Proof during the prejudicial inquiry of smugglingof narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs, or precursors under the legislation of Ukraine
Keywords:
narcotic drugs,prejudicial inquiry, psychotropic substances, proof, smuggling.
Abstract
The object of the study is social relations regarding the prejudicial inquiry of smuggling narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs or precursors. It has been found that there are scholars who choose different definitions for interpreting the nature of the proof, but are unanimous about the role of this process in proving a person’s guilt and choosing an adequate punishment.
The authors use a set of scientific methods of modern epistemology as well as comparative, special legal, logical and other methods.
We propose to analyze all the circumstances that are subject to proof during the prejudicial inquiry of smuggling of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs, or precursors. In this paper must identify the general grounds that must be proved in each crime and the specific circumstances that are important to prove only in the case of smuggling narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs, or precursors.
The conclusion is made about the importance of proper procedural support of criminal prosecution of persons who have committed a crime under Article 305 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Therefore, we propose to include in the subject of evidence for the prejudicial inquiry.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Bondarenko, O., Reznik, O., Yevgen, G., Andriichenko, N., & Stohova, O. (2020). Participation of Ukraine in International Cooperation against Corruption. Amazonia Investiga, 9 (29), 407-416. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.29.05.45
Buehnand, A., & Farzanegan, M. R. (2012). Smuggling around the World: Evidence from a Structural Equation Model. Applied Economics, Vol 44(23), 3047-3964 Recovered from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00036846.2011.570715?scroll=top&needAccess=true.
Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. (1988). Recovered from https://www.unodc.org/documents/commissions/CND/Int_Drug_Control_Conventions/
Ebook/The_International_Drug_Control_Conventions_E.pdf
Convention on Psychotropic Substances. (1971). Recovered from https://www.unodc.org/pdf/convention_1971_en.pdf
Duda, A.V. (2010). Circumstances characterizing the identity of the accused as an element of the subject of evidence in a criminal case (doctoral thesis). National University of Internal Assets of Kyiv, Ukraine. Recovered from https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/17847/1/Duda_2010.pdf
Express analysis of the state of crime related to drug smuggling in Ukraine in 2015. (2015). Kyiv: SBU.
Gatiyatullina, A., & Samitov, E. (2019). Preliminary investigation in criminal proceedings. Colloquium-journal Philological Sciences, № 27, 219-222. Recovered from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/predvaritelnoe-rassledovanie-po-ugolovnym-delam/viewer
Goncharenko, V., Nora, V., & Shumila, M. (2012) Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine: Scientific and practical commentary. Kyiv: Justinian. Unfortunately, there is no link on the Internet, the book is only printed.
Groot, L. (2013). Money laundering, drugs and prostitution as victimless crimes. Handbook Chapter, 11, 57-67. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857934000.00013
Ishchenko, V. (2011). Theoretical model of proof in the criminal science of criminal procedure. Forum of Law, № 3, 309-321.
Komissarchuk, Yu. (2011). Definition and content of Criminal Procedure Evidence. Science and Law, № 56, 333-343.
Kostin, M. (2004). The concept of "proof" in the criminal process of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine, № 1, 146–148.
Krasiy, M. (2015) The event of a criminal offense in terms of the basis of criminal liability. Comparative and Analytical Law, № 5, 239-241.
Law № 2341-III. Criminal Code of Ukraine. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, № 25-26, 2001. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14
Law № 435-IV. Civil Code of Ukraine. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, N° 40-44, 2004. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text
Law № 4651-VI. Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 10 9-10, № 11-12, 13, 2012. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17
Law № 60/95-VR. On Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances and Precursors. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, № 10. 1995. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/60/95-%D0%B2%D1%80
Lichtenwald, T. (2003). Drug Smuggling Behavior: A Developmental Smuggling Model (Part 1) By. Forensic Examiner, Nov/Dec 2003 Vol. 12, Part 1, 15–22.
