198
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.64.04.19
How to Cite:
Zakharov, V.Y., Ivanova, A.N., & Suzdaleva, T.R. (2023). Labor migration in modern Russia: features, problems and ways to solve
them. Amazonia Investiga, 12(64), 198-207. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.64.04.19
Labor migration in modern Russia: features, problems and ways to
solve them
Трудовая миграция в современной России: особенности, проблемы, пути их
решения
Received: April 12, 2023 Accepted: May 22, 2023
Written by:
Vitaly Yu. Zakharov1
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4308-5943
https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/IQT-4203-2023
https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57222963113
https://elibrary.ru/author_profile.asp?id=325611
Anna N. Ivanova2
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5868-5503
https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/IQT-4645-2023
https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57222961706
https://elibrary.ru/author_profile.asp?id=1067263
Tatiana R. Suzdaleva3
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8051-7143
https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/IQT-4710-2023
Abstract
Based on the scientific study of Russian and
foreign experience, the article analyzes modern
migration problems and the main directions of
finding ways to solve them. The authors pay
special attention to the regulation of labor
migration and the adaptation of foreign-cultural
migrants in modern Russia, taking into account
the experience of Western European countries
and the specifics of Russia. The result of the
study is a number of recommendations based on
the accumulation of successful models of
migration policy.
Keywords: adaptation, integration, migration
policy in Russia, migration processes,
multiculturalism.
1
Doctor of Historical Sciences, Head of Department of History, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russia;
Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of Department of History, Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University),
Moscow, Russia; Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of Department of Russian History, Moscow State Pedagogical University,
Moscow, Russia.
2
PhD in Historical Sciences, Associate Professor of Department of History, Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research
University), Moscow, Russia.
3
PhD in Historical Sciences, Associate Professor of Department of History, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow,
Russia.
Zakharov, V.Y., Ivanova, A.N., Suzdaleva, T.R. / Volume 12 - Issue 64: 198-207 / April, 2023
Volume 12 - Issue 64
/ April 2023
199
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
Introduction
Adaptation and integration of migrants of a
different culture into the society of the host
country is an important direction of migration
policy in any state that attracts foreign labor
resources. This problem has acquired special
significance in modern Russia, especially in the
last decade. This problem is very complex and
multifaceted. Therefore, it is no coincidence that
the draft law on social and cultural adaptation
and integration prepared several years ago by the
Federal Agency for Ethnic Affairs (Russia) has
not yet been adopted.
The problem of migration affects not only
Russia. It is relevant and important for all states
that need additional labor resources, including
European Union. The problem of migration
includes two components: the problem of
refugees and the problem of labor migration
(legal and illegal one). This article is devoted to
the second of them. It will examine the current
state of knowledge of the problems of labor
migration, the main conceptual apparatus, and
will also analyze the most important problems
associated with labor migration in modern Russia
in comparison with the solution of these
problems in other countries. First of all, this is the
problem of regulating the entry and exit from the
country of labor migrants, including their
possible deportation. It is closely related to the
problems of regulating the labor relations of
migrants with employers and their taxation. The
problem of extending the system of medical care
and medical support to migrants, as well as the
problem of teaching migrant children in schools
will also be considered. Finally, more general
problems are of interesting: the language
problem and the problem of communications
with the local population, including the question
of the degree and forms of inclusion of migrants
in the system of values of the host country. In
conclusion, the authors offer their vision of these
problems and recommendations on possible
directions for their solution.
Theoretical Basis
The complexity of intercultural communication
and various methodological positions of
researchers did not allow to fully forming the
conceptual apparatus, there are multiple
interpretations of these terms. Most Russian
experts believe that adaptation primarily
concerns labor and return migrants. Integration is
seen as a process of integration into all spheres of
life in the host country, including the acquisition
of citizenship, and refers mainly to non-return
migrants.
An ambiguous approach to this issue is
evidenced by studies showing that the
intensification of these processes does not always
lead to a decrease in the conflict potential of
society.
The concept of multiculturalism, which was used
in many European countries, did not justify itself.
The idea of cultural diversity and equality of all
ethnic cultures, mutual respect for identity could
not be fully realized (Suzdaleva & Fedorov,
2019). This approach has led to the localization
of foreign crops, which threatens the social and
national security of the states of the European
Union (EU). This problem became especially
acute after the virtually uncontrolled influx of
migrants under the guise of refugees from Asian
and North African states in 2015-2016 during the
Libyan and Syrian crises, primarily to Germany,
Austria, Denmark and the Benelux countries.
