188
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.66.06.18
How to Cite:
Yanishevska, K., Kosiachenko, K., Kamyshanskyi, O., Neviadovskyi, V., & Telizhenko, L. (2023). Transdisciplinary theory of the
nature of crime as an expression of a symbiotic complex approach. Amazonia Investiga, 12(66), 188-197.
https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.66.06.18
Transdisciplinary theory of the nature of crime as an expression of a
symbiotic complex approach
Трансдисциплінарна теорія природи злочинності як вираження симбіотивного
комплексного підходу
Received: May 12, 2023 Accepted: June 20, 2023
Written by:
Kateryna Yanishevska1
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3648-5543
Kseniia Kosiachenko2
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1380-218X
Oleksii Kamyshanskyi3
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8460-0035
Vladyslav Neviadovskyi4
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3107-1464
Lyudmila Telizhenko5
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4558-513X
Abstract
The issue of combating crime has always been a
priority for every rule-of-law state. The low level
of crime is a symbiosis of effectively
implementing a system of balanced measures.
However, these measures must necessarily
consider the specific features of the theoretical
perception and awareness of crime as a
phenomenon and features of the formation of the
criminal's personality. The topic of the article is
characteristics of the essence and components of
the transdisciplinary theory of the nature of
crime. The object of research is the symbiotic
theory of crime. The authors used the following
methods: data integration and meta-analysis,
behavioral assessments, collaborative research,
literature review, conceptual mapping and
others. The authors focus on the main research
areas into the nature of the crime,
neurocriminology and behavioural epigenetics as
conceptually new subfields of criminology,
1
Сandidate of Legal Sciences, Associate professor, Associate professor of Department of Criminal Legal Disciplines and Procedure,
Sumy State University, Ukraine. WoS Researcher ID: ABD-3281-2020
2
Сandidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Civil Law Disciplines of the Educational and Scientific Institute
of Law and Innovative Education, Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine. WoS Researcher ID:
HJC-6173-2022
3
Dean of the Faculty of Specialist Training for Preventive Activity Units of the Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs,
Ukraine. WoS Researcher ID: ISV-0699-2023
4
Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Academic Secretary of the Secretariat of the Academic Council of Kharkiv National University
of Internal Affairs, Ukraine. WoS Researcher ID: AAH-3117-2019
5
Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Psychology, Political Science and Sociocultural
Technologies, Sumy State University, Ukaine. WoS Researcher ID: HCW-4566-2022
Yanishevska, K., Kosiachenko, K., Kamyshanskyi, O., Neviadovskyi, V., Telizhenko, L. / Volume 12 - Issue 66: 188-197 /
June, 2023
Volume 12 - Issue 66
/ June 2023
189
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
biological correlates of deviant behaviour and
sociological theories of the nature of the crime.
A qualitatively new symbiotic theory of crime is
proposed, combining a three-element structure:
an autonomous connection of biological
(anthropogenic) factors and sociological ones;
the final connecting element of such a symbiosis
is the human psyche.
Keywords: criminality, crime,
neurocriminology, biological correlates,
sociological correlates.
Introduction
According to the Numbeo service, which forms
the Crime Index, as of 2021, Ukraine ranked 54th
in the world (out of 135) in crime. According to
this indicator, our country was in third place in
Europe after France (UMN, 2021).
During 2022, the year of the war in Ukraine, the
number of registered crimes from November 10
to 30, 2022, compared to the same period last
year, decreased by 4% from 318,100 to
305,700. It also decreased by 6% the number of
reports with signs of criminal offences by - from
89.2 thousand to 83.6 thousand (Ivanova, 2022).
Many economic, social, political, biological, and
psychological factors are at the basis of crime.
Many determinants determine the problem of
combating crime, one of them is the problem of
the "old" vision of crime and "old" methods
caused by conservative views on the genesis of
criminal behavior, which, in turn, directly affects
the system of punishments and determination of
crime. The relevance of the definition of crime as
a transdisciplinary category is the most urgent
problem of modern criminology, overcoming
which will improve the system of measures to
combat crime and thus ensure a reduction in its
level. The purpose of the article is characteristics
of the essence and components of the
transdisciplinary theory of the nature of crime.
The object of research is the symbiotic theory of
crime.
Theoretical framework
With the birth of criminology, researchers tried
to find crime patterns to find the so-called "root
of evil". Scientists consider Ch. Bekaria is the
"father" of criminology, and his first fundamental
work in the field of criminology is his 1764 work
"On Crimes and Punishments." In it, the author
noted his criminal and legal ideas about
punishment for crimes committed, as well as
criminological ideas - ideas about the causes of
crimes (Nezhurbida, 2011). The authors
emphasized their attitude to the mechanism of
public authority's interaction with crime, saying:
"It is better to prevent crimes than to punish them
(Holina et al., 2014).
