Education, work and creation: ways for developing technological education of schoolchildren in Russia
Keywords:
creation, invention, metaphysics of technology, technological education, school.
Abstract
The authors touch upon the problem of the development of additional technological education in Russian schools by comparing it with the situation in Western countries. Aim: strong requirements for inventions of schoolchildren should be established, a clear sequence of their teaching in invention and creation should be developed. Methods: methodology for teaching schoolchildren to invent and create something that has not existed before in different age groups is presented; a patent for a utility model developed jointly with schoolchildren participating in the system of additional technological education in Lipetsk seem to be important results of this study. Results: the authors considered ways to improve the effectiveness of teaching schoolchildren to invent in the field of additional technological education, taking into account current problems and trends. The systematic training of schoolchildren from elementary grade to middle and senior grades normally gives a positive result during the formation of divergent thinking, which translates into the child's ability to generate a variety of ideas for improving technical objects and creation as such. Attracting the capabilities of enterprises to organize an authentic educational process is relevant, too, as long as the project activities are designed to form the skills of independent work, creative and research activities.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Ardura, D., & Pérez-Bitrián, A. (2019). Motivational pathways towards academic achievement in physics & chemistry: A comparison between students who opt out and those who persist. Chemistry Education Research & Practice, 20, 618–632. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00073A
Ankiewicz, P.J. (2019). Andrew Feenberg: Implications of critical theory for technology education. In J.R. Dakers, J. Hallstrem & M.J. De Vries (Eds.). Reflections on Technology for Educational Practitioners: Philosophers of Technology Inspiring Technology Education. Boston, MA: Brill.
Botleng, V.J., Brunel, S., & Girard, P. (2019). Learning through design and make: Producing originally thought-out products versus producing pre-designed products downloaded from data files. In S. Pulé & M.J. De Vries (Eds.). Proceedings PATT 37, Developing a Knowledge Economy through Technology and Engineering Education, Msida, Malta,. Msida: University of Malta. https://www.iteea.org/File.aspx?id=157700&v=e94e5d51
Bushueva, V.V., & Bushuev, N.N. (2018). Comparative analysis of domestic and foreign activation methods of technical creativity. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research (Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Economy, Management And Entrepreneurship – ICOEME 2018), 70, 31–35. https://doi.org/10.2991/icoeme-18.2018.6
Chai C.S., Jong, MS-Y., Yin, H-B., Chen, M., & Zhou, W. (2019). Validating and modelling teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge for integrative science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Educational Technology & Society, 22(3), 61–73.
Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2010). Recognizing and fostering creativity in technological design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(3), 345–358.
Dakers, J.R. (Ed.) (2006). Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Danilaev, D.P., & Malivanov, N.N. (2020). Technological education and engineering pedagogy. The Education and Science Journal, 22(3), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-3-55-82
Dessauer, F. (1959). What Is The Human? The Four Questions of Immanuel Kant. Frankfurt am Main: Knecht. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Was-ist-der-Mensch-%3A-die-vier-Fragen-des-Immanuel-Dessauer/e2151a5e1cba3a87eea04b861d97f7e4310deab2
Dessauer, F. (1983). Philosophy in its proper sphere. In C. Mitcham and R. Mackey (Eds.). Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Technology (pp. 317–334). New York: Free Press. https://books.google.ru/books?id=R5X_xpis2QsC&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru&source=gbs_book_other_versions#v=onepage&q&f=false
Dessauer, F. (1956). Slreit in die Technik [Controversy over Technology]. Frankfurt am Main: Knecht. https://katalog.ub.tu-braunschweig.de/vufind/Search2Record/018593461
Duggan, R. (1996). Promoting innovation in industry, government and higher education. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)00042-8
Gordon, E.W., Aber, L., & Berliner, D. (2012). Changing Paradigms for Education: From Filling Buckets to Lighting Fires. To Cultivation of Intellective Competence. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/gordon_gordon_berliner_aber_changing_
paradigms_education.pdf
Hallström, J. (2020). Embodying the past, designing the future: Technological determinism reconsidered in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09600-2
Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays. Trans. by W. Lovitt. New York & London: Garland Publ. https://monoskop.org/images/4/44/Heidegger_Martin_The_Question_Concerning_
Technology_and_Other_Essays.pdf
Hrybiuk, O. (2019). Improvement of the educational process by the creation of centers for intellectual development and scientific and technical creativity. In A. Hamrol, A. Kujawińska & M. Barraza (Eds.). Advances in Manufacturing II. MANUFACTURING 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18789-7_31
Hursen, C. (2017). The effect of a school – based outdoor education program on visual arts teachers’ success and self-efficacy beliefs. South African Journal of Education, 37(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n3a1395