There is another danger as well. One of the
leading experts in this field I.V. Sledzevsky
believes that the main culture, as a result of
interaction with the culture of the immigrant
minority, loses more than it gains. The exchange
of part of the space of one's identity for elements
of other cultures violates the internal stability of
the main culture, can lead to fragmentation, and,
ultimately, to the loss of national identity
(Sledzevsky, 2013). This is especially evident in
the example of Germany and Denmark, where in
many cities entire neighborhoods have already
appeared, populated by migrants, who actually
ousted the local population from there, leading a
specific lifestyle and not wanting to accept the
lifestyle, norms of behavior and values of the
host country and, moreover, seeking to impose
their cultural, religious norms and traditions on
the autochthonous population.
At the beginning of the second decade of the XXI
century, the concept of "interculturalism" began
to spread, aimed at the dialogue of cultures and
religions, at constructive practices in order to
strengthen the well-being of the country of
residence (Kuropyatnik & Kuropyatnik, 2018).
But the forms and ways of intercultural
interaction in this context are still in the process
of searching and testing.
We can single out the following problems that
any country that receives labor migrants,
including Russia, faces:
200
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
problem of regulating the relationship of
migrants with the local population, including
the question of the degree of their inclusion
in the value system of the host country;
problem of regulation at the legislative level
of entry and exit from the country of labor
migrants, including their deportation;
problem of regulating labor relations
between migrants and employers, including
extending the social security system to labor
migrants;
problem of adaptation of labor migrants
from foreign-speaking and other-
confessional states and regions, including
the problem of communication with the local
population;
problem of taxation of labor migrants;
migrants and the health care system;
migrants and education (teaching children of
migrants in schools if they come to Russia
on a long-term basis and inviting students
from countries that supply migrants).
Methodology
The article is problem-theoretical in nature.
Therefore, the authors used the traditional
methods of historical disciplines. First of all,
these are the methods of logical analysis and
synthesis, the method of structural-functional
analysis and the problem-analytical method,
which made it possible to reveal the essence of
the above problems related to the adaptation and
integration of labor migrants and offer
recommendations for their solution. Statistical
methods and methods of content analysis and
factor analysis were also used. In addition, the
authors proceeded from the fundamental
principles of objectivism and historicism, which
made it possible to approach the analysis of the
problems posed in an unbiased manner, with the
maximum consideration of existing approaches
and points of view, respect for the opinion of
specialists and, at the same time, taking into
account the peculiarities of the specific historical
situation in modern Russia.
Results and Discussion
Migration issues do not lose their relevance, as it
is showed by numerous publications of
economists, politicians and sociologists in Russia
and abroad (Alonzi, 2018; Anthony, 2008;
Gilliat-Ray, 2010; Kubbir, 2010; Zemtsov, 2014;
Krasinets, 2020; Radchenko & Suzdaleva, 2015;
Ryazantsev, 2018; Suzdaleva, 2016; Shustov,
2020). In Western Europe, migration policy is
connected with the solution of the refugee crisis
and with labor migration (the share of which
varies from 6 to 20% of the employed population
in different countries). Russia in 2019 was
among the top five countries in terms of the
number of international migrants (Shustov,
2020).
The social and psychological situation in
European countries, which a few decades ago
took the path of multiculturalism in migration
policy, shows that this approach did not
contribute to the painless entry of migrants into
the national environment of their new homeland.
By continuing to adhere to the customs and
traditions of their countries, migrants generate a
certain amount of xenophobic tension. Despite
the rather high level of tolerance in Russia, most
often hostility is caused by Muslim migrants who
arrived from Central Asian countries (Tajiks and
Uzbeks are in the first place in this row, Kyrgyz
at the end of the top ten).
The intensity of migration flows depends on a set
of factors that force potential migrants to leave
the country of residence and attract them to the
country of residence. Migration in the Russian
Federation either decreased as in 2016
(devaluation of ruble, changes in migration
legislation), then increased again as in 2019. In
2020, after the borders were closed due to the
pandemic, it decreased again (Krasinets, 2020).