In the scientific environment, depending on the
nature of the causes of crime, the following
concepts of the causes of crime are distinguished:
mystical or it is also called theological, classical,
biological, sociological, and cultural
(Beschastny, Nazimenko & Lostch, 2017)
Proponents of the theological approach see the
cause of crime in paranormal phenomena
affecting a person and his consciousness, turning
him into a criminal. Also, one of the features of
this approach is its religious basis.
When studying the classical approach, one can
pay attention to the fact that the cause of the
crime is the self-sufficient "bad will" of the
criminal, who depends only on himself and is
fully responsible for his actions. Ch. Beccaria's
formulated approach, unlike the mystical one,
arose under the influence of Enlightenment ideas.
According to this direction, the fight against
crime is reduced to the application of
punishment, and scientists saw its purpose as
influencing people's will so they do not commit
crimes. Such an approach is legalistic and closed.
It acts as a kind of mechanism for regulating
relations in the way that the ruling elite wants it
or as it was accepted at the customary level
(Holina et al., 2014).
As for the biological approach, according to it,
the cause of the crime was not the criminal's
manifestation of the will but the biological
direction of the human body, which in theory can
explain any manifestation of a person's will due
to anthropological factors. Its founder is
190
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
C. Lombrozo. According to him, the fight against
crime should consist exclusively of the influence
of one anthropological factor that causes crimes,
aiming to neutralise them. Hence, the court,
which finds a person guilty of committing a
crime and pronounces a sentence, loses its
meaning, and the court's role should be played by
anthropological expertise (Lombrozo, 1885).
The sociological direction proposes not to
consider the biological aspect (anthropological
factors) under the category of causes but to
define sociological causes and conditions as
critical factors (Humin, 2014). This approach
was formulated by E. Ferry. The antidote to
crime, based on the above, consists in influencing
sociological factors that can influence and
determine the behavior of people beyond their
control, regardless of their condition. Thus, the
author of the crime is the social environment and
not the person of the criminal himself, but this is
a somewhat controversial issue. Therefore, many
scientists cannot accurately name the
environment as the crime's culprit. This field
includes a relatively significant number of
sociological theories.
The cultural approach is almost universal since
by combining classical, biological, and
sociological approaches, the causes of crime are
recognized as factors that have the property of
causing a person's arbitrary arbitrariness, that is,
a state of non-compliance with one's judgment,
social laws, etc. It is worth noting that the causes
of crime are those factors that, at the time of
committing an illegal act, caused a person to
return to the laws and traditions of society and
the laws of social coexistence in which he lives,
fixed in the minds of people. Such an approach
makes it possible to define the range of factors of
preventive behavior more broadly without
alienating all possible moments of a particular
case. In our opinion, it is the closest to defining
the true nature of the crime
phenomenon (Nezhurbida, 2011).
The problem remains that, despite each
approach's autonomy and the cultural approach's
universality, we still need an exact model that
describes the nature of the crime. The nature of
the crime has a two-element system that affects
the third element: it is determined by the
symbiosis of anthropogenic and sociological
factors and their impact on the third element - the
human psyche. These elements are
interconnected, and the detail of their connection
is the human psyche - a component bordering
between the biological (internal) and sociological
(external) components of human consciousness
(will).
We do not start from the result of a criminal act
to determine its essence but offer to delve into the
inner nature of the act itself, find the regularity of
his actions and answer the question of why
precisely the criminal is or becomes a criminal.
After analyzing the approaches to determining
the causes of crime, we can conclude that no
direction can be unequivocally considered
correct due to their weak evidence base. Each
direction considers only indicators specific to it
when considering the causes of crime and, at the
same time, does not consider others at all. We
propose our symbiotic theory of the causes of
crime, which considers crime as the result of the
interaction of anthropogenic and sociological
factors. It is necessary to emphasise the
autonomy of each factor and the fact that the
connecting element between them is the human
psyche.
Methodology
Guided by the transdisciplinary theory, we
delved into a diverse range of disciplines,
including criminology, sociology, psychology,
biology, and ecology, to unravel the
interconnected web of factors that influence
criminal behavior. To lay a solid groundwork for
our study, we embarked on an extensive
literature review, immersing ourselves in the vast
realm of crime, symbiotic relationships, and
complex systems. This thorough examination of
existing scholarship provided us with a
comprehensive understanding of the
multifaceted dimensions of our research topic.
