Anti-innovation barriers in the professional activity of university lecturers in Ukraine and ways to overcome them: diagnostic aspect
Keywords:
anti-innovation barriers, higher educational establishments, pedagogical experiment, students, teachers, university lecturers.
Abstract
The article presents the analysis of anti-innovation barriers in the professional activity of lecturers in Ukraine and outlines the ways to overcome this phenomenon. For this reason the discussions of domestic and foreign scientists on the given problem are introduced; the scientific bases of innovative activity of pedagogues are defined, its essential characteristics are outlined; the reasons for the lecturers’ and teachers’ of general secondary education resistance to pedagogical innovation are identified. The authors represent an experimental scientific study of the problem in the practical activities of educational institutions in Ukraine. The subjects of the experiment were lecturers, students and school teachers in different regions of Ukraine. The pedagogical experiment conducted at the diagnostic level allowed to identify the main problems of educational activities in the field of pedagogical innovation and to propose an original method aimed at overcoming the reasons that hinder the introduction of innovative principles into the educational process of higher educational institutions.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Aleksyuk, A. (1998). Pedagogy of higher education in Ukraine. History. Theory: a textbook for students, graduate students and young teachers of higher education. Kyiv: Lybid, 1998. https://www.twirpx.com/file/237257/.
Anosova, A. (2011). Communicative culture of high school students and features of its manifestation on the Internet. Public Education, 2 (14). https://www.narodnaosvita.kiev.ua/Narodna_osvita/vupysku/17/statti/anosova.htm.
Bei, I. (2018). Parity dialogue as a factor of subject-to-subject cooperation between lecturer and student of foreign languages faculty. Educational space of Ukraine, 14, 135-141.
Budnyk, O., Fomin, K., Novoselska, N. & Voitovych, A. (2020). Preparing Teachers to Organize Dialogic Learning of Students: Communicative Aspect. Revista Inclusiones, 7 (4), 117-129.
Dychkivska, I. (2004). Innovative pedagogical technologies: textbook. Kyiv: akadamveedeva.
Dysa, O. (2020). Psychological factors of perception of innovations by employees of organizations. Psychology: reality and prospects, 15, Collection of scientific works of RDGU.S.50-58. https://doi.org/10.35619/praprv.v1i15.184
Dupliychuk, O. (2013). Model of professional and pedagogical training of a future teacher of philology in the light of a new educational paradigm. Scientific Notes, 38, 251-255. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nznuoaf_2013_38_78
Freud, S. (1955). Defense Mechanism. Encyclopedia Britannica. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/defense-mechanism.
Grewal, R., Mehta, R., & Kardes, F.R. (2000). The role of the social-identity function of attitudes in consumer innovation and opinion leadership. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, 233-252.
Hirnyak, A., & Vasylkiv, O. (2019). Psychological Barriers of Teacher and Students Interaction and Ways of their Effective Overcoming. Psychological Prospects Journal, (33), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2019-33-79-90.
Kelly, G.A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton / London: Routledge https://www.worldcat.org/title/psychology-of-personal-constructs/oclc/217761.
Kondo, T. (2020). Transforming critical and participative teacher research into communicative action: a possible direction for teacher professional learning, Educational Action Research, 28(2), 159-174, DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2019.1667256.
Kravchuk, A. (2018). Current state and prospects of development of innovative activity of industrial enterprises of Ukraine. Business Inform., 7, 57-65. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/binf_2018_7_10.
Maksymenko, N., Bei, I., Khimchuk, L., & Vovchok, Y. (2020). Formation of Communicative Culture of Students by Means of Project Teaching in Higher Educational Establishments. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, Cilt 9(3), 267-276. http://kutaksam.karabuk.edu.tr/index.php/ilk/issue/view/46. https://doi.org/ 10.7596 / taksad.v9i3.2719.
Marynovska, O. (2009). Formation of teachers' readiness for project-implementation activity: theory and practice: monograph. Poltava: Environment-K, https://www.twirpx.com/file/2839664/.
Maslow, A. (1997). Toward a Psychology of Being. Litton Education Publishing, 1 http://psylib.org.ua/books/masla02/index.htm
Mikhailova, O. (2012). The structure of innovation potential of personality. Bulletin of Moscow State University. Series Psychology, 6 (1), 26-31. https://nsu.ru/xmlui/handle/nsu/1961.