The need to attract migrants is caused by
economic and demographic reasons. First of all,
this is a shortage of labor resources due to low
birth rates, especially in sectors of the economy
with low wages and where a high level of
qualification is not required (drivers, janitors,
workers in the housing and communal sector,
builders), as well as the ability of entrepreneurs
to save on wages labor. The situation in this
sphere between Russia and EU countries is
basically similar. At the same time, in Russia, the
positive effects of the influx of labor migrants
usually include the following:
compensation for the shortage of labor (in a
number of regions, the shortage of workers
reaches 30%);
migration increases the GDP of the Russian
Federation and its reduction negatively
affects the growth of national income;
low wages for migrants keep many small
and medium-sized Russian companies
competitive;
provides labour-surplus neighboring
countries with jobs and minimizes social
discontent in these states, thereby
maintaining social and political stability.
Volume 12 - Issue 64
/ April 2023
201
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
At the same time, labor migration in Russia,
primarily from the states of Central Asia,
generates certain costs:
no taxes are levied to the Russian budget
from the funds that migrants transfer to their
homeland. At the same time, they are an
important part of the income of a number of
states. For example, remittances to
Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan account for more
than a third of the budget of these countries;
migratory sources of labor force preserve the
low level of wages;
growth of everyday xenophobia in relation
to migrants creates a threat to social and
national security and increases conflict
(Ryabova & Bormotova, 2015; Suzdaleva,
2016).
At the same time, there are serious problems, the
main of which are the controllability of the flow
of migrants and their adaptation in the host
country, taking into account a different linguistic,
religious and cultural affiliation. The specificity
of the migration situation in Russia lies in the
possibility of relatively free entry into the
country of citizens of the CIS (primarily from the
countries of Central Asia) in accordance with
agreements on a visa-free regime between the
states that are members of the CIS. Now we are
going to show the official statistics.
Of the total number of 13 392 897 foreign
citizens (FC) and stateless persons (SP)
registered with the Ministry of Internal Affairs
(Russia) in January-December 2021, 4 961 301
arrived in Russia from Uzbekistan, 3 076 781
from Tajikistan and 1 063 328 from Kyrgyzstan.
Thus, in 2021, about 68% of migrants were
residents of Central Asian countries, brought up
in an ethnic and cultural environment that is
significantly different from Russia.
Among labor migrants, their share is much
higher. According to the Ministry of Internal
Affairs (Russia), 9 530 934 (FC and SP) came to
Russia for the purpose of work during this period,
of which 4 519 618 came from Uzbekistan, 2 439
198 from Tajikistan and 884 133 from
Kyrgyzstan. Consequently, people from the
Central Asian republics make up about 82% of
labor migrants.
It can be assumed with a high degree of certainty
that the vast majority of these people consider
Russia as a source of income and do not intend to
join its cultural values and traditions.
In this regard, the most important is the problem
of regulating at the legislative level the entry and
exit from the country of labor migrants, including
their deportation.
In recent years, the rules for entering the country,
the principles and procedures for the
employment of FC have changed significantly.
The practice of regulating the influx and
distribution of foreign labor on the basis of
quotas and permits in 2015 was supplemented by
the introduction of a system of patents from visa-
free countries. In 2017, work was intensified to
identify guest workers who had patents based on
documents that did not correspond to the place of
residence. For a year after the revocation of the
patent, FC could not reuse this opportunity, but
as a result of gaps in the legislation, guest
workers could use them in turn. In 2021, a
decision was made to introduce electronic
patents, primarily in Moscow (Ledeneva &
Kononov, 2021).
At the end of 2020, the Main Directorate for
Migration Affairs (Russia) (MDMA) announced
the rejection of the institution of quotas and the
issuance of permits to attract and use foreign
workers. According to experts, labor migration
should be determined solely by the availability of
vacancies that are not in demand by Russian
citizens. Migration, according to experts, should
be purposeful "under the order" of certain
industries and regions. In 2021, the issue of
simplified recruitment of foreign workers in a
number of sectors was being worked out. It was
considered expedient to create electronic
registers of foreign workers and interested
employers.
Back in 2018, the issue of introducing an
additional fee for arriving migrants was
considered in case of possible deportation. This
practice exists in one form or another in a number
of European countries. For example, in Denmark
there is a law that allows the confiscation of
property from refugees for the cost of their
accommodation in the country. In Switzerland,
working immigrants are required to compensate
for all expenses for their employment (Suzdaleva
& Fedorov, 2019; Potemkina, 2020).