In our pursuit of knowledge within the emerging
subfields of Neuro Criminology and behavioral
epigenetics, we embraced an array of
methodologies to shed light on these intriguing
concepts. Data integration and meta-analysis
proved invaluable as we assimilated and
analyzed information from a myriad of sources,
ranging from neurobiological studies to genetic
databases and criminological surveys. Through
this approach, we sought to discern connections
and patterns across different levels of analysis,
synthesizing findings from multiple studies to
gain a holistic comprehension of the intricate
relationship between neurobiology, genetics, and
criminal behavior. Furthermore, standardized
assessments and behavioral tests allowed us to
objectively measure various aspects closely
linked to criminal behavior, such as impulsivity,
decision-making, or empathy. By forging
Volume 12 - Issue 66
/ June 2023
191
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
interdisciplinary collaborations between experts
from neuroscience, genetics, psychology, and
criminology, we aimed to construct a
comprehensive mosaic of the complex factors
that underlie criminal behavior.
Delving into the realm of biological correlates of
deviant behavior, we embraced an integrative
approach that wove together biological
assessments with psychological, social, and
environmental factors. This multi-faceted
methodology enabled us to unravel the intricate
interactions between biology and other
influential elements, providing us with a nuanced
understanding of deviant behavior.
As we ventured into the sociological realm,
exploring theories of the nature of crime, we
turned to content analysis as a guiding light. We
meticulously scrutinized diverse forms of media,
meticulously dissecting how crime and criminal
behavior were portrayed and represented within
society's fabric. This method of content analysis
helped us discern the cultural and societal
influences that shape perceptions, attitudes, and
behaviors pertaining to crime.
To unravel the sociological correlates of
antisocial behavior, we embarked on a macro-
level analysis that cast our gaze upon the broader
social, economic, cultural, and political factors.
By studying these encompassing elements at the
community, regional, or national level, we
sought to unravel how they mold the prevalence
and distribution of antisocial behavior.
Through our interdisciplinary exploration and the
diverse array of methods employed, we ventured
to illuminate the enigmatic nature of crime and
antisocial behavior. Our scholarly endeavors
sought to forge new paths of understanding,
providing valuable insights into the intricate
tapestry of human behavior and the myriad
factors that shape it.
Results and discussion
Neurocriminology and behavioural
epigenetics as conceptually new subfields of
criminology
The separation of criminological directions in the
determination of crime is due to the
differentiation of the views of various scientists
towards the final determination of the critical
factor that makes a person a criminal. The
symbiotic theory of crime isolates anthropogenic
and sociological factors in a specific autonomous
relationship that leads to internal changes in the
human psyche. Our position is argued by the fact
that the isolation of all other directions is nothing
more than granting autonomy to the
subcategories of the biological or sociological
direction. Our vision of the problem and
symbiotic theory of the nature of crime sees an
autonomous connection between anthropogenic
and sociological factors.
The animal ancestors of man had a biological
essence. The process of their harmonizing
evolution manifested biological and social unity.
It was under the influence of emerging social
needs that the biological evolution of human
ancestors began to change its direction gradually.
By the time Homo Sapiens was isolated, a
particular genetic program unique to this species
had been formulated. Researchers call such a
program "socialized" (Nezhurbida, 2011).
When studying biological factors, specialists pay
attention to such features as, for example, the
type of nervous system, the level of movement
balance and inhibition of the central and
peripheral nervous system, body temperature,
constitution of organs, general physical
condition, stage of physical development,
peculiarities of hormonal background
organization, personal preferences in the field of
intimate relationships, the presence of certain
diseases, as well as gender, age, the influence of
the genetic component, etc. One of the most
contemporary transdisciplinary fields combining
genetics and forensics is behavioral epigenetics
and neuroimmunology.
Neurological understanding may open new
avenues for biological and pathological criminal
and antisocial behavior treatment. For example,
new genome editing tools such as clustered
regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats
(CRISPRs) may one day become available for
the specific genomic modification of defective
MAOA genes. Moreover, deep brain stimulation
has been proposed to suppress aggression
selectively (Franzini et al., 2013) or sex drive.
Such treatment options will raise ethical issues
(e.g., regarding informed consent) for treating
and punishing criminals (Fuss et al., 2015). They
can also lead to the psychopathology of criminal
behavior not currently associated with mental
disorders. Thus, further research into such
procedures and their possible impact on future
sentencing seems very important. In Ukraine, a
similar experience could significantly improve
the already terrible situation with the level of
crime. Also, as noted earlier, similar techniques
could help treat preventive behaviors unrelated to
the individual's mental disorders.
192
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
We emphasize that genetic information can be
used with the principle of risk. The level of risk
is typically assessed using various instruments
that consider known risk factors for criminal
involvement, such as criminal history and
criminogenic personality traits. There can be no
doubt that, in this case, such estimates indirectly
capture at least some level of genetic risk. At the
same time, it would be quite possible to use
genetic testing to determine the genetic risk of
each criminal based on the existing literature
(Beaver et al., 2014). Of course, a limited number
of polymorphisms have been consistently
associated with antisocial behavior. However, as
more polymorphisms are discovered, they, too,
can be added to the list of genes being evaluated.