Nikolaesku, I., Budnyk, O., Bondar, V., Tepla, O., & Berezovska, L. (2021). Pedagogical Management in Inclusive Process of the Educational Institution. Amazonia Investiga, 10 (39), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.39.03.7
Paramita, P., Anderson, A., & Sharma, U. (2020). Effective Teacher Professional Learning on Classroom Behavior Management: A Review of Literature. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45 (1), 61-81 10.14221 / ajte.2020v45n1.5. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n1.5.
Podymova, L. (2012). Psychological and pedagogical innovation: personal aspect: Monograph. M.: Prometheus ISBN 978-5-4263-0108-5.
Robinson, L.Jr., Marshall, G.W., & Stamps, M.B. (2005). Sales force use of technology: antecedents to technology acceptance. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1623-1631.
Rogers, C.R. (1951). The theory of therapy and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. Boston, 1951. P. 517.
Shakurov, R. (2001). Barrier as a category and its role in activity. Questions of psychology, 1. https://hr-portal.ru/article/barer-kak-kategoriya-i-ego-rol-v-deyatelnosti.
Starovoit, O. (2014). The problem of overcoming socio-psychological barriers to individual innovation. Bulletin of the Institute of Child Development. Ser.: Philosophy, pedagogy, psychology, 34, 55-63. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vird_2014_34_11.
Tkachenko, V. (2018). Innovative activity in education bodies. Investments: Practice and Experience, 10, 44-46. http://www.investplan.com.ua/?op=1&z=6092&i=7.
Tolochko, S. (2020). Teacher-innovator as an organizer of student activities in terms of student-centered learning, scientific notes. Series: Pedagogical Sciences, 189, 79-84. https://doi.org/10.36550/2415-7988-2020-1-189-79-84.
Tsependa, I., & Budnyk, O. (2021). Editorial. Mission and strategy of a modern university development in the conditions of digitalization. Amazonia Investiga, 10 (41), 6-9. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.41.05.0
Vaganova, O., Rudenko, I., Markova, S., Smirnova, Z., & Kutepov, M. (2019). The use of educational video materials in educational process of a higher educational institution. Amazonia Investiga, 8(22), 216-222. Retrieved from https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/308
Volkova, N. (2013). Characteristics of requirements for the training of foreign language teachers in terms of higher education Problems of modern pedagogical education. Pedagogy and Psychology, 39 (3), 85-92. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/pspo_2013_39%283%29__16.
White, P., Raphael, J., Hannigan, S., & Cripps Clark, J. (2020). Entangling Our Thinking and Practice: A Model for Collaboration in Teacher Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45 (8). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n8.6
Anosova, A. (2011). Communicative culture of high school students and features of its manifestation on the Internet. Public Education, 2 (14). https://www.narodnaosvita.kiev.ua/Narodna_osvita/vupysku/17/statti/anosova.htm.
Bei, I. (2018). Parity dialogue as a factor of subject-to-subject cooperation between lecturer and student of foreign languages faculty. Educational space of Ukraine, 14, 135-141.
Budnyk, O., Fomin, K., Novoselska, N. & Voitovych, A. (2020). Preparing Teachers to Organize Dialogic Learning of Students: Communicative Aspect. Revista Inclusiones, 7 (4), 117-129.
Dychkivska, I. (2004). Innovative pedagogical technologies: textbook. Kyiv: akadamveedeva.
Dysa, O. (2020). Psychological factors of perception of innovations by employees of organizations. Psychology: reality and prospects, 15, Collection of scientific works of RDGU.S.50-58. https://doi.org/10.35619/praprv.v1i15.184
Dupliychuk, O. (2013). Model of professional and pedagogical training of a future teacher of philology in the light of a new educational paradigm. Scientific Notes, 38, 251-255. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nznuoaf_2013_38_78
Freud, S. (1955). Defense Mechanism. Encyclopedia Britannica. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/defense-mechanism.
Grewal, R., Mehta, R., & Kardes, F.R. (2000). The role of the social-identity function of attitudes in consumer innovation and opinion leadership. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, 233-252.
Hirnyak, A., & Vasylkiv, O. (2019). Psychological Barriers of Teacher and Students Interaction and Ways of their Effective Overcoming. Psychological Prospects Journal, (33), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2019-33-79-90.