Ihde, D. (2006). The designer fallacy and technological imagination. In J.R. Dakers (Ed.). Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983053_9
Kachnev, V.I. (Ed.) (1990). Creative Technical and Design Activities in the Labor Training of Schoolchildren: Method. Recommendation. Tashkent: UzNIIPN. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01001564295
Kaner, V.F. (Ed.) (2016). Problems of Technical Creativity. Ufa: Aeterna. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01008733077
Kolotilov, B.B. (1989). Extracurricular Work on Technology and Labor. Kirov: Volgo-Vyat Publishing. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01001512185
Kondratiev, A., Rudneva, O., & Tolstenko, A. (2021). The strange case of Fyodor Dostoevsky and Robert Stevenson in the Victorian Age: A protest against the depersonalization. Amazonia Investiga, 10(41), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.41.05.7
McLain, M., Irving-Bell, D., Wooff, D., Morrison-Love, D. (2019). How technology makes us human: Cultural historical roots for design and technology education. The Curriculum Journal, 30(4), 464–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1649163
Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through Technology. The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Nesterenko, A.A., Terekhova, G.V. (2017). Creation of the environment for the development of inventive abilities in subjects of education. Espacios, 38(40), 28. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n40/a17v38n40p28.pdf
Nigmatov, Z.G., & Nugumanova, I.N. (2015). Methods for developing technological thinking skills in the pupils of profession-oriented schools. Asian Social Science, 11(8), 207–214. http://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n8p207
Nikulin, S.K. (1994). Development of technical creativity of vocational education students in the period of transition to the market: The managerial aspect (PhD thesis). Institute of General Education, Moscow, https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01000102672
Portnova, T.V. (2016). Structural features of theatrical excursions (methodology based on theatre museum expositions. IEJME: Mathematics Education, 11(8), 2963–2973. https://www.iejme.com/article/structural-features-of-theatrical-excursions-methodology-based-on-theatre-museum-expositions
Sasova, I.A. (2011). Technological education or labor training? Russian Education and Society, 53(6), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.2753/RES1060-9393530604
Skrbina, D. (2014). German metaphysical insights Dessauer, Juenger, Heidegger. In D. Skrbina, (2014). Metaphysics of Technology (Ser.: Routledge Studies in Social and Political Thought, vol. 94) (pp. 70–93). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315879581
Skytt-Larsen, C.B. (2018). The influence of the early formation of human and social capital on inventiveness: Perspectives from a Swedish case study. Geojournal, 83(6), 1181–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-017-9826-3
Smirnova, E. (2018). Control capability of environmental safety in the context of green construction paradigm. Espacios, 39(22), 40. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n22/a18v39n22p40.pdf
Solé Blanch, J. (2020). El cambio educativo ante la innovación tecnológica, la pedagogía de las competencias y el discurso de la educación emocional [The educational change in front of the technological innovation, the pedagogy of competences and the discourse of the emotional education. A critical approach]. Una Mirada Crítica Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, 32(1), 101–121. http://doi.org/10.14201/teri.20945
Stage, C., Eriksson, B., & Reestorff, C.М. (2019). Understanding cultural participation through participation – inventiveness, multivalence and epistemic modernization. Cultural Trends, 29(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2019.1692183
Steenekamp, K., Van Der Merwe, M., & Mehmedova, A.S. (2018). Enabling the development of student teacher professional identity through vicarious learning during an educational excursion. South African Journal of Education, 38(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n1a1407
Sundqvist, P. (2020). Technological knowledge in early childhood education: Provision by staff of learning opportunities. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30, 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09500-0
Susanto, R., Rachmadtullah, R., & Rachbini, W. (2020). Technological and pedagogical models: Analysis of factors and measurement of learning outcomes in education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 1–14. http://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/311
Thayer-Bacon, B.J. (2019). Redefining work and education in the technological revolution. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 38, 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09649-0
Thompson, K. (2017). Changing Education Paradigms. Revise Sociology, https://revisesociology.com/2017/07/30/ken-robinson-changing-education-paradigms/
Tigrov, V., & Negrobova, L. (2018). Nature excursion as a means of developing schoolchildren’s creative thinking and solving inventive problems. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(11), 2561–2568. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329739057_Nature_excursion_as_a_
means_of_developing_schoolchildren's_creative_thinking_and_solving_inventive_problems
Tolstenko, A., Baltovskij, L., & Radikov, I. (2019). Chance of civic education in Russia. Sage Open, 9(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019859684
Ankiewicz, P.J. (2019). Andrew Feenberg: Implications of critical theory for technology education. In J.R. Dakers, J. Hallstrem & M.J. De Vries (Eds.). Reflections on Technology for Educational Practitioners: Philosophers of Technology Inspiring Technology Education. Boston, MA: Brill.