MacKenzie, D. L., Mitchell, O., & Wilson, D. B. (2011). The impact of drug treatment provided in correctional facilities. Issues in children's and families' lives. Handbook of evidence-based substance abuse treatment in criminal justice settings. Springer Science + Business Media. (p. 183–203)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9470-7_11
Malyuga, R. (2014) Proving the event of a criminal offense in criminal proceedings concerning the smuggling of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogues or precursors or falsified drugs. Scientific Notes of Lviv University of Business and Law, № 5, 228-231. Recovered from file:///D:/Downloads/Nzlubp_2014_12_53%20(3).pdf
Nastyuk, V., Mikhailov, O., Izbash, E., & Kondratenko, V. (2020). Judicial control over investigative (search) actions that require prior permission. Amazonia Investiga, 9(28), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.28.04.18
Nikiforchuk, D. (2006). Features of detection and documentation of smuggled drugs to Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of KNUVS, № 1 Part 2, 39-45. Unfortunately, there is no link on the Internet, the paper is only printed
Orlovskaya, N. (2016). On the question of the subject of special confiscation. Latest Criminal Law Research, № 2, 44-47.
Pilnik, V. (2016). Drug smuggling: criminal characteristics and prevention. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University, № 41, 126-129. Recovered from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/nvuzhpr_2016_41(2)__31.
Pirozhenko, O. (2015). Special confiscation: general aspects and evolution of domestic criminal law thought. Bulletin of the Criminological Association of Ukraine, № 3, 70-79.
Podorozhnii, Y., Obushenko, N., Harbuziuk, K., & Platkovska, O. (2020). Legislative regulation of grounds for dismissal of an employee for committing a corruption or corruption-related offense. Amazonia Investiga, 9(26), 304-310. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.26.02.34
Ponomarenko, A., Havryliuk, L., Anheleniuk, A.M., & Drozd, V. (2020). Inadmissibility of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in Ukraine. Amazonia Investiga, 9(29), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.29.05.17
Popelyushko, V.O. (2007). Circumstances mitigating criminal liability and punishment as a subject of protection. Lawyer, №3. 3-7. Recovered from https://eprints.oa.edu.ua/4586/1/Popeliushko_10052016.pdf
Rybalka, O. (2011). The value of criminal procedural evidence. Science and Law, № 133, 15-21.
Shcheritsa, S. (2015). Evidence and proof in criminal proceedings. Bulletin of Zaporizhia National University, № 1(II), 202-208.Recovered from http://rep.btsau.edu.ua/bitstream/BNAU/652/3/Dokazy_y_dokazuvan.pdf
Shevchuk, V.M (2003). Methods of investigation of smuggling: problems of theory and practice: a monograph. Kharkiv: Vulture.
Shibiko, V. (2013). Some novelties of the current CPC of Ukraine need further comprehension and improvement. Law of Ukraine, № 13, 104-111.
Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. (1961). Recovered from https://www.unodc.org/pdf/convention_1961_en.pdf
Sofin, M. (2016). The type and amount of damage caused by a criminal offense, as a mandatory element of the subject of evidence by investigators in criminal proceedings. Scientific Bulletin of the National Academy of Internal Affairs. 99, 2(1), 253-262.
Soroka, S. O. (2015). Circumstances subject to proof in criminal proceedings during the investigation of drug smuggling. Lviv Polytechnic National University Institutional Repository, № 1, 287–291. Recovered from http://ena.lp.edu.ua:8080/bitstream/ntb/30162/1/046_287_291.pdf
Soroka, S., & Rimarchuk, R. (2017). The legal nature of criminal procedural evidence. Bulletin of Lviv polytechnics national university. Series: legal sciences, № 3, 278-283.
Sui, B., Feng, G. & Chang, C. (2018). The pioneer evidence of contagious corruption. Qual Quant, 52, 945–968. https://doi.org 10.1007/s11135-017-0497-4
Torbas, O. (2015). Circumstances to be implemented before drafting a motion on releasing the person from criminal liability.Visnyk Kriminalnogoh Sudochinstva, № 3, 88-94.