Kelly, G.A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton / London: Routledge https://www.worldcat.org/title/psychology-of-personal-constructs/oclc/217761.
Kondo, T. (2020). Transforming critical and participative teacher research into communicative action: a possible direction for teacher professional learning, Educational Action Research, 28(2), 159-174, DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2019.1667256.
Kravchuk, A. (2018). Current state and prospects of development of innovative activity of industrial enterprises of Ukraine. Business Inform., 7, 57-65. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/binf_2018_7_10.
Maksymenko, N., Bei, I., Khimchuk, L., & Vovchok, Y. (2020). Formation of Communicative Culture of Students by Means of Project Teaching in Higher Educational Establishments. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, Cilt 9(3), 267-276. http://kutaksam.karabuk.edu.tr/index.php/ilk/issue/view/46. https://doi.org/ 10.7596 / taksad.v9i3.2719.
Marynovska, O. (2009). Formation of teachers' readiness for project-implementation activity: theory and practice: monograph. Poltava: Environment-K, https://www.twirpx.com/file/2839664/.
Maslow, A. (1997). Toward a Psychology of Being. Litton Education Publishing, 1 http://psylib.org.ua/books/masla02/index.htm
Mikhailova, O. (2012). The structure of innovation potential of personality. Bulletin of Moscow State University. Series Psychology, 6 (1), 26-31. https://nsu.ru/xmlui/handle/nsu/1961.
Nikolaesku, I., Budnyk, O., Bondar, V., Tepla, O., & Berezovska, L. (2021). Pedagogical Management in Inclusive Process of the Educational Institution. Amazonia Investiga, 10 (39), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.39.03.7
Paramita, P., Anderson, A., & Sharma, U. (2020). Effective Teacher Professional Learning on Classroom Behavior Management: A Review of Literature. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45 (1), 61-81 10.14221 / ajte.2020v45n1.5. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n1.5.
Podymova, L. (2012). Psychological and pedagogical innovation: personal aspect: Monograph. M.: Prometheus ISBN 978-5-4263-0108-5.
Robinson, L.Jr., Marshall, G.W., & Stamps, M.B. (2005). Sales force use of technology: antecedents to technology acceptance. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1623-1631.
Rogers, C.R. (1951). The theory of therapy and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. Boston, 1951. P. 517.
Shakurov, R. (2001). Barrier as a category and its role in activity. Questions of psychology, 1. https://hr-portal.ru/article/barer-kak-kategoriya-i-ego-rol-v-deyatelnosti.
Starovoit, O. (2014). The problem of overcoming socio-psychological barriers to individual innovation. Bulletin of the Institute of Child Development. Ser.: Philosophy, pedagogy, psychology, 34, 55-63. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vird_2014_34_11.
Tkachenko, V. (2018). Innovative activity in education bodies. Investments: Practice and Experience, 10, 44-46. http://www.investplan.com.ua/?op=1&z=6092&i=7.
Tolochko, S. (2020). Teacher-innovator as an organizer of student activities in terms of student-centered learning, scientific notes. Series: Pedagogical Sciences, 189, 79-84. https://doi.org/10.36550/2415-7988-2020-1-189-79-84.
Tsependa, I., & Budnyk, O. (2021). Editorial. Mission and strategy of a modern university development in the conditions of digitalization. Amazonia Investiga, 10 (41), 6-9. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.41.05.0
Vaganova, O., Rudenko, I., Markova, S., Smirnova, Z., & Kutepov, M. (2019). The use of educational video materials in educational process of a higher educational institution. Amazonia Investiga, 8(22), 216-222. Retrieved from https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/308
Volkova, N. (2013). Characteristics of requirements for the training of foreign language teachers in terms of higher education Problems of modern pedagogical education. Pedagogy and Psychology, 39 (3), 85-92. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/pspo_2013_39%283%29__16.
White, P., Raphael, J., Hannigan, S., & Cripps Clark, J. (2020). Entangling Our Thinking and Practice: A Model for Collaboration in Teacher Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45 (8). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n8.6
Published
2021-08-31
How to Cite
Maksymenko, N., Kilichenko, O., Khimchuk, L., Bei, I., & Vovchok, Y. (2021). Anti-innovation barriers in the professional activity of university lecturers in Ukraine and ways to overcome them: diagnostic aspect. Amazonia Investiga, 10(43), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.43.07.22
Issue
Section
Articles
.gif)
