Methodological procedure of diagnosing behavioural stereotypes resilience of different language cultures representatives

Keywords: stereotype, resilience, behaviour stereotype resilience, methodological procedure, four language cultures representatives.

Abstract

This paper represents the methodological procedure of diagnosing behavioural stereotypes resilience of different language cultures representatives. The methodological procedure is aimed at compiling a typology of narrative codes of stereotypes resilience of four language cultures representatives and it involves the implementation of six successive stages that will help: 1) to compile a list of personal characteristics of respondents involved in the survey; 2) to compile stimulus lists, i.e. markers of expressive narratives (by keywords); 3) to enter the compiled stimuli lists into the Google Forms with corresponding guidelines for respondents; 4) to perform a free associative experiment with the British, French, Germans and Ukrainians of different social groups through electronic communication; 5) to do the computer processing of the obtained results with the involvement of the information-analytical service STIMULUS; 6) to differentiate the degree of stereotypes resilience of separate social groups of each studied linguoculture in situations of expressive narratives, and differentiate linguistic cultures according to three types of their resilience and their degrees of adaptation to stressful phenomena.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Yan Kapranov, Kyiv National Linguistics University, Ukraine.

Kyiv National Linguistics University, Ukraine.

Olesya Cherkhava, Kyiv National Linguistics University, Ukraine.

Kyiv National Linguistics University, Ukraine.

Viktoriia Gromova, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Ukraine.

National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Ukraine.

Olga Reshetnyk, Kyiv National Linguistics University, Ukraine.

Kyiv National Linguistics University, Ukraine.

References

Ananiyev, B. G. (2001). Man as a subject of knowledge. SPb: Piter.

APA (2015). Dictionary of psychology. 2nd ed. / Gary R. VandenBos, editor-in-chief. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association,

Apresyan, Yu. D. (1974). Lexical semantics: synonymous means of language. Moscow: Nauka.

Bartone, J. A. (2017). Welcome to the hardiness-resilience resource website. Retrieved April 20, 2021 from http://www.hardiness-resilience.com/hello-world/

Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 228-235.

Bayburin, A. K. (1993). Ritual in traditional culture. Structural and semantic analysis of East Slavic rituals. SPb: Nauka.

Canetti, D., Waismel-Manor, I., Cohen, N. & Rapaport, C. (2013). What Does National Resilience Mean in a Democracy? Evidence from the United States and Israel. Armed Forces Camp Society, 40. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X12466828.

Castro, F. G. & Murray, K. E. (2010). Cultural adaptation and resilience: Controversies, issues, and emerging model. In J. W. Reich, A. J. Zautra & J. S. Hall (Eds.), Handbook of adult resilience. New York: Guilford Press, ISBN 146250647X.

Cherkhava, O. О. (2015). Reconstruction of theolinguistic matrix of religious popular discourse (based on English, German and Ukrainian languages). Science and Education a New Dimension. Philology, 3(10), 47, 13-19.

Dronova, L. P. (2012). Search for optimization of semantic reconstruction. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philology Series, 282, 212-215.

Fominova, A. N. (2012). Personal Hardiness. Russia: MPSU.

Gumilev, L. (2008). Passionate energy and ethnos in a developed civilization. In Proceeding of Ukrainian Interdisciplinary Scientific and Practical Conference, 5-8.

Gurevich, P. S. (1990). Stereotype. Modern Western Sociology. Moscow: Politizdat.

Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113–127.

Kapranov, Y. (2018). Methodological Algorithm for Diachronic Interpretation of Nostratic *mar-a ‘tree’ (based on the data taken from A. R. Bomhard’s “A Comprehensive Introduction to Nostratic Comparative Linguistics: With Special Reference to Indo-European”). Advanced Education, 10, 198-205. DOI: 10.20535/2410-8286.143784

Leontyev, D. A., & Rasskazova, E. I. (2006). Hardiness and its diagnostics. M.: Smysl.

Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421-1436.

Lippman, W. (2011). Public Opinion. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.

Loginova, M. V. (2009). Resilience as an internal key resource of a personality. Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, (6), 19-27.