For a minor violation, the practice of deportation
to their homeland at their expense, under the
control of law enforcement agencies, was
introduced with the simultaneous inclusion of
information about their deportation in MDMA
database. Such a measure was supposed to
replace the months-long stay in a special
detention center at the expense of taxpayers. The
202
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
process of stay in Temporary Detention Centers
for FC and expulsion is complicated by the
shortage of official court interpreters from the
languages of the peoples of the CIS and the use
of non-specialists who do not know professional
terminology, as a result of which the possibilities
of familiarizing themselves with court decisions
in their native language or filing an appeal are
limited.
Since 2018, a mechanism has been tested to
identify illegal foreigners, as well as employers
evading insurance premiums from their wages.
Along with MDMA, Federal Service for Labor
and Employment (Rostrud) began to engage in
this area (Shustov, 2020; Ledeneva & Kononov,
2021).
In connection with the search for adaptation
forms and strengthening control over the
movement of migrants, employers were obliged
to maintain constant communication with foreign
workers, conduct systematic explanatory
conversations about their rights and obligations
in their country of residence, moreover, support
them in case of lack of money and be in
correspondence as need. Employers should
potentially be generally responsible for creating
acceptable conditions for migrants. Experts
believe that employers will continue to prioritize
indigenous people, since there are many
difficulties when registering visitors, and you can
get a huge fine for illegal migrants (Krasinets,
2020; Ledeneva & Kononov, 2021).
In Russia, in 2018, it was planned to simplify the
naturalization procedure for highly skilled
migrants from the former Soviet republics. But
already in 2020, MDMA issues refused to make
this approach absolute. Specialists often turned
out to be unskilled workers. Among those
entering the Russian Federation, only 17% have
a higher education (Krasinets, 2020).
MDMA also proposed to simplify the acquisition
of Russian citizenship by successful foreign
students, who in 2017 numbered less than 330
000. More than a half of them are from the CIS
(high growth in the number of students is
recorded from Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan,
Ukraine, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan). For
comparison, the maximum rate for the exchange
of students is observed in European countries is
2030% (Alonzi, 2018; Potemkina, 2020).
The statistics of issuing work permits is
interesting, which is seen as the first step towards
granting Russian citizenship. In 2021, 93 031
work permits were issued (versus 62 686 in
2020). Of these, 46 691 were issued to highly
qualified specialists (20 528 in 2020) and 6 830
to qualified specialists (7 690 in 2020). There is
a positive trend, but even among migrants who
have issued a work permit, highly qualified and
qualified specialists make up only about 43%,
that is, less than a half (CIS Internet Portal,
2021). Thus, even among legal migrants, the
majority are low-skilled and uneducated
workers. They know Russian little bit or do not
know it at all and try to stay together, almost not
communicating with the Russians. In some areas
of Moscow and the Moscow region, enclaves
populated by migrants have formed. In families,
migrants speak their native language. Therefore,
their children are often not ready to study in
Russian schools. On the other hand, teachers are
experiencing serious difficulties in their
educational and upbringing work due to the
influx of children who do not know the Russian
language.
Here we are faced with one of the most difficult
problems associated with the adaptation of
migrants: the language problem and the more
general problem of communication between
migrants and the local population, in this case
Russian-speaking. Indeed, without knowing the
language of the host country, there is no any
normal adaptation and integration.
Since the mid-1990s, mainly representatives of
the Slavic peoples came to Russia, who did not
need linguistic and cultural adaptation.
According to MDMA, of those registered in
2021, more than 80% were citizens of
Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (Selected
indicators of the migration situation in the
Russian Federation for January-December 2021
with distribution by country and region, 2021).
The adaptive capacity of people arriving from
Central Asia is declining every year, especially
for young people (which is the result of the
derussification policy in a number of Central
Asian states). Therefore, since 2003, the
procedure for obtaining citizenship began to
include testing for knowledge of the Russian
language.
Since January 2015, in order to obtain a work
permit and obtain a corresponding patent, it has
also become mandatory to obtain an appropriate
certificate for knowledge of the Russian
language, culture and fundamentals of law.
