250
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.62.02.25
How to Cite:
Abdullsttar Sadiq, D. (2023). Enhancing vocabulary learning through understanding the human memory system: Episodic
memory. Amazonia Investiga, 12(62), 250-257. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.62.02.25
Enhancing vocabulary learning through understanding the human
memory system: Episodic memory
(        :  )
Received: January 19, 2023 Accepted: March 28, 2023
Written by:
Dilveen Abdullsttar Sadiq1
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8990-7589
Abstract
Vocabulary acquisition in learning languages is a
crucial aspect of language learning, and effective
teaching theories are essential for the retention
and application of new vocabulary. However,
understanding the memory system is important
for educators to design and implement effective
vocabulary teaching strategies that support
student learning and retention. This article
provides a comprehensive overview of the
human memory system, including sensory, short-
term, and long-term memory, with a focus on the
differences between semantic and episodic
memory. It explains the impact of episodic
memory on vocabulary recall. In addition, it puts
forward two teaching theories that enhance the
utilization of episodic memories. Experiential
Learning and Elaboration Theory focus on
connecting vocabulary with personal experience
for episodic memory and using previous
knowledge to help students remember new
vocabulary.
Keywords: Memory system, vocabulary
learning, episodic memory, long-term memory.
Introduction
Vocabulary learning is an essential part of
learning a language because it is the basic
building block of any language, and it is vital for
understanding and communicating.
Remembering vocabulary is one of the
challenging tasks students face while learning a
language, and teaching them to remember can be
even more rigorous. Every teacher must
understand the memory system because it helps
them to design and implement effective teaching
strategies that support student learning and
retention. The human memory system is a
1
Ma, Assistant Lecturer, English Language Teaching Department, Faculty of Education, Tishk International University, Erbil/Iraq.
complex and multi-faceted process that involves
the encoding, storage, and retrieval of
information. The three main types of memory are
sensory, short-term, and long-term memory.
Sensory memory is a brief, immediate record of
sensory information such as visual and auditory
stimuli. Short-term memory, also known as
working memory, allows for the temporary
storage and manipulation of information. Long-
term memory is responsible for the permanent
storage of information and can be further broken
down into declarative and non-declarative
Abdullsttar Sadiq, D. / Volume 12 - Issue 62: 250-257 / February, 2023
Volume 12 - Issue 62
/ February 2023
251
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
memory (Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968). The non-
declarative memory includes skills and habits
that are performed automatically while
declarative memory includes memories that can
be consciously recalled, such as semantic
memory and episodic memory. Semantic
memory refers to our general knowledge about
the world, including concepts, meanings, and
facts that are not tied to a specific time or place.
For example, knowing the capital of France
(Paris), the meaning of the word "book" or the
fact that dogs are mammals are all examples of
semantic memory.
Episodic memory is the ability to remember
unique past events (Tulving, 1983). This type of
memory receives and stores information about
the context in which an event occurred including
what happened, where, and when. In humans,
episodic memory develops around the age of 4
(Riggins, 2016) and declines with advancing age
(Gaesser et.al, 2015). For example, remembering
your first day of school, your wedding day, or a
vacation you took are all examples of episodic
memory. Episodic memory is intricately linked
to our sense of self and allows us to remember
our personal past experiences. Nikolaev et al.,
(2023) divided memory into two large
contrasting systems where knowledge is captured
by semantics and experience is captured by
episodic. If the intensity of the experience is
high, then it is likely that the corresponding
knowledge or information will be more easily
retained in memory. Although he conceded that
while some processes, such as selective
information intake and retention from perceptual
systems and information transmission to other
systems, are likely shared between episodic and
semantic memory, there are enough differences
to consider them as separate entities. Tulving
believed that the information and representation
format of the systems were fundamentally
different; he saw episodic memories as
dependent on spatial and temporal relationships,
while semantic memory was based on concept-
based, meaning-associated relationships (Brigard
et al., 2022).
The purpose of this study is to conduct an
extensive review of the memory system in
humans, focusing on both semantic and episodic
memory. Additionally, the study aims to
investigate how episodic memory can be utilized
to improve vocabulary retention in a classroom
setting. Two theoretical frameworks are
presented that proposes the connection of new
vocabulary with personal experiences to enhance
episodic memory. By exploring the potential
benefits of these theories, this study aims to
provide insights into effective methods for
improving vocabulary learning and retention in
educational contexts Finally, we discuss the
potential implications of this literature review for
broader topics related to the application of
methods that help students remember vocabulary
easily through theories that support episodic
remembering.
Methodology
A narrative synthesis is an approach used
systematically to collect and combine data from
multiple studies. First, the relevant studies about
the topic are summarized and interpreted
individually. The studies are assessed for their
quality, and the relationships between the studies
are explained. The information from the studies
is synthesized to develop an overall
understanding of the topic. One way to present
the information gathered during a narrative
synthesis was to use a diagrammatic
representation, which can help to summarize the
study overview of the memory system. In
addition to the narrative synthesis, based on the
review of the literature and the researcher's
understanding of the memory system, two
theories were formulated. These theories aimed
to provide a more comprehensive understanding
of how the memory system works and how it can
be studied in different contexts. These theories
may provide a useful framework for future
research in this area.
Theoretical Framework
The Memory System: Semantic and Episodic
Episodic and semantic memory are two
processing systems that receive information from
the perceptual system. The nature of storing
information is a cognitive and autobiographical
reference. Endel Tulving first founded episodic
memory to refer to the ability to remember things
based on personal experience (Tulving, 2001).
Since then, the concept has developed
considerably. It is called autographic memory.
This type of memory is necessary to remember
important events in human life that emotion
affects. We can remember the date, how we felt,
and the word we expressed. Such first day of
school, the moment you fall in love, or what you
had for dinner yesterday (Tulving, 1983).
In his recent work, Tulving argued that activating
episodic memory is retrieving information from
     