It can also be argued that there is insufficient
evidence that genetic polymorphisms and
criminal behavior can be associated.
Biological correlates of deviant behavior
Over the past two decades, the use of
neurobiological evidence in criminal trials has
been overgrowing worldwide. Evidence often
includes structural brain imaging,
electroencephalography, and neuropsychological
evaluation. When behavioral genetic evidence
was introduced, it most often included expert
testimony on the heritability of additive disorders
(including drug and alcohol abuse) and gambling
addiction in addition to the genetic basis of
mental illnesses such as depression and
psychosis. A limited number of experts presented
evidence of the defendant's unique genetic risk in
connection with his crime, most often due to the
presence of a genotype with a low-active form of
the MAOA-L gene, which researchers believe is
a neuronal correlate of aggressive and antisocial
human behavior (McSwiggan et al., 2017).
If we talk about biological factors of deviant
behavior, great attention should be paid to the
hormonal system of a person. Since hormones, in
their essence, are mood regulators, we cannot
ignore them in the examination. Scientists
J. Arjen, L. Boender and J. Young say that
neuroendocrinology has a rich history of using
various model organisms to elucidate the general
principles and evolution of the relationships
between hormones, the brain and behavior.
Oxytocin and vasopressin systems have been
studied in many species, revealing their role in
regulating social behavior. Oxytocin and
vasopressin receptors show striking species and
individual differences in brain distribution
associated with various social behaviors
(Boender & Young, 2020). The work results
showed a direct correlation between the level of
certain hormones and behavioral characteristics.
Regarding abnormalities in different parts of the
brain, it should be noted that this should not
cause us any questions because these
abnormalities, like schizophrenia itself, belong to
anthropogenic factors that affect a person's
perception of the world. At the same time, no one
can definitively assert the responsibility of such
persons for the committed illegal act because
they cannot fully perceive the environment. We
propose attributing such anomalies to psychiatric
diseases, which, after accurate medical
confirmation, completely exempt a person from
criminal responsibility.
Scientists are already considering the possibility
of deep brain stimulation (DBS) to reduce sex
drive, which can be applied to sex offenders in
the future. Such interventions on the structure of
the brain may become available and will
undoubtedly lead to controversy in the scientific
field (Meynen, 2016).
M. J. Hoptman, D. Antonius found that frontal
and temporal abnormality are associated with
aggression in schizophrenia. Several other
studies have shown that different areas of the
brain are involved in violence in schizophrenia
(Hoptman & Antonius, 2011). The control of
aggression is multifaceted, and dysfunction of
the functional connection between the amygdala
and the prefrontal cortex tends to predict higher
levels of aggression. The most consistent results
of structural studies have been a decrease in the
volume of the hippocampus and frontal lobe (in
particular, the orbitofrontal and anterior
cingulate cortex) in patients with schizophrenia
with a history of violence or with higher
indicators of aggression. These data suggest that
front limbic dysfunction in schizophrenia may be
associated with aggression or violence (Cho et
al., 2019).
Abnormalities are the cause of illegal behavior.
At the same time, he is convinced that "bad
brains" can be corrected through specific
interventions, emphasizing not so much the
biological as the socio-biological. Protecting the
environment is a critical link in shaping brain
function." By 2034, advanced technologies will
reach such a level that it will be possible, after
studying the biological features of a specific
person (genes, brain anatomy, neurochemistry),
to predict with 79% accuracy whether he will
commit a crime in the next 5 years (Witchalls,
2013).
Volume 12 - Issue 66
/ June 2023
193
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
Gender is also significant. For example, the
"male" hormone testosterone increases
aggression in men and women. At the same time,
the purely "female" hormone estradiol increases
the empathy and emotional activity of the
individual. In this case, we can directly assert a
biologically determined difference in the
behavior of women and men. Such factors must
be considered when deciding on issues of a
judicial nature. Also quite interesting is a study
in which female reviewers claimed to have
committed one or another crime and period of
menstruation. Women are pretty sure that their
"condition" led to such actions on their part.
The level of some aspects in the blood can
correlate with the criminal past of its owner. So,
a group of scientists, which included:
A. Beckley, A. Caspi and others, conducted an
experiment in which 553 people (255 women and
298 men) took part and conducted a blood test for
lead content (Beckley et al., 2018). The study
showed a weak but existing relationship between
the level of lead in a person's blood and the status
of a criminal. Such blood tests are necessary to
consider all the features and more accurately
approach the complete determination of the
crime.
