Bordyuk (2014) considered the banking
supervision systems of foreign countries. It was
found, that in different countries, there are
various systems of supervision of commercial
banks, which can be centralized or distributed
among different bodies. In many countries, such
as Great Britain, Italy, and the Netherlands, the
central bank is responsible for supervising
commercial banks. Canada and Switzerland have
separate supervisory bodies separate from the
central bank. In Germany, the USA, and Japan,
there is a mixed system, where the
responsibilities of supervision are divided
between the central bank and the state
authorities. There are different types of control
over the activities of commercial banks, such as
state, departmental, and independent. State
control is carried out through legislation that
regulates banking activities. Departmental
control consists of supervision by the central
bank of the country. Independent control is
carried out by independent audit firms. In the
banking systems of developed countries, there
are commercial and central banks. Commercial
banks can be universal or specialized. Universal
banks carry out a variety of banking operations,
while specialized banks specialize in specific
types of operations. In some countries, bank
specialization is mandatory due to legislation, but
many banks are still expanding their operations.
The tendency towards the predominance of one
type of bank in a country may change as a result
of the liberalization of legislation or through the
circumvention of existing laws. For example, in
countries where specialized banks prevail, a
trend towards universalization may appear. After
all, many countries have a combination of both
types of banks in their banking system.
Vlasova (2006) found out the reasons for the
NBU's use of influence measures. It has been
established that the list of grounds for the
application of influence measures by the
National Bank of Ukraine shows that not all of
them correspond to the general grounds defined
in Article 73 of the Law of Ukraine "On Banks
and Banking Activity". This may lead to the
appeal of decisions on the application of these
measures based on part 2 of Article 19 of the
Constitution of Ukraine, which requires that state
and local self-government bodies, as well as their
officials, act only on the basis, within the limits
of authority and in the manner provided for by
the Constitution and laws of Ukraine. In addition,
the method of determining the grounds for the
application of influence measures, outlined in the
Regulation on the application of influence
measures by the NBU for violations of banking
legislation, approved by Resolution of the NBU
Board dated August 28, 2001 No. 369, contains
many assessment norms and causes particular
difficulties in the process of proving the
existence of relevant grounds. In this regard, one
of the vital directions of further research should
be the improvement of the legal regulation of the
grounds for the application of NBU influence
measures, taking into account possible sources of
evidence of the existence of such grounds.
Gotvyanskyi (2016) investigated the current state
of fraud in the field of economic activity.
Dmytrenko (2021) analyzed the peculiarities of
legal regulation of banking relations in the
context of Ukraine's European integration. Thus,
it was noted that Ukraine, having signed the
Association Agreement, undertook to implement
the standards, principles, and legal norms
regulating banking activities in the EU into the
banking legislation. Significant for the regulation
of the banking services market within the EU,
and which have already been implemented or are
subject to implementation into Ukrainian
legislation, according to the authors, are EU
documents containing financial monitoring
mechanisms and the basic principles of financial
institutions. Since these provisions are only
partially integrated into Ukrainian legislation,
work on their consolidation should continue.
Particular attention should be paid to the
harmonization of legislation with the rules,
requirements, and recommendations of the Basel
Committee on Banking Supervision, in
particular, regarding the introduction of
minimum capital adequacy and liquidity ratios to
reduce the outflow of capital from Ukraine.
Given several problems in the banking system of
Ukraine in the period 2015-2020, including
during the financial crisis and pandemic, current
priorities include: strengthening control and
responsibility of financial market participants;
introducing special requirements for indicators of
systemically important banks and other financial
institutions; improvement of the system of
regulation and supervision of financial
institutions; ensuring transparency of activity and
reporting of financial market participants;
transition of banks and non-banking financial
institutions to international financial reporting
standards; reduction of the state's share in the
banking system, etc. The implementation of
these and other measures will contribute to the
adaptation of the Ukrainian banking system to
EU standards, which, in turn, will ensure the
provision of modern and high-quality banking
services by Ukraine's European integration
course.