Tsimbalyuk, V. (2014). Legal nature of special confiscation. Journal of the National University "Ostroh Academy". Series "Law", № 2(10). Recovered from http://lj.oa.edu.ua/articles/2014/n2/14tvipsk.pdf
Videnko, E. (2014). Civil lawsuit in the criminal proceedings of Ukraine as a "tool" to protect the rights of the victim. Comparative and Analytical Law, № 5, 368–370.
Buehnand, A., & Farzanegan, M. R. (2012). Smuggling around the World: Evidence from a Structural Equation Model. Applied Economics, Vol 44(23), 3047-3964 Recovered from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00036846.2011.570715?scroll=top&needAccess=true.
Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. (1988). Recovered from https://www.unodc.org/documents/commissions/CND/Int_Drug_Control_Conventions/
Ebook/The_International_Drug_Control_Conventions_E.pdf
Convention on Psychotropic Substances. (1971). Recovered from https://www.unodc.org/pdf/convention_1971_en.pdf
Duda, A.V. (2010). Circumstances characterizing the identity of the accused as an element of the subject of evidence in a criminal case (doctoral thesis). National University of Internal Assets of Kyiv, Ukraine. Recovered from https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/17847/1/Duda_2010.pdf
Express analysis of the state of crime related to drug smuggling in Ukraine in 2015. (2015). Kyiv: SBU.
Gatiyatullina, A., & Samitov, E. (2019). Preliminary investigation in criminal proceedings. Colloquium-journal Philological Sciences, № 27, 219-222. Recovered from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/predvaritelnoe-rassledovanie-po-ugolovnym-delam/viewer
Goncharenko, V., Nora, V., & Shumila, M. (2012) Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine: Scientific and practical commentary. Kyiv: Justinian. Unfortunately, there is no link on the Internet, the book is only printed.
Groot, L. (2013). Money laundering, drugs and prostitution as victimless crimes. Handbook Chapter, 11, 57-67. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857934000.00013
Ishchenko, V. (2011). Theoretical model of proof in the criminal science of criminal procedure. Forum of Law, № 3, 309-321.
Komissarchuk, Yu. (2011). Definition and content of Criminal Procedure Evidence. Science and Law, № 56, 333-343.
Kostin, M. (2004). The concept of "proof" in the criminal process of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine, № 1, 146–148.
Krasiy, M. (2015) The event of a criminal offense in terms of the basis of criminal liability. Comparative and Analytical Law, № 5, 239-241.
Law № 2341-III. Criminal Code of Ukraine. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, № 25-26, 2001. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14
Law № 435-IV. Civil Code of Ukraine. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, N° 40-44, 2004. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text
Law № 4651-VI. Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 10 9-10, № 11-12, 13, 2012. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17
Law № 60/95-VR. On Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances and Precursors. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, № 10. 1995. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/60/95-%D0%B2%D1%80
Lichtenwald, T. (2003). Drug Smuggling Behavior: A Developmental Smuggling Model (Part 1) By. Forensic Examiner, Nov/Dec 2003 Vol. 12, Part 1, 15–22.
MacKenzie, D. L., Mitchell, O., & Wilson, D. B. (2011). The impact of drug treatment provided in correctional facilities. Issues in children's and families' lives. Handbook of evidence-based substance abuse treatment in criminal justice settings. Springer Science + Business Media. (p. 183–203)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9470-7_11
Malyuga, R. (2014) Proving the event of a criminal offense in criminal proceedings concerning the smuggling of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogues or precursors or falsified drugs. Scientific Notes of Lviv University of Business and Law, № 5, 228-231. Recovered from file:///D:/Downloads/Nzlubp_2014_12_53%20(3).pdf
Nastyuk, V., Mikhailov, O., Izbash, E., & Kondratenko, V. (2020). Judicial control over investigative (search) actions that require prior permission. Amazonia Investiga, 9(28), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.28.04.18
Nikiforchuk, D. (2006). Features of detection and documentation of smuggled drugs to Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of KNUVS, № 1 Part 2, 39-45. Unfortunately, there is no link on the Internet, the paper is only printed
Orlovskaya, N. (2016). On the question of the subject of special confiscation. Latest Criminal Law Research, № 2, 44-47.
