. (2020). The failure of the state information policy of Ukraine. Scientific notes of TNU. VI Vernadsky, 2, 144-148. https://www.rdc.org.ua/download/stati/failure-of-the-permitted-information-policy-of-ukraine.pdf
Pearce, K. (2014). Two can play at that game: social media opportunities in Azerbaijan for government and opposition. Democratization [Demokratizatsiya], 22(1), 39-66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286642729_Two_can_play_at_that_game_
Social_media_opportunities_in_Azerbaijan_for_government_and_opposition
Pearce, K.E., & Kendzior, S. (2012). Networked Authoritarianism and Social Media in Azerbaijan. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 283-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01633.x
Pearce, K.E., Freelon, D., & Kendzior, S. (2014). The effect of the Internet on civic engagement under authoritarianism: The case of Azerbaijan. First Monday, 6(19), 12-19. In https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/5000/4092
Plato. (2021). State. Lviv: A priori. http://www.apriori.lviv.ua/shop/aktsii/platon-derzhava/
Rahimov, E. (2008). Features of political modernization in Azerbaijan. Political Management, 5, 53-59. http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/59860/06-Ragimov.pdf?sequence=1
Razumkov Center. (2021). Trust in the institutions of society and politicians, electoral orientations of the citizens of Ukraine (July-August 2021). https://razumkov.org.ua/napriamky/sotsiologichni-doslidzhennia/dovira-do-instytutiv-suspilstva-ta-politykiv-elektoralni-oriientatsii-gromadian-ukrainy
Scheler, M. (2010). On the Eternal in Man. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315125688
Scheler, M. (2012). Problems of a Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203100936
Shah, D.V. (2016). Conversation is the soul of Democracy: Expression Effects, Communication Mediation, and Digital Media. Communication and the Public, 1(1), 12-18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296632362_Conversation_is_the_soul_
of_democracy_Expression_effects_communication_mediation_and_digital_media
Sidorenko, A., & Geybullayeva, A. (2010). The internet in Azerbaijan. Caucasus Analytical Digest, 15(10), 4-7. https://www.laender-analysen.de/cad/pdf/CaucasusAnalyticalDigest15.pdf
Synowitz, R. (December 17, 2020). Analysis: Nagorno-Karabakh War Transforms the Legacy of Azerbaijani President Aliyev. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. https://www.rferl.org/a/nagorno-karabakh-legacy-azerbaijani-president-aliyev/31006302.html
Tairov, A.I. (2010). Information support for the functioning of public authorities (doctoral thesis). Institute of State and Law. V.M. Koretsky NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv. [In Ukranian]
Tokarska, А.S. (2008). Legal communication in the context of postclassical legal understanding (doctoral thesis). National Institute of Internal Affairs. Kyiv. [In Ukranian]
USAID-Internews. (August, 2020). Media Consumption Survey. https://internews.in.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020-Media-Consumption-Survey-FULL-FIN-Ukr-1.pdf
van Dijk, T.A. (2008). Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.worldcat.org/title/discourse-and-power/oclc/244660683
Voronkova, V.G., & Oleksenko, R.I. (2020). Philosophy of public administration: synergetic research methodology. Humanities studies: collection of scientific papers, 5(82), 172-184. http://humstudies.com.ua/article/view/220904
Voronyansky, O.V. (2014). Political institutions: the mechanism of formation in a competitive environment. Modern Society, 1, 15-28. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/cuc_2014_1_4
Webb, J.L. (2007). Pragmatisms (plural) part 1: Classical pragmatism and some implications for empirical inquiry. Journal of Economic Issues, 41(4), 1063-1086. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2007.11507087
Wittgenstein, L. (2017). Selected Works. Moscow: Litres.
Xu, R. (2020, September). Analysis of the Concept of Self Between Brahmanism and Buddhism. In 5th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities-Philosophy of Being Human as the Core of Interdisciplinary Research (ICCESSH 2020) (pp. 103-106). Amsterdam: Atlantis Press.