Phenomenon of Education: Philosophical and Methodological Aspects of Research
Abstract
The purpose of the work is to identify in the study of education, as a socio-cultural phenomenon, its functional and structural-organizational features at different historical stages of development and to analyze the relation of the concepts of "education", "science" and "intelligence". Methodology and research methods used in the study are the following: comparative analysis method, systematic approach, functional and cultural approaches and philosophical reflection. Key findings are the following: strategy of introducing new standards in the educational process in connection with the transition to digital reality requires changing the educational methodology and creating a new format for the development of teaching methods. The relation between the concepts of "methodology", "education" and "science" are ambiguous, their use is contextual. The main method of analysis of the study of functionality is philosophical reflection, which reveals their meaning and purpose. As a result of the study of the functional, structural and organizational features of education, the necessary object (material or spiritual) of research is created, where the relation between science and education is revealed. The question of the relation of research methodology and methods of the educational process becomes a question of the interactions of spirituality and science, values and knowledge.
Downloads
References
Bakhurst, D. (2013). Mind, Brain, Education. Russian Studies in Philosophy, 11, 50-65. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20860044
Beck, U., & Lau, C. (2005). Second Modernity as a Researcg Agenda: Theoretical and Empirical Explorations in ther “Meta-Change” of Modern Society. The British Journal of Socilogy, 56(4), 525-557.
Belkin, A. (2000). Another paradigm of education. Higher education in Russia, 1, 92-97. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/esche-odna-paradigma-obrazovaniya
Bostrom, N. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: Stages. Threats. Strategies. Moscow: Expo.
Chernigovskaya, T. V. (2013). Schrödinger's Cheshire Cat Smile: Language and Consciousness. Moscow: Publishing House Languages of Slavic Culture.
Cohen, M., & Nagel, E. (2010). Introduction to Logic and the Scientific Method. Chelyabinsk: Socium.
Daggen, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: changing the pace of learning. Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. Available at: https://iite.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Steven_Duggan_AI-in-Education_2020_RUS.pdf
Davenport, T. (2021). Implementation of artificial intelligence in business practice. Benefits and Difficulties. Moscow: Alpina.
Dewey, J. (1920). Reconstruction of Philosophy. New York: H. Holt and Company.
Grechko, P. K. (2015). Onto-methodological discourse of the present: Historical advancement and its challenges. Moscow: LENAND.
Habermas, J., & Blazek, J. R. (1987). The idea of the university: Learning processes. New German Critique, 41, 3-22.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1974). Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Volume 1: Science of Logic. Moscow: Thought.
Humboldt, W. (1985). Language and philosophy of culture. Moscow: Progress. Available at: https://www.phantastike.com/philosophy/yazyk_i_filosofiya_kultury/pdf/
Kant, I. (1993). Criticism of Pure Reason. St. Petersburg: Time-out.
Kireevsky, I. V. (2014). Complete works in two volumes. Moscow: Directmedia.
Kryanev, Yu. V., Motorina, L. E., & Pavlova, T. P. (2012). Philosophy of information and communication systems. Monograph. Moscow: Moscow Aviation Institute Publishing House.
Locke, W. J. (2001). Favorites. Moscow: Publishing House of Shalva Amonashvili.
Milyukov, P. N. (2013). Essays on the history of Russian culture. Moscow: Ripol Classic.
Newman, J. H. (1996). The Idea of a University. New Haven: Yale University Press.
O'Connell, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity. Moscow: Litres.
Pinkovetskaia, I., Lyubovtseva, E., Arbeláez-Campillo, D., & Rojas-Bahamón, M. (2020). Small and medium enterprises in Russia and other countries. Amazonia Investiga, 9(25), 99-106. https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/1034
Prévot, A. C., Clayton, S., & Mathevet, R. (2018). The relationship of childhood upbringing and university degree program to environmental identity: Experience in nature matters. Environmental Education Research, 24(2), 263-279.
Przybylski, P. (2019). A New Model of Education and Upbringing in Polish School. 21st Century Pedagogy, 3(1), 35-41.
Schweizer, A. (1992). Reverence for life. Moscow: Progress.
Shchedrovitsky, G. P. (2003). Guide to Organization, Leadership and Management Methodology. Moscow: Business.
Shumsky, S. A. (2020). Machine intelligence. Essays on the theory of machine learning and artificial intelligence. Moscow: Infra-M.
Tagunova, I. A., Selivanova, N. L., & Valeeva, R. A. (2016). The Category of Upbringing in Russian and Western Studies. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(1), 3-11.
Tsvyk, I. V. (2011). The problem of the relationship of faith and reason in Russian spiritual and academic philosophy of the XIX century. RUDN University Bulletin. Philosophy Series, 4, 41-51.
Vásquez Gastelumendi, D. V., Ríos Campos, C. A., Santamaría Baldera, N., Gutiérrez Valverde, K. S., Camacho Delgado, F. M., Aguirre Zaquinaula, I. R., & Estela Urbina, R. O. (2019). organizational strategies to strengthen the work environment at the Professional School of Medical Technology - Faculty of Health Sciences of the University of Chiclayo. Revista De La Universidad Del Zulia, 10(28), 112-136. Recuperado a partir de https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/rluz/article/view/30602
Vernadsky, V. I. (2013). The tasks of higher education of our time. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 20. Teacher Education, 4, 107-113. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zadachi-vysshego-obrazovaniya-nashego-vremeni
.gif)