Many recent studies have identified biochemical
compounds potentially involved in aggression
and its subtypes. After analysing them, we can
conclude that, in general, they are focused on
certain classes of metabolites. Because both low
and high levels of aggression can be detrimental
to survival and reproduction, it has been
postulated that aggression is under stabilising
selection, meaning that variation in aggression
will show a significant proportion of heritable
material (Asherson & Cormand, 2016).
Thus, we can conclude that denying the possible
influence of biological factors on forming a
criminal personality is a wrong step. At the same
time, research, and search for biological
correlates of criminal behavior is a necessary step
for the further determination of criminal
offences.
Sociological theories of the nature of crime
Many scientists believe that sociological factors
and external influences cause a person's crime or
illegal criminal behavior. Many theories relate to
the correlation between an individual's childhood
and the likelihood that he will commit a criminal
offence. At the same time, just like the
sociological approach to determining the priority
cause of crime, including the somewhat
controversial one in recognizing antagonistic
contradictions as the fundamental cause of crime,
biopsychological factors, which mainly only
contribute to or complicate the formation of
personality, should not be absolutized in
criminological research causal complex of crime.
Therefore, it is worth agreeing with scientists
who insist on the socio-psychological content of
crime. Accordingly, the cause of crime in the
social dimension should be considered a system
of negative socio-psychological phenomena that
cause contradictions existing in society and the
state and determine crimes (Shevchenko, 2011).
The sociological dimension includes all those
factors and regularities invented by scientists and
proved effective and rational. Thus, there is an
urgent need for a comprehensive analysis of the
main theories of the social connection between
crime and the individual.
Among the many theories of the social spectrum,
such as "social process" theories of the causes of
crime, scientists distinguish three main theories:
1) the theory of differential association; 2) the
theory of differential reinforcement; 3) theory of
social learning. Among them, the most excellent
preference is given by criminologists to the
theory of social learning.
The theory of differential communication
(communication) was formulated by the
American scientist E. Sutherland (18831950) in
his work "Principles of Criminology". The theory
of differential connections states that a person
learns criminal behaviour not because he is prone
to it but because he sees more examples of
criminal behavior (Skinner, 1938).
Another attempt to explain the phenomenon of
crime as a type of learned behaviour is the theory
of differential reinforcement (Differential
Reinforcement Theory DRT), proposed by
L. Ronald Akers and R. L. Burgess in 1966 in the
article "Theory of differential association-
reinforcement of criminal behavior" (Burgess &
Akers, 1966). The proposed version combined
Sutherland's theory of differentiated association
and behavioral psychology - the theory of
reinforcement (Skinner, 1938). Conditioning of
operant behavior is the result of two components:
1) reinforcement (reinforcement); 2) punishment
(relief). Operant learning is observed when a
person voluntarily performs actions to achieve
the desired result, and the environment
determines his actions.
Subsequently, R. Akers improved and renamed
DRT to Social Learning Theory (SLT). In the
194
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
study of deviant behavior and crime using the
"social learning" approach (Akers, 2010).
R. Akers formulated his vision of their reasons:
"The possibility that individuals will engage in
criminal and deviant behavior increases and the
possibility of their normative conformity
decreases when they differentially interact with
other individuals who commit criminal acts and
support concepts that contribute to this, is are
relatively more personally or symbolically
influenced by pronounced criminal/deviant
patterns, define it as desirable or fair in a situation
different from the behavior, and have received in
the past and expect in the current or future
situation a relatively greater incentive than
punishment for the behavior" (Akers, 2010).
Behaviorist theory distinguishes between
positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement,
and punishment for behavior. It states that human
actions that are rewarded (positive
reinforcement) are repeated more often than
those that are not rewarded (negative
reinforcement) or punished. Negative
reinforcement must follow the action to be
effective, as the threat of delayed punishment can
only be effective for future-oriented people,
which is rarely the case with criminals (Shostko,
2015).
J. Toby believed that no one forces a person to be
a criminal (but you can be tempted to do so). In
his writings, he defined his vision of the causes
of crime and noted that man chose his path, and
when the government does not know what to do
with such people, they end up in prison because
they do not have the skills to change them.
Writing about gang violence and socialization,
Tobey argues that the disengaged adolescent was
a candidate for such membership because they
have less stake in the community, fewer stakes in
themselves and fewer matching attributes. This
ties in well with his ideas and concepts of social
control theory (Shostko, 2015). Tobi believes
that policy implications are likely determined by
the side of the victim's constituency, meaning
that politics may cause a criminal to narrow
down his "victims subconsciously."
Durkheim also defined punishment as an act of
revenge. In addition, it should be noted that
Durkheim perceived deviant behavior as usual.
