The institute of counter-security as a novelty of the reform of civil procedure law of Ukraine

  • Roksolana Khanyk-Pospolitak Private Law Department of National University “Kiev-Mohyla Academy” https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6185-7479
  • Inna Kovalchuk Department of Organization of Judicial, Law Enforcement Agencies and the Bar of National University «Odesa Law Academy»   https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4286-8110
  • Igor Bylytsia Department of Organization of Judicial, Law Enforcement Agencies and the Bar of National University «Odesa Law Academy»  https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6971-777X
Keywords: Counter-security, injunction relief, abuse of law, justice, civil process.

Abstract

The article is dedicated to investigation of counter-security as a novelty of the reform of Ukrainian civil procedure legislation. The analysis of rules of the current procedural legislation on counter-security as a novelty of the civil process in Ukraine was made in the article. The determination of features of the institute of counter-security in the mechanism of civil proceedings was given. The role of counter-security in the civil process was identified. The conclusion was drawn that through the institute of counter-security, the principle of equality of parties is ensured, which is manifested in the equal assignment of the defendant to such procedural rights which are effectively identical to the rights of the plaintiff. Therefore, the defendant was granted effective protection against the claim by virtue of the new institute. It is stated that the counter-security should be seen as a way of preventing the plaintiff's abuse of procedural rights and offsetting the potential consequences. The introduction of counter-security is a clear step forward to European standards of quality and efficiency in the administration of justice, however, by examining civil procedural law and jurisprudence, the conclusion was made that the institution is not regulated at this stage of its establishment and application.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Roksolana Khanyk-Pospolitak, Private Law Department of National University “Kiev-Mohyla Academy”

PhD, Head of Private Law Department of National University “Kiev-Mohyla Academy”

Inna Kovalchuk, Department of Organization of Judicial, Law Enforcement Agencies and the Bar of National University «Odesa Law Academy»  

PhD, Professor Assistant of  Department of Organization of Judicial, Law Enforcement Agencies and the Bar of National University «Odesa Law Academy»  

Igor Bylytsia, Department of Organization of Judicial, Law Enforcement Agencies and the Bar of National University «Odesa Law Academy» 

PhD, Professor Assistant of  Department of Organization of Judicial, Law Enforcement Agencies and the Bar of National University «Odesa Law Academy» 

References

Alekseeva N.S. (2017). Protection of the rights and interests of the defendant in securing a claim in the context of the principles of civil procedural law. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhgorod National University, 44 (1), 77 - 80.

But I.O. (2018). Features of the implementation of counter-security under the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine. Retrieved from http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/11300/9465/But%2017-20.pdf?sequence=1.

Kurey M. (2019). Concepts and features of counter-security in the business process. Enterprise, Business and Law, 4, 76 - 81.

Resolution of the Supreme Court of 10.04.2019. Case No. 753/2380/18-c. The Unified State Register of Judgments. Retrieved from http: // ww w.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/81288258.

The decision of Tsuryupinsky district court of May 31, 2017. Case No. 664/1059/17. The Unified State Register of Judgments. Retrieved from http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/66841917

Civil Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine from January 16, 2003, No. 435 –IV. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 40-44, 356.

Code of Civil Procedure of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine of 18.03.2004, No. 1618-IV. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 40-41, 492.

Nekit K., Ulianova H., Kolodin D. (2019). Web-site as an object of legal protection by Ukrainian legislation. Amazonia investiga, 21(8), 222-230.

Luspenyk D.D. (2017). Counter-security as a novelty of the civil process. Retrieved from https://sud.ua/ru/news/publication/107640-zustrichne-zabezpechennya-novela-tsivilnogo-protsesu

Odosiy O. Yu. (2018). Security measures in the civil process of Ukraine. Abstract of PhD Thesis. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv. Retrieved from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:6Ldiq2ECGQ4J:idpnan.org.ua/files/2018/odosiy-o.yu.-zabezpechuvalni-zahodi-v-tsivilistichnomu-protsesi-ukrayini-_d_.doc+&cd=2&hl=ru&ct=clnk&gl=ua&client=firefox-b-d

Ostrovska L.A. (2018). Impose injunctive relief as a mandatory element of the institute of security measures in the civil process. Retrieved from http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/9494

Grosskopf O. & Medina B. (2009). Remedies for Wrongfully-Issued Preliminary Injunctions: The Case for Disgorgement of Profits. Seattle University Law Review, 32:903, 903-941.

Thomas R. Lee. (2001). Preliminary Injunctions and the Status Quo Washington & Lee Law Review, 58, 110-166.

Shurin A.O. (2018). Institute for Securing a Claim: Theoretical and Practical Problems of Implementation. Precarpathian Legal Bulletin, 1 (22), 177-180.
Published
2020-02-21
How to Cite
Khanyk-Pospolitak, R., Kovalchuk, I., & Bylytsia, I. (2020). The institute of counter-security as a novelty of the reform of civil procedure law of Ukraine. Amazonia Investiga, 9(26), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.26.02.3
Section
Articles
Bookmark and Share