Socio – cultural existence of modern East Mary subethnos
Keywords:
Eastern Maris, ethnic mindset, paganism, traditions of the Finno-Ugric tribes.
Abstract
The article deals with the history, traditions and way of life of sub-ethnic group of the Finno-Ugric tribes –the Eastern Maris, who are considered the "last pagans of Europe". Using specific ethnographic material, scientific and popular-scientific works, the authors showed the unique culture of the Eastern Maris sub-ethnos, pagan beliefs, preserved to date and reflecting people’s social existence, beauty of the traditions and essential national characteristics. The authors draw a conclusion that the Eastern Maris present an independent sub-ethnos tending to self-reproduction. Being amidst the powerful Slavic and Turkic civilizations, the Eastern Marian sub ethnos managed to maintain its national self-identity with some borrowings from neighboring cultures.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Asylguzhin R., Gumerova A. RasselenienarodovIstoricheskogoBashkortostana. (2010): // Vatandash. 2. [Jelektronnyjresurs] // http://www.vatandash.ru/index.php.article.
Bagin S. A. (2011): Gadateli I znahari u carevokokshajskihcheremis – M.: KnigapoTrebovaniju.
Bajdimirov D. A. (2012): Kul'turapovsednevnostinarodamari: avtoref. dis…. kand. ist.nauk. - Kazan.
Barag L.G. Mari traditions of Bashkiria // Folklore of the peoples of the RSFSR. Ufa: 1977
Bilalova L. M., Ivanova O. M. (2007): Socializacijadetejkakstanovleniebiosocial'noj, individual'no-obshhestvennojprirodycheloveka// Socialno-gumanitarnijeznanija. 9.
Carpelan, C. (2006): On archaeological aspects of Uralic, Finno-Ugric and Finnic societies before AD 800. SlavicaHelsingiensia, 27, 78-91.
Cubryakova E.S. The evolution of linguistic ideas in the second half of the XX century (the experience of paradigm analysis) / E. S. Kubryakova // Language and science of the end of the 20th century: collection of books. Art. / ed. Yu.S. Stepanova. - M.: Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1995. - P. 144 - 238;
Ivanov A.G. (1993): MarijcyPovolzhjaiPriuralja. – Joshkar-Ola.
Ivanova O.M., Guriev E. A., Bilalova L.M. (2015) The principal of multiculturalism as the foundation of the new architecture Eurasian society. International scientific magazine «Symbol of science» №11 / 2015 ISSN 2410-700Х_
Gayko, Gennadiy. (2015): Mining constituent of the period of great geographic discoveries. – Skhid. 3 (135).
Gareev I. S. (2014): MarijskiekrestjanePrikamjaiPriuralja v XVIII-pervojpolovine XIX veka. – Birsk.
Georgi I. G. (1799): Opisanievsehobitajushhih v Rossijskomgosudarstvenarodov. - Sankt-Peterburg, 1799 g./Nacionalnyementalitety: ihizuchenie v konteksteglobalizaciiivzaimodejstvijakultur. [Jelektronnyjresurs] //Url.: http://www.national-mentalities.ru.
Golubkin P. S. (1994): Tajna «Sultan-Keremeta». – Tujmazy.
Gulina, O. R. (2013). Attitudes toward Language and Cultural Pluralism in the Republic of Bashkortostan. Bilge Strateji, 5(9).
Guo, S., & Wong, L. (2015). Revisiting multiculturalism in Canada. Rotterdam [The Netherlands]: Boston.
Holliday Vance T. (2010): First peoples in a new world: Colonizing Ice Age America. ByDavidJ. Meltzer. GeographicalReview, 2, 282-285.
Kaliev Ju. A. (2007): O nekotoryhosobennostjahfunkcionirovanijamifologicheskogosoznanijamarinarubezhe XIX-XX vv. Bashkortostan iMarijJel: istoricheskijopytiperspektivysotrudnichestva. – Birsk.40-49.
Kaliev Ju. A. (2003): Mifologicheskoesoznaniemari. Fenomenologijatradicionnogomirovosprijatija. – Joshkar-Ola.
Kozlova K. I. Essays on the ethnic history of the Mari people. M.: 1978.