Lushyn, P. (n.d.). (2012). The paradox of “equivalence” and the self-organization of psychological assistance space. Retrieved July 12, 2020, from https://www.academia.edu/4108057/Lushyn_PPL_Congress_Paper.

Lushyn, P. V. (2007). On human psychology in transition period: How to survive when everything is falling apart?. Nauk. svit.

Maddi, S. R., Harvey, R., & Khoshaba, D. M. (2009). Nephthys Resurreccion. Hardiness training facilitates performance in collage. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 566-577.

Maddi, S. R. (2004). Hardiness: An Operationalization of Existential Courage. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 44, 279-298. DOI: 10.1177/0022167804266101.

Maddi, S. R. (2013). Hardiness Turning Stressful Circumstances into Resilient Growth. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Maklakov, A. G. (2001). Adaptation potential: its mobilization and forecasting in extreme conditions. Psychological journal, 22(1), 16-24.

Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist. 56(3). DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227. PMID 11315249.

Meshcheriakov, B. G., & Zinchenko, V. P. (2003). The Big Psychological Dictionary. St. Petersburg: “Praim-Evroznak”.

Moenkemeyer, G. & Hoegl, M. (2012). Innovator resilience potential: A process perspective of individual resilience as influenced by innovation project termination. Human Relations, 65(5).

Panter-Brick, C., Eggerman, M., Ager, A., Hadfied, K., & Dajani, R. (2020). Measuring the psychosocial, biological, and cognitive signatures of profound stress in humanitarian settings: Impacts, challenges, and strategies in the field. Conflict and Health, 1-7. DOI: 10.1186/s13031-020-00286-w

Richardson, G. E. (2002). The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3). DOI: 10.1002/jclp.10020.

Seery, M. D., Leo, R. J., Holman, E. A., & Silver, R. C. (2010). Lifetime exposure to adversity predicts functional impairment and healthcare utilization among individuals with chronic back pain. Pain, 150, 507–515.

Shutova, M. O. (2016). Ethnocultural stereotypical portraits of English and Ukrainians (cognitive-onomasiological reconstruction of phrase formulas) (Doctoral dissertation), Kyiv National Linguistic University. Kyiv.

Siebert, A. (2005). The Resiliency Advantage. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Somvanshi, P. R., Mellon, Sh., Flory, J. D., Abu-Amara D., Wolkowitz, O. M., Yehuda, R., Jett, M., Hood, L., Marmar, C., & Doyle, F. J. (2019). 3rd. Mechanistic inferences on metabolic dysfunction in posttraumatic stress disorder from an integrated model and multiomic analysis: role of glucocorticoid receptor sensitivity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 317(5), 879-898. DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00065.2019.

Tytarenko, T. M., & Larina, T. O. (n.d.). Hardiness: Social necessity and security. Retrieved July 12, 2020, from http://lib.iitta.gov.ua/9065/1/Zhiznestoykost_lichnosti.pdf.

Vasko, R. (2019). Reflection of the Ancient Rituals Semiotics in Cultural Etiquette Forms of Politeness. Logos, 100, 85–94. DOI: 10.24101/logos.2019.53

Vasko, R. (2019). Semiotic and Culturological Passportization of Numeric Phraseosymbols. Logos, 98, 94–103. DOI: 10.24101/logos.2019.10

Vasko, R., Korolyova, A., Kapranov, Y., & Tolcheyeva T. (2020). Human Language as a Natural Artifact of Planetary-Noospheric Mind: Coevolutionary-Macromutational Reinterpretation. Amazonia Investiga, 9(34), 17–23. DOI: 10.34069/AI/2020.34.10.2

Yermolenko, S. S. (2006). The sign structure of the language unit in the communicative-epistemic perspective. Kyiv: Nauka.
Published
2021-05-05
How to Cite
Kapranov, Y., Cherkhava, O., Gromova, V., & Reshetnyk, O. (2021). Methodological procedure of diagnosing behavioural stereotypes resilience of different language cultures representatives. Amazonia Investiga, 10(39), 186-193. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.39.03.18
Section
Articles
Bookmark and Share