instead, Art. 10 of the Convention enshrines the
right to freedom of expression, which includes
the freedom to hold one's views, to receive and
transmit information and ideas without
interference from state authorities and regardless
of borders. Therefore, the recommendations of
the Council of Europe "Global principles of
national secrecy and the right to information"
were additionally developed, which try to solve
the issue of reasonable limitation of the scope of
state and official secrets. The author is convinced
that the necessary actions must be taken to
resolve the issue of secrecy practices that still
prevail in the public sector of our country.
Certain aspects of the right to access to
information are analyzed in the work of Yesimov
(2016). The author analyzed the regulation of
access to information, according to the norms of
international legislation, which makes it possible
to formulate several principles that the domestic
legislator should take into account when
regulating this issue. One of them is the
presumption of openness, which means that the
authorities are obliged to provide the requested
information unless there are legal grounds for
refusing to provide the necessary information.
When refusing to provide information, the
authorities are obliged to indicate the reason for
the refusal and its legality. Mandatory disclosure
of information means bringing information to the
public and other dissemination by authorities of
information of public interest. The publication of
key information about the activities of authorities
should become a regular and widespread
practice. For this form of dissemination, all
possible ways should be used, in particular,
information technologies. Additionally, the study
noted that an exhaustive list of exceptions to the
presumption of openness of information should
be established. One of the main criteria for
refusal to provide information should be damage
or a threat to the security of the state.
Kashka (2018) drew attention to the problematic
issues of the implementation of the right to
information. It was concluded that access to
information is the foundation of democratic
development, a tool for ensuring the openness
and control of the government, a means of
increasing the activity of citizens, their
consciousness, and political culture, and a form
of realizing the rights of citizens to receive
complete and objective information. According
to the author, the government should be
interested in its openness, because without it
there is no trust in the measures and reforms that
it initiates and carries out. However, even the
creation of the best possible legislation will not
allow to ensure openness until certain changes
occur in the mass consciousness of civil servants
and society as a whole. As a result, it was
concluded that the right to information is one of
the most important human rights, the realization
of which has social significance and is a criterion
for the functioning of a legal, democratic state.
Practical issues of implementing the right to
information in the conditions of martial law are
disclosed in the article by Lubinets (2023).
Human rights commissioners have noted that
quite often information managers refer to the
legal regime of martial law as a sufficient reason
for applying the postponement, without
justifying the specific existing obstacles to
fulfilling their duty to ensure the information
rights of citizens. In addition, it was noted that
information rights are limited during wartime,
but this does not mean that administrators should
refrain or find reasons for delay.
The issue of international legal protection of the
right to information and the right to information
is considered in the work of Tsymbaliv (2014).
The author concluded that the legal regime of the
right to information is provided for in various
aspects in the national legislation of the EU
countries, but it corresponds to the general
European principles reflected in the acts of
international law regarding the right to
information in relation to the right to
information.
The international experience of implementing
citizens' right access to public information was
studied in the work of Shyshko (2016).
Summarizing the research, the researcher
concluded that a characteristic feature of a
number of countries of the world is that the
process of access to public information from its
carrier (owner) to the user can occur both directly
and with the help of information intermediaries.
The role of such an intermediary is most often
performed by mass media. Journalists, using
various sources of information, perform a
number of social functions. They carry out
search, analysis, selection of informational
materials, and issue a finished product to the
consumer of information. However, the advent of
the Internet has significantly changed traditional
information consumption. Users in this system
have come much closer to the primary sources of
information, sometimes having the opportunity
to contact its creators directly. However, this
does not mean that the role of information
intermediaries will decrease in the future. On the
contrary, it will only increase. As shown by the
foreign experience, in the author's opinion,