Pilnik, V. (2016). Drug smuggling: criminal characteristics and prevention. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University, № 41, 126-129. Recovered from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/nvuzhpr_2016_41(2)__31.
Pirozhenko, O. (2015). Special confiscation: general aspects and evolution of domestic criminal law thought. Bulletin of the Criminological Association of Ukraine, № 3, 70-79.
Podorozhnii, Y., Obushenko, N., Harbuziuk, K., & Platkovska, O. (2020). Legislative regulation of grounds for dismissal of an employee for committing a corruption or corruption-related offense. Amazonia Investiga, 9(26), 304-310. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.26.02.34
Ponomarenko, A., Havryliuk, L., Anheleniuk, A.M., & Drozd, V. (2020). Inadmissibility of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in Ukraine. Amazonia Investiga, 9(29), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.29.05.17
Popelyushko, V.O. (2007). Circumstances mitigating criminal liability and punishment as a subject of protection. Lawyer, №3. 3-7. Recovered from https://eprints.oa.edu.ua/4586/1/Popeliushko_10052016.pdf
Rybalka, O. (2011). The value of criminal procedural evidence. Science and Law, № 133, 15-21.
Shcheritsa, S. (2015). Evidence and proof in criminal proceedings. Bulletin of Zaporizhia National University, № 1(II), 202-208.Recovered from http://rep.btsau.edu.ua/bitstream/BNAU/652/3/Dokazy_y_dokazuvan.pdf
Shevchuk, V.M (2003). Methods of investigation of smuggling: problems of theory and practice: a monograph. Kharkiv: Vulture.
Shibiko, V. (2013). Some novelties of the current CPC of Ukraine need further comprehension and improvement. Law of Ukraine, № 13, 104-111.
Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. (1961). Recovered from https://www.unodc.org/pdf/convention_1961_en.pdf
Sofin, M. (2016). The type and amount of damage caused by a criminal offense, as a mandatory element of the subject of evidence by investigators in criminal proceedings. Scientific Bulletin of the National Academy of Internal Affairs. 99, 2(1), 253-262.
Soroka, S. O. (2015). Circumstances subject to proof in criminal proceedings during the investigation of drug smuggling. Lviv Polytechnic National University Institutional Repository, № 1, 287–291. Recovered from http://ena.lp.edu.ua:8080/bitstream/ntb/30162/1/046_287_291.pdf
Soroka, S., & Rimarchuk, R. (2017). The legal nature of criminal procedural evidence. Bulletin of Lviv polytechnics national university. Series: legal sciences, № 3, 278-283.
Sui, B., Feng, G. & Chang, C. (2018). The pioneer evidence of contagious corruption. Qual Quant, 52, 945–968. https://doi.org 10.1007/s11135-017-0497-4
Torbas, O. (2015). Circumstances to be implemented before drafting a motion on releasing the person from criminal liability.Visnyk Kriminalnogoh Sudochinstva, № 3, 88-94.
Tsimbalyuk, V. (2014). Legal nature of special confiscation. Journal of the National University "Ostroh Academy". Series "Law", № 2(10). Recovered from http://lj.oa.edu.ua/articles/2014/n2/14tvipsk.pdf
Videnko, E. (2014). Civil lawsuit in the criminal proceedings of Ukraine as a "tool" to protect the rights of the victim. Comparative and Analytical Law, № 5, 368–370.
Published
2021-05-05
How to Cite
Reznik, O., Pochtovyi, M., Yanishevska, K., & Butyrskyi, A. (2021). Proof during the prejudicial inquiry of smugglingof narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs, or precursors under the legislation of Ukraine. Amazonia Investiga, 10(39), 159-168. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.39.03.15
Issue
Section
Articles
.gif)