He laid the foundation of the theory of Anomie,
according to which it is impossible to avoid
deviant behaviour since it exists in various
societies. This is normal in the sense that a crime-
free society is over-policed. If crime is wholly
eradicated, no progress or social changes will
occur. Criminality is logically a part of the
primary conditions for the existence of a social
organization. If the criminal does not have the
opportunity to commit an illegal act, he cannot
show himself and his genius. By "anomy"
E. Durkheim understood the state without norms,
without laws (Akers, 2010).
Tarde developed the theory of professional
criminal and criminal imitation. According to
him, crime is a craft, a professional actor. A
professional criminal has unique skills and
techniques. He studied for a long time and
mastered his profession. A professional criminal
has his jargon; in relation to his "colleagues", he
behaves according to a specific code of conduct.
The theory of neutralization "neutralisation" and
drift (drift) "DRIFT" assumes that juvenile
criminals are aware of their responsibility before
the law. This obligation before the law remains
in force most of the time. However, when this
obligation is stretched, juvenile offenders are
prone to crime (Tage & Persson, 2013).
I want to single out theories of the causes of
crime related to psychoanalysis. Such a concept
was widely understood among scientists of the
20th century. The diversity of homogenous
psychological research was determined by the
relatively autonomous development of two
psychoanalytical schools: instinctive and
behaviourist.
Intensivists saw the causes of criminal (in
particular, aggressive) behaviour in the action of
unconscious, instinctive uncontrollable
impulses. Behavior correction was seen as a
solution to internal personal contradictions.
Moreover, Freudians indicate a possible
direction of determining deviant behaviour in a
person using the concept of Freudianism. It
consists of the need for emotional relief for a
person. According to this teaching, the emotional
component of a person constantly increases their
internal reserve. At one point, a person and his
psyche cannot contain this tension and commits
a crime. To unify the act of committing a crime,
in our opinion, in this case, it is necessary to
create special conditions where it will be
accepted in society either not to hold back one's
own emotions (within reasonable limits) or to
implement and experience them more vigorously
and dynamically, which will cause the individual
has the so-called "emotional discharge".
Behaviorists consider crime as a human reaction
to a specific external stimulus (stimulus).
Accordingly, the measures for correcting
Volume 12 - Issue 66
/ June 2023
195
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
undesirable reactions were imagined: a) in the
form of elimination (minimization of the impact)
of relevant situational stimuli; b) changes in
typical reactions-settings. Each of these
concepts, with sufficient justification, reveals a
certain one-sidedness, which prompted scientists
to search for integrative criminological concepts.
In this case, we should discuss the pedagogical
aspect of crime determination. The behavioral
method consists of "programming" a person with
specific reactions to environmental stimuli. On
the other hand, the criminal does not have a
standard reaction system: it is broken due to its
incorrect interpretation at the beginning of the
psychological formation of the individual as a
personality.
In his writings, I want to note that Z. Freud noted
the complete independence of the psyche from
biological factors. We disagree with this opinion
because many studies have shown a direct
correlation between biological factors, such as
hormone levels, and a person's behaviour and
mental state. As O. Shostko successfully notes,
modern criminologists, based on the results of
research by geneticists, biochemists,
neurologists, and psychophysiologists,
increasingly pay attention to the fact that
biopsychological factors play an important and
sometimes decisive role in the aggressive
behaviour of minors and adults, which leads to
committing various crimes against the life and
health of a person (Shostko, 2015).
Sociological correlates of antisocial behavior
The symbiotic theory of crime includes two
dimensions of scientific knowledge, from which
correlates of determining deviant behavior are
found. As of today, much research has been
conducted on the analysis of sociological factors
of crime: from the research of specific scientists
to the determination of the list by special law
enforcement agencies of various countries of the
world.
There is an urgent need to analyze the factors
leading to specialized organizations and bodies.
Let us start with the 10 causes of crime, as
defined by the US FBI: population density and
degree of urbanization; changes in the
composition of the population, especially the
concentration of young people; lack of stability
in the number of the indigenous population
compared to the population that is in permanent
migration: the mobility of life of some categories
of people, pendulum migration and other
transitional factors; mode of transport and
highway; economic conditions, including low
median income, poverty and job availability;
cultural and educational factors, recreational and
religious features; family: divorce and family
cohesion; climate; effectiveness of law
enforcement agencies; administrative and
investigative accents in the activities of state law
enforcement agencies (Nezhurbida, 2011).
This list needs to be completed. We believe these
are only the leading "discovered" causes of
crime. However, there is no exact list, and many
researchers note the absolute uncertainty of the
exact cause of crime. However, there have been
many theories regarding determining the causes
of a particular crime. In such cases, we need to
be guided by the method of deduction, which
starts from the very fact of the crime and its
features.