However, as practice has shown, this rule does
not work for seasonal workers, especially in the
field of private construction (private houses,
cottages, dachas, etc.). In addition, there is also a
corruption component of this problem. For
Volume 12 - Issue 64
/ April 2023
203
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
example, a fifth of foreigners who had a
document on passing exams did not pass the
retest (Suzdaleva, 2016).
Since 2017, the control mechanism for obtaining
a passport has been strengthened by changing the
procedure: a foreigner applying for Russian
citizenship is required to take an oath of respect
for the traditions and laws of the Russian
Federation. As a result, those who did not pass
such a test were deprived of citizenship by a court
decision. But attempts to illegally acquire
Russian citizenship, including through false
certificates, continue.
One of the ways of adaptation of migrants,
confirmed by world practice, is the creation of
special centers in countries that are migration
donors. The Strategy of the State National Policy
of the Russian Federation for the period up to
2025 refers to “promoting the study of the
Russian language in countries where migrants
come from” (Decree of the President of the
Russian Federation 1666, 2012). Since the
early 1990s, the Korean Education Center has
been operating in Uzbekistan, the Korean
language is studied in a dozen educational
institutions, and there are training centers where
the relevant documents are issued for the
movement of labor migrants to this country.
German and American centers operate in
Tajikistan, etc.
Russian centers in this context not only did not
become widespread, but individual projects for
their creation did not take place (for example, in
Tajikistan in the first decade of the XXI century).
The opportunity was missed in the middle of the
second decade, when the Ministry of Education
of Tajikistan announced its desire to certify
compatriots for knowledge of the Russian
language in their country, where profile courses
and the Russian-Tajik Slavonic University
functioned. The organization of Russian cultural
and educational centers in the states of Central
Asia is in its infancy.
It was only in 2017 that a decision was made to
create Russian centers in the countries of
"suppliers" of migrants, a plan for their retraining
for work in the Russian Federation. For example,
at the end of 2018, according to an
intergovernmental agreement, the official offices
of Uzbekistan for external migration began to
function in the capital and other cities of Russia.
In the former republic, centers were opened
where those wishing to work in the Russian
Federation could draw up the necessary
documents for arriving in Russia. In 2019, as a
result of an organized recruitment, only a little
more than 2 thousand people arrived, and the rest
hundreds of thousands on their own. At the same
time, an agreement with Tajikistan was signed
and ratified. Potential migrants have the
opportunity to prepare an appropriate package of
documents and learn the basics of the Russian
language in their homeland at employment
service centers (although there are almost no
local teachers of the Russian language left). And
today, according to experts, it is more expedient
to begin training migrants “at the start” in the
countries from which they come, on the basis of
Russian consular institutions and cultural centers
(Ryazantsev, 2018; Ledeneva & Kononov,
2021).
At the end of the first decade of the XXI century,
an attempt was made, with the assistance of the
Russian Orthodox Church, to create centers for
the integration of migrants with the aim of
teaching the Russian language and legal literacy.
However, a number of experts rightly questioned
the feasibility of teaching Muslim migrants on
the basis of the Russian Orthodox Church
(Suzdaleva, 2016; Shustov, 2020).
The language problem is closely related to the
problem of educating migrant children (in case of
their long stay in Russia or the intention to obtain
Russian citizenship). The essence of the question
is whether to create preparatory classes for the
children of migrants (especially from the
countries of Central Asia) to learn the basics of
the Russian language before entering school or
specialized classes in the schools. It seems to us
that the experience of Western countries
(England, Germany, Netherlands, USA), when
classes are staffed exclusively by migrants and
the school does not become an integration tool,
can hardly be applied in Russian realities. But at
the moment there is no Russian target adaptation
program for children of migrants.
Faced with difficulties in this matter, the staff and
administration of educational institutions
initiated a number of projects and proposals:
opening of specialized classes, faced with
behavioral problems of children of migrants;
administration of one of the lyceums, with
the help of employees, conducted raid-
conversations with migrant parents whose
children did not study, including due to legal
and departmental restrictions;
parents and teachers offered to organize
preparatory classes for those who did not
master the Russian language well and
204
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
thereby hampered the learning of other
students;
there is a question of training specialist
teachers to work in a migrant environment,
focusing on fostering respect for the
traditions of the host country (Ryabova &
Bormotova, 2015; Suzdaleva, 2016).
