security. The author also showed his Britain spy
as a morally burnt-out person, who dreamed only
about retired option. The mystic spy world of the
novel, which was analyzed in the article, portrays
love as a complex emotion that can become a
disaster for all involved persons. Good is not a
real winner and evil is not a permanent looser.
These defeatist attitudes were criticized in
Britain press (Sandis, 2019).
"The Sandcastle" is a novel written by Irish and
Britain writer Iris Murdoch. The novel was
published in 1957. That was a story about a
middle-aged schoolmaster with political
ambitions who met a young artist, came to paint
a portrait of former school headmaster. The
author showed psychological and literal portraits
images of the epoch (Murdoch, 2016).
The texts of these novels show the ways of
representing hidden meanings in English-
language fiction discourse. For example, the
hidden or ambiguous meanings of phrases or
expressions used, which are generally inherent in
English literature, are clearly visible. Therefore,
the material basis of the study is broad, it will
facilitate a detailed and thorough analysis.
Discourse ― the process and result of conveying
meaning, including its generation and perception
meta-linguistic activity, basic linguistic
principles of modeling artistic discourse. Artistic
discourse connects with other types of discourse,
but, at the same time, it differs from them. It, like
other culturally designated discourses, has latent
and actual plans of being/functioning, appears in
particular as unfixed improvisation, written
works, its realization in a collective or individual
reading or acting. These plans define the
foundations of artistic communication, which in
turn give rise to methods of subjective or
objective direction in artistic reality, the
speaker's attitude, is embodied in the "author's
image", the function and role of the addressees
and so on (Durant, 2013). The subject of an
artistic message exists in the conventionally real
or fictional world of the imagination of the author
and its addressee, reproducing the main features
of speech structuring as an actual image, which
includes elements of cognition, prescription,
argumentation, and interpretation. However, the
fundamental difference of artistic discourse from
domestic and other culturally defined discourses
lies, firstly, in its purposeful secondary character
relative to the primary genres of speech and,
secondly, in its fundamental ability to create a
multilevel structure of meanings based on the
vaporization of certain mechanisms of
definitions.
In the early stages of the study of discourse,
scholars considered two basic meanings of the
word. One, which was used in studies of
linguistic structures that go beyond the sentence,
Discourse was practically identified with the
concept of text.
American linguist Harris & Harris (1970) was
one of the first to use the term discourse, who
published an article entitled “Discourse
Analysis”, which dealt with the language of
advertising. It was around the same time that the
concept of discourse was formulated by J.
Habermas. He understood discourse as
communication of a special kind, a specific
dialogue, the aim of which is an impartial
analysis of reality. The participants of
communication (discourse) analyze reality by
rejecting existing speech stereotypes. Here
discourse is understood rather as a way of
acquiring true knowledge. In this interpretation,
discourse acts as a tool for knowing reality ― a
meaningful dialogue with the use of certain
techniques.
Artistic discourse is formed and functions in a
continuous process of formation, where different
forms and kinds of speech form value-marked
paradigms based on socially and culturally
conditioned principles of selection, fixation,
stereotyping, destruction and restructuring of
output stereotypes. Ordinary every day or
socially and professionally specialized
communication situations, all its components
play a predominantly typologically appropriate
role. When there is a transition to artistic speech,
these components acquire a new meaning, which
is, first, a sign of transition to another, non-
domestic poetic dimension, and, secondly,
becomes a carrier of new meanings, not peculiar
to it originally.
This approach to linguistic analysis necessarily
translates the study of textual phenomena of
discourse studying, as the text as a product of the
writer's work is not considered in and of itself,
but as an ingenious component of discourse, the
unity of the message generation process of the
message itself (which is the text) and the process
of perception of this message (Abisheva,
Koldasbaeva, & Ajkenova, 2020).
Obviously, the study of hidden meanings is
appropriate and, in fact, indeed possible precisely
from these positions, because it involves the
cognitive activity of both the author and the
reader.