Additional reasons can be called those that do not
directly affect the personality. For example, the
influence of a subculture can be attributed to the
main one because, in a subculture, an individual
interacts directly and is directly influenced.
Ethno-cultural factors can be called additional:
they affect a person indirectly and can be called
the basis for the main ones.
We focus on the influence of the environment,
namely the influence of subcultural organizations
or groups on the psyche of an individual. Young
people are most often subject to such influence.
This is due to a biological factor: a certain period
of high human activity, for example, puberty. As
we know, because of the peculiarities of their
body, it is teenagers who are most inclined to
single themselves out as an individual belonging
to some subculture. Such influence is often
negative because the ideological component of
basic paradigms and dogmas of such subcultures
is almost always directed against "socially
recognized" and "customary" norms.
For example, a subculture called "AUE" is
widespread in Ukraine and the CIS countries.
The main task of such a subculture is the
introduction of "prison" laws into the country's
social order. At the same time, due to his young
and unformed mental state, a healthy individual
who falls into such a subculture completely
repeats the leader's behaviour in the hierarchy.
This somewhat calls into question the truth of the
social learning theory: a person does not learn -
he repeats everything according to an idealized
commander.
Speaking about the ethnocultural causes of
crime, it is worth noting that migrants are forced
to interact with representatives of the dominant
196
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
culture this is how their adaptation begins. In
this case, the process of adaptation is connected
with the crisis of ethnic identification, which,
according to several scientists, manifests itself,
first of all, in the devaluation of values and
morals, the emergence of feelings of inferiority
and guilt, anxiety, restlessness, fear of the future,
hopelessness, in the emergence suicidal
tendencies, a general lowering of mood, loss of
interest in life, a state of apathy, social self-
isolation, in the manifestation of signs of general
disorganization of behavior.
Its moral, ethical, mental, and physical health
depends on how successful the ethnic group's
adaptation to the dominant culture will be. Based
on the nature of interethnic crimes, a more severe
diagnosis can be made - the degeneration of the
ethnic group. Behavior that deviates from the
norm can be defined as a form of disorganization
of the behavior of an individual or a category of
persons in society, non-compliance with formed
expectations, and moral, legal, and cultural
requirements of society. Then the offence is the
essence of the problems of the individual in the
relationship with society and its culture. One of
the factors of illegal behavior is personality
deviations in socio-cultural identification.
Thus, in the modern scientific environment,
many sociological correlates of criminal
behavior are identified, constituting a massive
system of interrelated factors that influence a
person and make him a criminal.
Conclusions
The work systematizes and summarizes scientific
approaches to determining the nature of the crime,
its biological and sociological correlates, and
scientific theories of crime determination.
Fundamentally new subfields that arose from
scientific modelling between disciplinary and
transdisciplinary approaches to crime
determinism are analyzed.
Relatively new directions of the development of
the science of criminology are highlighted:
neurolaw, neuroimmunology, behavioral
epigenetics, neuroendocrinology. Fundamentally
new approaches and technologies for
determining the causes of crime have been
studied.
Attention is focused on the research of foreign
scientists regarding the finding of biological
correlates of criminal behavior. Such correlates
include gender, hormonal system, brain
abnormalities, cognitive deficits, a low-active
MAOA genome, the level of certain
neurotransmitters in the brain, specific psycho-
emotional states of a person, etc.
Sociological correlates include childhood
problems, family fragmentation, the destructive
influence of a particular subculture, poor
upbringing, various ethnocultural factors, the
economic situation in the country, a destructive
environment, etc.
A new symbiotic theory of crime is proposed, a
transdisciplinary theory of the nature of crime. It
combines a three-element structure: an
autonomous connection of biological
(anthropogenic) factors and sociological ones;
the final connecting element of such a symbiosis
is the human psyche. Thus, the symbiotic theory
of criminality considers the principle of human
integrity, where the model of a complete person
is I and my environment.
Bibliographic references
Akers, R. (2010). Social Learning Theory.
Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Asherson, P., & Cormand, B. (2016). The
Genetics of Aggression: Where Are We
Now? Am J Med Genet Part B 171B,
559-561. Retrieved from:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1
002/ajmg.b.32450
Beaver, K., Jackson, D., & Fleshe, D. (2014) The
Potential Use of Genetics to Increase the
Effectiveness of Treatment Programs for
Criminal Offenders. Recent Advances in
DNA & Gene Sequences (Discontinued),
8(2), 113-118. [online] Retrieved from:
https://doi.org/10.2174/23520922096661502
05111839
Beckley, A. L., Caspi, A., Broadbent, J.,
Harrington, H., Houts, R.M., Poulton, R.,
Ramrakha. S., Reuben, A., & Moffitt, T.E.