In order to prevent illegitimate improvisations
due to cultural differences in the educational
environment, there is a need to develop
methodological materials on the norms of
Russian legislation for school teachers. It is
necessary to intensify the preparation of
educational and methodological literature in
order to improve the skills of specialists in the
field of interethnic communications. An
integrated approach to the adaptation of migrant
children of preschool and school age is required,
including before coming to the Russian
Federation in Russian schools in the countries of
departure.
Another problem associated with the adaptation
of migrants is the obligatory consideration of the
ethno-confessional factor. On the one hand, the
host country should not interfere with the
performance of religious rites. But on the other
hand, it is necessary to take into account the
possibility of introduction and spread of ultra-
radical religious movements of extremist and
terrorist orientation. In our opinion, in solving
this problem, a significant role belongs to the
imams of mosques in Russia, who have a
predominant influence on Muslim believers. In
many ways, it depends on them, under whose and
what influence migrants from the Central Asian
republics will find themselves. Therefore, the
organization of special courses for imams on the
territory of Russia, as well as the establishment
of more thorough control over the personnel of
the Russian imamat, suggests itself. The issue of
monitoring the activities of imams is also acute
because many of them received theological
education in foreign educational institutions.
Only in the North Caucasian Federal District
there are more than 150 of them. And according
to the representatives of MDMA for the North
Caucasian Federal District, it is necessary to have
information about whether they adhere to the
foundations of traditional Islam. Specialized
courses for imams are needed in all regions with
compact Muslim populations.
According to experts, imams in mosques should
not only convey the ideas of “peaceful” Islam,
but also identify among Muslim visitors who
need socialization, answer their questions
(Ledeneva & Begasilov, 2021).
For these purposes, it is necessary to use not only
traditional forms of communication. Muslim
migrants, as a rule, are young people; they are
looking for answers to pressing questions on the
Internet. The Russian muftiate does not yet fully
use this kind of communication. Productivity in
this context is not facilitated by an extensive and
competing system of religious power structures:
the former Central Spiritual Administration and
the New Council of Muftis, the presence of many
religious spiritual administrations.
To work in a migration environment, qualified
personnel with a theological education,
knowledge of Islam, etc. is needed. It is
important to involve prominent religious
scholars, practitioners who know the specifics of
the fight against jihadist ideology. Such work
requires an integrated approach: to educate
believers in mosques and to speak to student
audiences and in the media.
The migration policy of European countries
shows that for migrants (especially Muslim ones)
in the first place in self-perception is not the
citizenship of the host country, but
confessionality.
The confessional vector of adaptation is
effectively used in the capital. In Moscow,
imams preach mainly in Russian, explaining that
in the country of residence one must know and
use the Russian language.
In 2018, the Association for the Psychological
Assistance of Muslims was established, which
established cooperation with the relevant
departments of higher educational institutions in
Kazan, Bashkiria, universities in Pyatigorsk and
Karachay-Cherkessia. Since July 2020, the
"Center for Legal Protection and Cultural
Adaptation of Migrants" began to function, to
which more than two dozen Russian regions have
joined (Ledeneva & Begasilov, 2021).
A successful solution to the problem of
communication and adaptation of migrants is
complicated by the fact that psychological
tensions arise not only between Russians and
migrants from Central Asia, but also between
Russian Muslims and Muslim migrants. The
former do not always fully accept visiting fellow
believers, which can largely be due, on the one
hand, to the low-paid work of migrants and the
corresponding standard of living, and on the
other hand, in some cases, they see them as
potential competitors. In addition, the influx of
migrants to the capital and other regions has
complicated the performance of religious rites
Volume 12 - Issue 64
/ April 2023
205
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
due to the excessive occupancy of mosques.
Experts noted that the attitude varies and,
depending on the regions, “residents of the
Caucasian republics treat people from Central
Asia more kindly than native Muslims from the
Urals or the Volga region” (Ledeneva &
Begasilov, 2021).
At the same time, during the pandemic, Russian
Muslims provided comprehensive assistance to
fellow migrants.
Another important problem is the problem of
social adaptation of migrants. This refers to the
extension of labor legislation to them, including
the norms of labor protection, social security and
medical care, so that they do not feel like second-
class people.
Labor migrants from the EAEU countries have
the opportunity to receive all types of benefits for
reasons of temporary disability, etc., they are
credited with work experience, documents on
education in many specialties are recognized, and
an agreement on pension provision was ratified
in 2021 (Gaeva, 2019).