Kuznecov S. K. Cheremisy. (1880): Bytireligioznyeverovanija. /NarodyRossii. Zhivopisnyjalbom. – SPb. 168-169.
Lallukka, S. (2003). From Fugitive Peasants to Diaspora: The Eastern Mari in Tsarist and Federal Russia (Vol. 328). Academia ScientiarumFennica.
Nikitina Je. V. (2014): Jetnomentalitetmarijcev. - Nacionalnyementalitety. M.: MGUim. M.V. Lomonosova. [Jelektronnyjresurs]// http://www.national-mentalities.ru.
Nikitina Je. V. (2014): Obshhieiosobennye cherty v mentalitetahnarodovPovolzh'jaiPriural'ja.//VestnikBashkirskogoun-ta. T. 19. 2. 634-641. [Jelektronnyjresurs]//Url.: http://www.national-mentalities.ru.
Ng Tseung-Wong, C., &Verkuyten, M. (2015). Multiculturalism, Mauritian Style. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(6), 679-701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764214566498
Perepis' naselenija 1897 goda. - ArhivyBashkortostana (2016) [Jelektronnyjresurs] http://www.gasrb.ru/shegere883.htm/Lfnf
Polevoj N. A. (1833): Istorijarusskogonaroda. T. 1, 62-63.pdf. //vk.com/doc-23433303_83278793
Salminen, T. (2009): In between research, the ideology of ethnic affinity and foreign policy: The Finno-Ugrian Society and Russia from the 1880s to the 1940s. The Quasquicentennial of the Finno-Ugrian Society, 255-62.
Valeev, R. M., Khabibullin, M. Z., Khabibullina, G. Z. (2015): MashanovМ.А. and His Contribution to the Studies of the History and Ethnography of Turkic and Finno-Ugric Peoples of the Middle Volga Region and Cisural Area (1852–1924). Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(5), 197.
Vserossijskajaperepis' naselenija 2010 goda. //[Jelektronnyjresurs] // http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_kuchakkusite/perepis2010
Zeybek, Hasan (2019). Acquistion of Culture and a Historical Approach to the Relationship between Art and Culture, Revista de la Universidad del Zulia, 10 (28), 295-314.
Zvukova E.D. (2010): Cognitive and anthropocentric approaches in the study of paremic formations that reflect the feminine principle (according to VI Dal's collection Proverbs of the Russian People). // Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Russian philology. 3. 68-73.
Bagin S. A. (2011): Gadateli I znahari u carevokokshajskihcheremis – M.: KnigapoTrebovaniju.
Bajdimirov D. A. (2012): Kul'turapovsednevnostinarodamari: avtoref. dis…. kand. ist.nauk. - Kazan.
Barag L.G. Mari traditions of Bashkiria // Folklore of the peoples of the RSFSR. Ufa: 1977
Bilalova L. M., Ivanova O. M. (2007): Socializacijadetejkakstanovleniebiosocial'noj, individual'no-obshhestvennojprirodycheloveka// Socialno-gumanitarnijeznanija. 9.
Carpelan, C. (2006): On archaeological aspects of Uralic, Finno-Ugric and Finnic societies before AD 800. SlavicaHelsingiensia, 27, 78-91.
Cubryakova E.S. The evolution of linguistic ideas in the second half of the XX century (the experience of paradigm analysis) / E. S. Kubryakova // Language and science of the end of the 20th century: collection of books. Art. / ed. Yu.S. Stepanova. - M.: Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1995. - P. 144 - 238;
Ivanov A.G. (1993): MarijcyPovolzhjaiPriuralja. – Joshkar-Ola.
Ivanova O.M., Guriev E. A., Bilalova L.M. (2015) The principal of multiculturalism as the foundation of the new architecture Eurasian society. International scientific magazine «Symbol of science» №11 / 2015 ISSN 2410-700Х_
Gayko, Gennadiy. (2015): Mining constituent of the period of great geographic discoveries. – Skhid. 3 (135).
Gareev I. S. (2014): MarijskiekrestjanePrikamjaiPriuralja v XVIII-pervojpolovine XIX veka. – Birsk.
