Formalized conceptual rule to interpret crisis state of organizational and economic separation for micro-level and meso-level
The relevance of the transformation of anti-crisis management of departments, enterprises and corporate groups in the direction of its intellectualization due to the relevance of external and internal perturbing factors, threats and unfavorability is stated in a reasoned manner. The necessity of a broad interpretation of the crisis state of organizational and economic separation is proved. The objective need for meaningful interpretation and formalized representation of the crisis state of organizational and economic separation in the implementation of all typical management functions – is shown. The applicability of the known development potential is estimated. The components of the rule of recognition of the state of separation as a crisis in the financial and economic aspect is determined in a meaningful and variant way. Versions of the rule of recognition of the state of separation as crisis in relation to the micro-level and meso-level are considered.
Badalova A.G. (2006). Risk management of production systems: theory, methodology, implementation mechanisms. Moscow: Yanus-K.
Belyaev S.G., Koshkin V.I. (2000). Crisis Management: 17-module program for managers managing the development of an organization. Moscow: Infra-M.
Chaika N.K. (2005). Research and development of methods of an estimation of work programs on financial rehabilitation of enterprises: Dissertation of PhD in Economics. Moscow.
Chuprov S.V. (2008). Management of the stability of production systems in the context of innovative modernization: Abstract of a Dissertation of Doctor in Economics. Irkutsk.
Demchenko O.F. (2011). Mathematical modelling methodology of organizational structures of the Russian Federation aviation industry. Moscow: KnoRus.
Dmitriev O.N. (2005). System analysis in management. 5th edition. Moscow: Dobroe Slovo.
Dmitriev O.N. (2017). Strategic problems and directions of developing rehabilitation of managing systems of Russian high-tech complexes. Microeconomics. 6, 5-24.
Dmitriev O.N. (2018). Conceptual problem of criterion pluralism at determinization of usefulness space within scope of management of complex economic objects. Microeconomics. 4. 97-100.
Dmitriev O.N., Dergunov A.I. (2003). Intrafirm management concerning interdepartment and interpersonal competition within scope of enterprise. Moscow: Gnom and D.
Dmitriev O.N., Dergunov A.I. (2004). Intrafirm Management Concerning Interdepartment and Interpersonal Competition within Scope of Enterprise. In English. Moscow: Gnom and D.
Dmitriev O.N., Novikov S.V. (2017). Conception of managing of fuzzy-institutional meso-level organizational separations in a context of product projects internationalization. European Research Studies Journal. 20(4), 277-289.
Dmitriev O.N., Novikov S.V. (2018). Economic Assessment of Federal Scientific Programs. Russian Engineering Research. 38(4), 326-329.
Dmitriev O.N., Novikov S.V. (2019). Concept of Organization and Functioning of Integrated Electronic Infosphere of Reporting on R & D Works’ Results. Amazonia Investiga. 8(21), 87-95.
Dmitriev O.N., Novikov S.V. (2019). Concept of state management doctrine. Amazonia Investiga. 8(22), 238-246.
Dmitriev O.N., Novikov S.V. (2019). Economic Optimization of the Modular Structure of Complex Objects. Russian Engineering Research. 39(6), 503-506.
Dmitriev O.N., Novikov S.V. (2019). Organizational and economic polystructure of innovative projects implementation. Amazonia Investiga. 8(20), 180-187.
Dmitriev O.N., Novikov S.V. (2019). Verification of Feasibility Studies at High-Technology Enterprises. Russian Engineering Research. 39(9), 780-781.
Dubovik M.V. (2009). Methodological problems of a substantiation of strategy of municipal management counterparty and competitiveness of the industrial complex of the Russian cities. Moscow: KnoRus.
Gryaznova A.G. (1999). Anti-crisis Management. Moscow: EKMOS.
Kanashchenkov A.I., Dmitriev O.N., Yekshembiyev S.Kh., Minaev E.S. (2013). Strategic Corporate Management: Fundamental and Applied Problems. 2nd Edition, Corrected and Amended. Moscow: Dobroe Slovo.
Khobta V.V. (2001). Improvement of the mechanism of anti-crisis management of enterprises: Abstract of Dissertation of PhD in Economics. Samara.
Korotkov E.M. (2000). Crisis management. Moscow: Infra-M.
Kurkina I.V. (2002). Methodological aspects of improving the economy of industrial enterprises: Abstract of Dissertation of PhD in Economics. Nizhny Novgorod.
Lapenkov V.I. (2001). Management methodology of the current liquidity of a manufacturing enterprise: Dissertation of Full-Doctor in Economics. Moscow.
Minaev E.S., Panagushin V.P. (1998). Crisis management: Studies. Manual for technical universities. Moscow: PRIOR.
Novikov S.V. (2019). Clusters in modern innovations of the economy of the Russian Federation. Espacios, 40(25).
Novikov S.V. (2019). Conceptual Analysis of Aviation Infrastructure. Russian Engineering Research. 39(4), 354-356.
Pashchuk A. (2005). Risk tamers. Company secret: technology for a successful business. Company's secret. 26, 66.
Popov A. (2005). Anti-crisis management. Moscow: High School.
Provorov A.V. (2009). Mechanism for preventing crisis situations in the activities of enterprise structures: Abstract of Dissertation of PhD in Economics. Vladivostok.
Solodukhin D.N. (2008). Financial recovery of industrial enterprises in bankruptcy: Abstract of Dissertation of PhD in Economics. Moscow.
Volkova O.N. (2008). Principles of budget consolidation in holding companies. Finance and credit. 14(302), 40-47.
Zolotova V.A. (2017). Management problems and tasks of the formation of management innovation anti-crisis program in the Russian high-tech industry. Monograph. Moscow: KnoRus.