World experience shows that integration policy
is effective mainly at the regional level. Studies
of the integration of migrants in different cities of
the Netherlands and Belgium, which are similar
in composition of visitors, show that different
practices are used: in some, the emphasis is on
socio-economic integration, in others, on
cultural. A number of regions in Italy, Spain,
Finland and Sweden also have their own
integration plans (Potemkina, 2020). Russian
experts suggest using this experience more
intensively: creating special commissions at the
regional level that will consider and resolve
issues of employment, education, use individual
contracts with municipalities, etc.
In 2019, based on the Concept of the State
Migration Policy of the Russian Federation for
2019-2025, adopted in 2018, optimization of the
management of adaptation and integration of
migrants is outlined, the task of “creating
conditions” for solving the problem, “creating a
migration situation” conducive to interethnic and
interfaith harmony is indicated, and attention is
focused on sociocultural adaptation. The
implementation of social and cultural adaptation
of FC is entrusted to the Federal Agency for
Nationalities (Ledeneva & Kononov, 2021).
In accordance with the goal of migration policy,
defined in the newly adopted Concept, the
Federal Agency for Nationalities Affairs has
taken the first steps to create a unified system for
alerting threats and conflicts in the national
sphere. Federal monitoring should be based on
data from state, public and expert organizations.
Different methodological principles are applied
in different regions: in Saratov and Perm regions,
vertical monitoring is based on data from
municipal authorities, in Tatarstan it is based on
data from independent centers and closes on the
administration of the President of the Republic of
Tatarstan (Ledeneva & Kononov, 2021).
Conclusions
In recent years, the government has taken the
following measures to adapt and integrate labor
migrants into Russian society:
from June 2021, Russian language, history
and legal proficiency testing will take place
every three years (instead of five). The
complexity of the tests is determined in
accordance with the migration status;
labor migrants from the EAEU countries got
the opportunity to receive all types of
benefits for reasons of temporary disability,
etc., seniority is counted, documents on
education in many specialties are
recognized, and in 2021 an agreement on
pension provision was ratified;
the (model) Labor Code for the CIS member
states is adopted;
the Migration Code is developed but not
adopted;
the creation of unified information platform
for recording foreign workers, including
their digital profiles, is under development.
Based on modern realities, it is necessary, using
proven practices, to develop new adaptation
mechanisms for migrants. The unresolved nature
of these issues leads to an increase in migrant-
phobia and in the shadow sector of the economy,
and to processes that disintegrate society. This is
the reason for the need to adopt a draft law on
social and cultural adaptation and integration,
which was submitted to the State Duma several
years ago.
Our recommendations are the following:
it is necessary to create special language
centers in donor countries (primarily in
Uzbekistan and Tajikistan) and in Russia,
including regional centers of socio-
psychological assistance for migrants and
teaching them the basics of the Russian
language. Here it is supposed to intensify the
activities of the Federal Agency for the
206
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
Adaptation of Migrants, which at the
moment is more of a bureaucratic structure
that has little to do with practice and reality;
it is necessary to clearly define the strategy
of the state migration policy, which,
unfortunately, is not yet available and rather
resembles a policy of a kind of "swing" due
to the struggle between two trends: the
interests of large corporations (especially in
the construction business and housing and
communal services), advocating the removal
restrictions and an increase in the influx of
labor migrants, and the interests of state
security, which imply tightening migration
rules and reducing the influx of migrants to
Russia. For example, in December 2020, the
Russian authorities extended the terms of
temporary residents due to the pandemic
until June 15, 2021. However, already in
April 2021, MDMA announced the
expulsion of migrants from the CIS
countries illegally staying in Russia until
mid-June, which should have contributed to
their return to their homeland (in the spring
of 2021, more than 330 000 from
Uzbekistan, 120 000 from Kyrgyzstan and
about 250 000 from Tajikistan, etc. were
staying illegally in Russia) (Ledeneva &
Kononov, 2021);
it is necessary to clearly legislate the legal
status of migrants, systematize their rights
and obligations in a special Migration Code,
as well as guarantees against illegal actions
on their part (for example, a clear definition
of the procedure for expulsion from the
country);
the need to focus on highly qualified
personnel, either by inviting ready-made
specialists for special projects (which is
widespread in Western countries, whose
experience, positive and negative, of course,
must be taken into account), or by working
with foreign students, including from the
same Central Asia;
there is a need, together with experts on
migration, national relations and
psychologists, to develop a comprehensive
program for the integration of underage
migrants into the educational space and
Russian society. The first steps have already
been taken (collection of effective practices
for the adaptation and integration of
migrants and teaching aid for working with
migrant children in educational institutions
have been prepared), but this is clearly not
enough. There is no consistency on a
national scale.