Botleng, V.J., Brunel, S., & Girard, P. (2019). Learning through design and make: Producing originally thought-out products versus producing pre-designed products downloaded from data files. In S. Pulé & M.J. De Vries (Eds.). Proceedings PATT 37, Developing a Knowledge Economy through Technology and Engineering Education, Msida, Malta,. Msida: University of Malta. https://www.iteea.org/File.aspx?id=157700&v=e94e5d51
Bushueva, V.V., & Bushuev, N.N. (2018). Comparative analysis of domestic and foreign activation methods of technical creativity. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research (Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Economy, Management And Entrepreneurship – ICOEME 2018), 70, 31–35. https://doi.org/10.2991/icoeme-18.2018.6
Chai C.S., Jong, MS-Y., Yin, H-B., Chen, M., & Zhou, W. (2019). Validating and modelling teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge for integrative science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Educational Technology & Society, 22(3), 61–73.
Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2010). Recognizing and fostering creativity in technological design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(3), 345–358.
Dakers, J.R. (Ed.) (2006). Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Danilaev, D.P., & Malivanov, N.N. (2020). Technological education and engineering pedagogy. The Education and Science Journal, 22(3), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-3-55-82
Dessauer, F. (1959). What Is The Human? The Four Questions of Immanuel Kant. Frankfurt am Main: Knecht. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Was-ist-der-Mensch-%3A-die-vier-Fragen-des-Immanuel-Dessauer/e2151a5e1cba3a87eea04b861d97f7e4310deab2
Dessauer, F. (1983). Philosophy in its proper sphere. In C. Mitcham and R. Mackey (Eds.). Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Technology (pp. 317–334). New York: Free Press. https://books.google.ru/books?id=R5X_xpis2QsC&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru&source=gbs_book_other_versions#v=onepage&q&f=false
Dessauer, F. (1956). Slreit in die Technik [Controversy over Technology]. Frankfurt am Main: Knecht. https://katalog.ub.tu-braunschweig.de/vufind/Search2Record/018593461
Duggan, R. (1996). Promoting innovation in industry, government and higher education. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)00042-8
Gordon, E.W., Aber, L., & Berliner, D. (2012). Changing Paradigms for Education: From Filling Buckets to Lighting Fires. To Cultivation of Intellective Competence. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/gordon_gordon_berliner_aber_changing_
paradigms_education.pdf
Hallström, J. (2020). Embodying the past, designing the future: Technological determinism reconsidered in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09600-2
Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays. Trans. by W. Lovitt. New York & London: Garland Publ. https://monoskop.org/images/4/44/Heidegger_Martin_The_Question_Concerning_
Technology_and_Other_Essays.pdf
Hrybiuk, O. (2019). Improvement of the educational process by the creation of centers for intellectual development and scientific and technical creativity. In A. Hamrol, A. Kujawińska & M. Barraza (Eds.). Advances in Manufacturing II. MANUFACTURING 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18789-7_31
Hursen, C. (2017). The effect of a school – based outdoor education program on visual arts teachers’ success and self-efficacy beliefs. South African Journal of Education, 37(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n3a1395
Ihde, D. (2006). The designer fallacy and technological imagination. In J.R. Dakers (Ed.). Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983053_9
Kachnev, V.I. (Ed.) (1990). Creative Technical and Design Activities in the Labor Training of Schoolchildren: Method. Recommendation. Tashkent: UzNIIPN. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01001564295
Kaner, V.F. (Ed.) (2016). Problems of Technical Creativity. Ufa: Aeterna. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01008733077
Kolotilov, B.B. (1989). Extracurricular Work on Technology and Labor. Kirov: Volgo-Vyat Publishing. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01001512185
Kondratiev, A., Rudneva, O., & Tolstenko, A. (2021). The strange case of Fyodor Dostoevsky and Robert Stevenson in the Victorian Age: A protest against the depersonalization. Amazonia Investiga, 10(41), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.41.05.7
McLain, M., Irving-Bell, D., Wooff, D., Morrison-Love, D. (2019). How technology makes us human: Cultural historical roots for design and technology education. The Curriculum Journal, 30(4), 464–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1649163
Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through Technology. The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Nesterenko, A.A., Terekhova, G.V. (2017). Creation of the environment for the development of inventive abilities in subjects of education. Espacios, 38(40), 28. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n40/a17v38n40p28.pdf
Nigmatov, Z.G., & Nugumanova, I.N. (2015). Methods for developing technological thinking skills in the pupils of profession-oriented schools. Asian Social Science, 11(8), 207–214. http://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n8p207
Nikulin, S.K. (1994). Development of technical creativity of vocational education students in the period of transition to the market: The managerial aspect (PhD thesis). Institute of General Education, Moscow, https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01000102672
Portnova, T.V. (2016). Structural features of theatrical excursions (methodology based on theatre museum expositions. IEJME: Mathematics Education, 11(8), 2963–2973. https://www.iejme.com/article/structural-features-of-theatrical-excursions-methodology-based-on-theatre-museum-expositions
Sasova, I.A. (2011). Technological education or labor training? Russian Education and Society, 53(6), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.2753/RES1060-9393530604
Skrbina, D. (2014). German metaphysical insights Dessauer, Juenger, Heidegger. In D. Skrbina, (2014). Metaphysics of Technology (Ser.: Routledge Studies in Social and Political Thought, vol. 94) (pp. 70–93). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315879581
Skytt-Larsen, C.B. (2018). The influence of the early formation of human and social capital on inventiveness: Perspectives from a Swedish case study. Geojournal, 83(6), 1181–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-017-9826-3
Smirnova, E. (2018). Control capability of environmental safety in the context of green construction paradigm. Espacios, 39(22), 40. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n22/a18v39n22p40.pdf
Solé Blanch, J. (2020). El cambio educativo ante la innovación tecnológica, la pedagogía de las competencias y el discurso de la educación emocional [The educational change in front of the technological innovation, the pedagogy of competences and the discourse of the emotional education. A critical approach]. Una Mirada Crítica Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, 32(1), 101–121. http://doi.org/10.14201/teri.20945
Stage, C., Eriksson, B., & Reestorff, C.М. (2019). Understanding cultural participation through participation – inventiveness, multivalence and epistemic modernization. Cultural Trends, 29(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2019.1692183
Steenekamp, K., Van Der Merwe, M., & Mehmedova, A.S. (2018). Enabling the development of student teacher professional identity through vicarious learning during an educational excursion. South African Journal of Education, 38(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n1a1407
Sundqvist, P. (2020). Technological knowledge in early childhood education: Provision by staff of learning opportunities. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30, 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09500-0
Susanto, R., Rachmadtullah, R., & Rachbini, W. (2020). Technological and pedagogical models: Analysis of factors and measurement of learning outcomes in education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 1–14. http://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/311
Thayer-Bacon, B.J. (2019). Redefining work and education in the technological revolution. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 38, 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09649-0
Thompson, K. (2017). Changing Education Paradigms. Revise Sociology, https://revisesociology.com/2017/07/30/ken-robinson-changing-education-paradigms/
Tigrov, V., & Negrobova, L. (2018). Nature excursion as a means of developing schoolchildren’s creative thinking and solving inventive problems. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(11), 2561–2568. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329739057_Nature_excursion_as_a_
means_of_developing_schoolchildren's_creative_thinking_and_solving_inventive_problems
Tolstenko, A., Baltovskij, L., & Radikov, I. (2019). Chance of civic education in Russia. Sage Open, 9(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019859684
Published
2021-07-30
How to Cite
Tigrov, V., Tolstenko, A., Negrobova, L., Dobromyslova, O., & Piminov, E. (2021). Education, work and creation: ways for developing technological education of schoolchildren in Russia. Amazonia Investiga, 10(42), 206-216. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.42.06.19
Issue
Section
Articles
.gif)