(2018) Association of Childhood Blood Lead
Levels With Criminal Offending. JAMA
pediatrics, 172(2), 166173. Retrieved from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29279896/
Beschastny, V. M., Nazimenko, E.U., &
Lostch, S.V. (2017) Criminological theories:
a general concept and characteristics of
individual trends. Problems of jurisprudence
and law enforcement, 1, 91-104. (In
Ukranian)
Boender, A.J., & Young, L.J. (2020) Oxytocin,
vasopressin and social behavior in the age of
genome editing: A comparative perspective,
124(104780) Retrieved from:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/articl
Volume 12 - Issue 66
/ June 2023
197
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
e/abs/pii/S0018506X20301069 (accessed 24
February 2023).
Burgess, R., & Akers, R. A. (1966) Differential
Association-Reinforcement Theory of
Criminal Behavior. Social Problems, 14(2),
128-147. Retrieved from: DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2307/798612
Cho, W., Shin, W. S., An, I., Bang, M.,
Cho, D. Y., & Lee, S.H. (2019) Biological
Aspects of Aggression and Violence in
Schizophrenia. Clinical psychopharmacology
and neuroscience: the official scientific
journal of the Korean College of
Neuropsychopharmacology, 17(4), 475486.
Retrieved from:
https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.2019.17.4.475
Franzini, A., Broggi, G., Cordella, R., Dones, I.,
& Messina, G. (2013) Deep-brain stimulation
for aggressive and disruptive behavior.
World neurosurgery, 80(3-4). Retrieved
from:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2012.06.038
Fuss, J., Auer, M. K., Biedermann, S. V.,
Briken, P., & Hacke, W. (2015) Deep brain
stimulation to reduce sexual drive. Journal of
psychiatry & neuroscience, 40(6), 429-431.
Retrieved from:
https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.150003
Holina, V.V., Golovkin, B.M., Valuyska, M.Yu.,
& Lysodyed, O.V. (2014) Criminology:
General and Special parts. Kharkiv: Pravo.
Retrieved from: https://acortar.link/yZrE2D
Hoptman, M.J., & Antonius, D. (2011).
Neuroimaging correlates of aggression in
schizophrenia: an update. Current opinion in
psychiatry, 24(2), 100106. Retrieved from:
https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e328342
c8e0
Humin, O. (2014) Integrative function of
criminology in the system of human sciences.
Bulletin of the Lviv Polytechnic National
University. Legal Sciences, 7, 175-181.
Retrieved from: https://acortar.link/LyFkpp
Ivanova, K. (2022) Despite the blackouts, the
level of crime in Ukraine has significantly
decreased: the National Police reported the
figures. Blog News Life. [online]. Retrieved
from: https://tinyurl.com/3n5rxabd
Lombrozo, C. (1885). Genius and kindness. A
parallel between great people and poor
people. St. Petersburg: Printing house of the
Society "Public Benefit".
McSwiggan, S., Elger, B., & Appelbaum, P.S.
(2017) The forensic use of behavioral
genetics in criminal proceedings: Case of the
MAOA-L genotype. International Journal of
Law And Psychiatry, 50, 17-23. Retrieved
from: DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.09.005
Meynen, G. (2016) Neurolaw: recognizing
opportunities and challenges for psychiatry.
Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience, 41(1),
3-5. Retrieved from:
https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.150317
Nezhurbida, S.I. (2011) The "enlightenment"
direction of theories of the causes of crime:
idea, essence, consequences. Scientific
Bulletin of Chernivtsi University, Legal
Studies, 6, 91-95. Retrieved from:
https://acortar.link/EP0dik
Shostko, O.Yu (2015) Biological and
psychological theories of explaining the
criminal behavior of minors in the USA.
Theory and practice of jurisprudence, 1(7),
14-18. Retrieved from:
https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-
detail?id=354922
Shevchenko, O.V. (2011) Causes and conditions
of corruption crime. Bulletin of the High
Council of Justice, 3(7), 122-132. Retrieved
from: http://surl.li/hrfbb
Skinner, F. (1938) The Behavior of Organisms:
An Experimental Analysis. Appleton-
Century. Retrieved from:
https://acortar.link/O12dV9
Tage, I.A., & Persson, О. (2013) The Sutherland
tradition in criminology: a bibliometric story.
Criminal Justice Studies, 26, 1-18. Retrieved
from:
https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2012.706
753
UMN (2021). Crime in Ukraine: how the
situation changed in 2013-2020. [online]
Retrieved from: https://umn.ua/news/7304
Witchalls, C. (2013) Are we born to be bad? A
new book explores the link between biology
and breaking the law. The Independent, 29
May [online] Retrieved from:
https://acortar.link/VOD9K2