Georgi I. G. (1799): Opisanievsehobitajushhih v Rossijskomgosudarstvenarodov. - Sankt-Peterburg, 1799 g./Nacionalnyementalitety: ihizuchenie v konteksteglobalizaciiivzaimodejstvijakultur. [Jelektronnyjresurs] //Url.: http://www.national-mentalities.ru.
Golubkin P. S. (1994): Tajna «Sultan-Keremeta». – Tujmazy.
Gulina, O. R. (2013). Attitudes toward Language and Cultural Pluralism in the Republic of Bashkortostan. Bilge Strateji, 5(9).
Guo, S., & Wong, L. (2015). Revisiting multiculturalism in Canada. Rotterdam [The Netherlands]: Boston.
Holliday Vance T. (2010): First peoples in a new world: Colonizing Ice Age America. ByDavidJ. Meltzer. GeographicalReview, 2, 282-285.
Kaliev Ju. A. (2007): O nekotoryhosobennostjahfunkcionirovanijamifologicheskogosoznanijamarinarubezhe XIX-XX vv. Bashkortostan iMarijJel: istoricheskijopytiperspektivysotrudnichestva. – Birsk.40-49.
Kaliev Ju. A. (2003): Mifologicheskoesoznaniemari. Fenomenologijatradicionnogomirovosprijatija. – Joshkar-Ola.
Kozlova K. I. Essays on the ethnic history of the Mari people. M.: 1978.
Kuznecov S. K. Cheremisy. (1880): Bytireligioznyeverovanija. /NarodyRossii. Zhivopisnyjalbom. – SPb. 168-169.
Lallukka, S. (2003). From Fugitive Peasants to Diaspora: The Eastern Mari in Tsarist and Federal Russia (Vol. 328). Academia ScientiarumFennica.
Nikitina Je. V. (2014): Jetnomentalitetmarijcev. - Nacionalnyementalitety. M.: MGUim. M.V. Lomonosova. [Jelektronnyjresurs]// http://www.national-mentalities.ru.
Nikitina Je. V. (2014): Obshhieiosobennye cherty v mentalitetahnarodovPovolzh'jaiPriural'ja.//VestnikBashkirskogoun-ta. T. 19. 2. 634-641. [Jelektronnyjresurs]//Url.: http://www.national-mentalities.ru.
Ng Tseung-Wong, C., &Verkuyten, M. (2015). Multiculturalism, Mauritian Style. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(6), 679-701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764214566498
Perepis' naselenija 1897 goda. - ArhivyBashkortostana (2016) [Jelektronnyjresurs] http://www.gasrb.ru/shegere883.htm/Lfnf
Polevoj N. A. (1833): Istorijarusskogonaroda. T. 1, 62-63.pdf. //vk.com/doc-23433303_83278793
Salminen, T. (2009): In between research, the ideology of ethnic affinity and foreign policy: The Finno-Ugrian Society and Russia from the 1880s to the 1940s. The Quasquicentennial of the Finno-Ugrian Society, 255-62.
Valeev, R. M., Khabibullin, M. Z., Khabibullina, G. Z. (2015): MashanovМ.А. and His Contribution to the Studies of the History and Ethnography of Turkic and Finno-Ugric Peoples of the Middle Volga Region and Cisural Area (1852–1924). Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(5), 197.
Vserossijskajaperepis' naselenija 2010 goda. //[Jelektronnyjresurs] // http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_kuchakkusite/perepis2010
Zeybek, Hasan (2019). Acquistion of Culture and a Historical Approach to the Relationship between Art and Culture, Revista de la Universidad del Zulia, 10 (28), 295-314.
Zvukova E.D. (2010): Cognitive and anthropocentric approaches in the study of paremic formations that reflect the feminine principle (according to VI Dal's collection Proverbs of the Russian People). // Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Russian philology. 3. 68-73.
Published
2020-04-21
How to Cite
Ivanova, O., Guriev, E., Bilalova, L., & Gareev, I. (2020). Socio – cultural existence of modern East Mary subethnos. Amazonia Investiga, 9(28), 311-319. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.28.04.35
Issue
Section
Articles
.gif)
