determines its respectful, sometimes sublime
solemn perception”, as K. Prykhodchenko points
out (Prykhodchenko, 2021, p. 273).
Of course, mythological layers have not
disappeared also in Ukrainian postmodern
novels, where the images of water emerge
repeatedly, and water is also referred to in terms
of ratio, which adds more weight to its
symbolism. The purpose of the article is to select
the most striking artistic images of the river, sea,
and water as element and substance created in
Ukrainian postmodern novels, and to identify
their artistic features and functions in the text.
Theoretical framework
Water, as one of the four basic elements – earth,
air, fire, and water – that structure the world, has
prompted cultures of different nations to form
ambivalent cosmogonic archetypal concepts, in
which, on one hand, it acts as an object of
creation, and on the other hand, it participates in
creation as a subject of creation. In the system of
symbols, water is a symbol of fertility, the
beginning and end of all things on Earth,
purification from sins (the rite of baptism for
Christians), death and resurrection from the dead,
purity and health (Potapenko et al., 1997, p. 29).
For example, Lazar Baranovich, emphasising the
omnipotence of the absolute, “speaks about
God’s right hand, which governs everything and
saves everything in the stormy waves of the
restless sea of the world” (Levchenko,
Liamprekht, Zosimova, Varenikova, Boiko,
2020, p. 66). In particular, he notes: “Wiele na
tym morzu potonęło, co się śmieło, bez tego
wiosła, bez prawicy Pańskiey, ktorą tonącego
Piotra ratowała, puśćili. Ieśli się łodką puśćisz na
te morze, patrz ieśli masz takiego Styrnika,
ktoremi wiatry y morze byli posłuszne”
(Baranowicz, 1676, p. 334), – this image
embodies the Omnipresence of God, His
benevolence, which, in turn, instils hope of
salvation and reward for our life’s work that is
eternal life (Levchenko, Liamprekht, Zosimova,
Varenikova, Boiko, 2020, p. 66). The archetype
of water has been the subject of research by
scholars in the analytical psychology by
C. G. Jung (Jung, 2018), (Jung, 1996), mythic
criticism by N. Frye (Frye, 2021), onirism of
primordial elements by G. Bachelard (Bachelard,
2004), and ethnology by M. Eliade (Eliade,
2001).
Methodology
The study uses elements of archetypal analysis to
study the archetypes of water as expressions of
the unconscious essence of the writer,
subordinated to a specific purpose. The technique
of text interpretation is based on the hermeneutic
method. The method of comparative analysis was
used to search and identify similarities and
differences in the images of water based on
empirical studies of Ukrainian postmodern
novels.
Results and discussion
The texts of Ukrainian postmodernists
demonstrate different models of the image of
water, which are subordinated to the artistic
purpose in each particular novel.
Rivers and interfluves are the main component of
the image of the city in the novel “Mesopotamia”
by S. Zhadan: “The sun was broking through the
fog, and the city was filled with light, voices and
sounds, waking up from sleep and letting go
dreams. The city stood on the hills, in the
interfluve, washed by rivers on both sides. In the
valley that opened up below, the first workers’s
houses and schools were already there <...>”
(Zhadan, 2014, p. 130). In the novel
“Voroshilovgrad”, the river is a part of the
suburban landscape: “<...> from the north, the
city was surrounded by a river, flowing from
Russian territory towards Donbas. Its left bank
was gentle, while along the right bank high chalk
mountains stretched, the tops of which were
covered with tarragon and thorns” (Zhadan,
2011, p. 34); “Fog rose from the river, hiding the
small figures of fishermen and the nearest huts,
spilling out onto the road and creeping into the
suburbs. Outside the city, there was also white
fog in the gullies, and the whole valley gently
blurred before our eyes, like a riverbed, falling
into darkness, although here, on the hills, it was
still quite light” (Zhadan, 2011, p. 55).
Water is a wonderful substance in which a
creative person feels comfortable and draws
inspiration and creative strength from his or her
contact with it: “What a reward it is that even
here, in a dirty dungeon <...> there is hot water,
what a drive it is, completely beyond the
understanding of many <...>. I want to be here
forever! To forget about everything, close my
eyes and surrender to the water like a lover. You
wrote most of your poems in hot water. Because
in hot water, you can be great, kind, brilliant, and
yourself at the same time. And fuck them all”
(Andrukhovych, 1997, p. 123). According to the
understanding of Yu. Andrukhovych, water is
personified and is an inexhaustible source of
creativity; water is sacralised in the depiction of
the ritual of ablution, after which it plunges into