perceive different types of information, including hidden MI. However, it's important to note that there is
often an unjustified division of essentially the same influence based on the goals of the management subject:
if it's explicit and 'well-intentioned,' it's considered management; if implicit and/or 'pursuing one's own
goal,' it's considered manipulation. For instance, in (Sheynov, 2006), a technology of hidden control is
defined, consisting of stages: '1) collecting information about the addressee; 2) detecting targets of influence
and bait; 3) attraction; 4) compelling the addressee to act; 5) gain for the initiator of the impact ' (Sheynov,
2006, p. 56). There is a somewhat negative connotation with terms like 'bait,' 'compelling'... However,
viewed impartially, any influence involves informational impact, and the distinctions between these
influences are based on the goals of the management subject.
From the perspective of information perception, psychology and sociology focus on the alphabet people
use. In (Kara-Murza, 2017), it's demonstrated how different symbolic systems affect perception, noting that
words can suggest something to a person, influencing their behavior (Kara-Murza, 2017, p. 141). A.V.
Savchenko's work (Savchenko, 2008) explores latent control – covert purposeful impact where the subject
of activity (management object) consciously accepts and implements decisions predetermined by the
subject of latent control. Acting rationally and reasonably, individuals or groups subjected to latent impact,
due to distorted information, lack of knowledge, or biased event assessment, act in the interests of the
subject of latent control (Savchenko, 2008, p. 10-11). The rationale for modeling MI is emphasized. For
this purpose, a DT can be used, including an imitation model of the organization.
In some works (see, for example, (Rogachev et al., 2019)), MI is presented as streams of financial resources.
However, it should be noted that such representation can only be used for certain large-scale management
tasks, as the calculation error becomes significant due to unjustified abstraction from all other factors
influencing the behavior of the social system.
Methodology
We utilize a mathematical agent-based simulation model of a social system, which defines the data structure
required for calculating the system's dynamics and enables the computation of the social system's dynamics
in the SES (Samosudov, 2021; Samosudov, 2019; Samosudov, 2019a; Samosudov, 2021a; Samosudov,
2022; Samosudov & Bagrin, 2022; Bagrin & Matyash, 2022).
The model is based on a resource-functional approach to the analysis of social systems. This approach
assumes an understanding of social systems of various purposes and scales as functional systems that
require a specific resource base, including material, informational, intellectual, social, spatial, and human
time resources. A key condition is the ability to formulate functions correctly and consider resources in the
utmost specificity (Samosudov, 2019), avoiding unnecessary generalizations. The developed
methodological materials allow for precise calculation of the necessary resource base for implementing
specific functions.
The creation of the model was preceded by the following fundamental scientific achievements relevant to
this task (Samosudov, 2012; Samosudov, 2019; Samosudov, 2019a; Samosudov, 2021; Samosudov, 2021a;
Samosudov, 2022; Samosudov & Bagrin, 2022):
• Development of a rigorous theoretical framework describing the dynamics of the social system in the
SES and defining the conditions for functional stability.
• Development of a method for quantitative assessment and consideration of all types of resources,
including intellectual, informational, social, organizational, etc.
• Development of a method for formalizing processes (activities) through the documentation of resource
transformations using multidimensional matrices.
• Development of a method for formalizing the content of documents and informal rules (social
institutions) and their influence on the likelihood of individuals performing certain actions.
• Development of a method for accounting for the systemic activeness of agents.
• Development of a method for reflecting the influence of the environment on agent behavior through
the calculation of gradients at the point of SES.
• Identification of invariants and variable quantities characterizing the process of agent interaction.
This allowed defining a data structure for capturing the state of the social system in the digital twin (DT)
database for dynamic system calculations. The model implements a Markov process, so modeling a specific