In conclusion, it should be noted that the study of
migration issues, considering ethno-cultural and
confessional factors, the accumulation of
successful models of adaptation of migrants in
different regions and the experience of socio-
cultural adaptation of previous generations from
a foreign cultural environment will contribute to
the development of optimal migration strategies.
Bibliographic references
Alonzi, R. (2018) Migration processes and the
construction of the identity of the European
Union. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship
University of Russia (RUDN). Series
"Political Science", 20(2), 167-176.
Anthony, B. (2008). British experience (report at
the round table "Muslims in the EU and
Russia"). Herald of Europe, 1. (In Russian)
CIS Internet Portal (2021). Migration situation in
the Russian Federation for 2021. Available
at: https://e-cis.info/cooperation/3823/99651/
Decree of the President of the Russian Federation
№ 1666. Strategy of the State National Policy
of the Russian Federation for the period up to
2025. President of Russia from 19.12.2012.
Available at:
http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/36512
Gaeva, A.S. (2019). Migration processes in the
Eurasian space. Russia and the Modern
World, 1, 209. (In Russian)
Gilliat-Ray, S. (2010). Muslims in Britain: An
Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Krasinets, E. S. (2020). Foreign labor force in the
Russian labor market: problems and
solutions. Population, 23(1), 104-118.
Kubbir, N. (2010). Young British Muslims:
Identify, Culture, Politics and the Media.
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Kuropyatnik, A. I., & Kuropyatnik, M. S. (2018).
Interculturalism: Post-cultural discourse of
social integration. Bulletin of the RUDN.
Series Sociology, 18(2), 250-261. (In
Russian)
Ledeneva, V. Yu., & Begasilov, B. T. (2021).
The influence of the religious factor on the
integration of Muslim migrants in Russia.
Management Issues, 4(68), 118-130.
Ledeneva, V. Yu., & Kononov, L. A. (2021).
State and municipal regulation of the
processes of adaptation and integration of
migrants in modern Russia: monograph.
Moscow: RUDN. (In Russian)
Potemkina, O. Yu. (2020). Multilevel migration
management in the European Union. Modern
Europe, 2, 100-110. (In Russian)
Radchenko, A. F., & Suzdaleva, T. R. (2015).
Migration processes in modern Russia:
Volume 12 - Issue 64
/ April 2023
207
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
Political forecasting in Management.
Moscow: Ethnosociety and international
culture.
Ryabova, E. L., & Bormotova, T. M. (2015).
Adaptation problems of interethnic migration
(on the example of the Russian Federation).
In: Council on Interethnic Relations under the
President of the Russian Federation.
Moscow: Interethnic Relations under the
President of the Russian Federation.
Ryazantsev, S. V. (2018). Integration of migrants
in the context of Russia's foreign migration
policy. Sociological Research, 1, 105-111.
Shustov, A. V. (2020). Circular migrations
between Russia and the CIS countries in a
crisis: scale and consequences. Bulletin of the
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia.
Series: Political Science, 22(3), 415-427.
Sledzevsky, I. V. (2013). Multiculturalism: a
fragile balance between integration and
disintegration. Social Sciences and
Modernity, 2, 131. (In Russian)
Suzdaleva, T. R. (2016). Migration processes in
the context of geopolitics. Bulletin of Tomsk
State University. Philosophy. Sociology.
Political science, 3(35), 237-244. (In
Russian)
Suzdaleva, T. R., & Fedorov, K. V. (2019).
Immigration policy in the modern world:
problems and prospects. Proceedings of the
2nd International conference on
contemporary education, social sciences and
ecological studies (cesses 2019). "Advances
in Social Science, Education and Humanities
Research", 14171420.
Zemtsov, B. N. (2014). Law as the ideological
value of power. Bulletin of Tomsk State
University. History, 4(30), 28-34. Available
at: https://cutt.ly/6G