example, episodic memory does not mean
remembering your first day of class but also
252
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
remembering the experience in the class for the
first time (Tulving, 2002). Retrieving
information in episodic memory results in people
remembering what they experienced, which can
be recognized as self-awareness. Episodic
memory also can be knowledge and skill and the
same time. For example, swimming is a personal
experience and a skill simultaneously. The
degree of accuracy in remembering an event in
episodic memory relies on access to the context
in which the event happened. The context is the
physical surrounding in which the event
happened (Nikolaev et al., 2023).
Two critical factors of context that affect
episodic memory are the time and the location of
an experience (Gershman & Daw, 2017).
Episodic memory has a set of unique operations
to organize, store and retrieve information. It is
temporarily organized; in another way, it is like
a movie, and the person is in it. One of the
characteristics of episodic memory is to recall
information from the experience of the event.

Tulving considers this kind of experience self-
knowing awareness (Tulving, 2002). Episodic
memory is not only capable of recalling past
experiences, but also it can time travel to the
future. This feature is exclusive only to episodic
memory. It is not possible for other kinds of.
Emotion is another important factor that affects
episodic memory; they are part of an episodic
       
retrieval cue to access knowledge. However, the
stronger the emotion when the event is
experienced, the better the retrieval. Emotional
events are generally easier to remember than
non-emotional events. People reported that the
extremely emotional experiences that are a part
of trauma are often difficult to forget.
Conway et al., (1992), and Debra and Herbert
(2001) have extended Tulving's memory
awareness constructs to real-world learning
situations and investigated how information
processed during specific learning episodes, such
as university lectures, can become conceptual
knowledge over time. Initially, knowledge is
retained in episodic form, which students can
remember specifically. However, as learning
progresses, these memory representations shift
from being primarily episodic to being more
conceptual, generalized knowledge that students
simply know.
On the other hand, semantic memory refers to the
general knowledge that we know, whether it is
about concepts, facts, or beliefs (Martin & Chao,
2001). Semantic knowledge is independent; it
does not refer to any circumstances which were
originally acquired. For example, the knowledge
the ball is round is a semantic memory, whereas
the time and place you played with a ball are
considered an episodic memory. According to
Jones et al., (2014), model I semantic memory
stores information like computers. In his model,
each word is stored with links to another word.
For example, if what is stored for canary in our
brain is the yellow bird that can sing, then the two
words that are linked to it are yellow and singer.
General information about the bird which is
flying feathers are not stored separately for each
kind of bird. Instead, the fact is canny is a bird so
that all birds can fly. This mode is called a
hierarchical model of semantic memory (Collins,
& Quillian, 1967). The links in this model
formed a hierarchical tree structure, with a top-
down classification of animals into subcategories
(e.g. birds, fish). This structure enabled the
model to explain both general concepts and
specific information in a single framework.
Accessing knowledge required navigating the
tree to the relevant branch, and the model was
effective in explaining human performance in
early sentence verification tasks (such as quickly
confirming "a canary can sing").
Volume 12 - Issue 62
/ February 2023
253
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
Figure 1. Schematic descriptions of the system of memory
Neuroscience of Semantic and Episodic
Memory
Studying the affected brain area of a patient is the
most efficient way to determine the function of
specific activities in the brain (Debra. Herbert,
2001). The damage to the areas surrounding the
hippocampus including the hippocampus and
surrounding regions, including the para
hippocampal gyrus, the entorhinal cortex and the
temporal lobe can result in episodic memory loss
as it has been observed in a patient with
alzheimer's disease who cannot recall a personal
experience of an event. As semantics requires the
representation and recollection of spatial
locations, the left prefrontal cortex is likely to be
involved in remembering information (García-
Lázaro et al., 2012).
On the other hand, semantic memory involves
the identification of the objective.
Neuroscientists have not yet proposed a
consensus analysis. However, patients with
damage to the temporal lobes often have
difficulty naming objects and retrieving
information about object-specific characteristics
(Gershman & Daw, 2017). This suggests that
object-specific information may be stored, at
least in part, in the temporal lobes. Recognizing
this location has been done through patients with
a semantic impairment which they called
semantic dementia. The term semantic dementia
is used to describe patients with semantic
impairment. They lose the ability to recognize
familiar objects and people so what they say is
characteristically empty. They are fluent in
graphology and syntactic structure (Martin &
Chao, 2001).
Tulving demonstrates a model of memory for
remembering or recalling information. He said
our cogitative memory system consists of 4
types: perceptual presentation, working,
semantic, and episodic memory. He argued that
information is stored in the cogitative system
serially. However, information can be stored in
diffirent memory systems separately and can be
retrieved interdependently without the effect of
retrieval information (Tulving, 2002). That is
why patients with episodic memory deficits
might still remember semantic information.
Patients with semantic dementia have difficulty
performing any task that requires semantic
knowledge. For example, picture naming.,
matching, describing words, and selecting living
or non-living creatures. On the other hand, other
cogitative systems were noneffective, such as
working memory and episodic memory
(Graham, et al 2000).
Influence of Episodic Memory on Vocabulary
Recall
There is a consensus among researchers that
acquiring vocabulary is crucial for effective
communication in an English as a Foreign
Language (EFL) setting. It has been stated that
without a strong vocabulary, no information can
be conveyed or communicated (Wilkins, 1972;
Folse, 2004). Folse (2004) also highlights the
254
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
frustration of not being able to express oneself
because of a lack of vocabulary. Several
researchers including Laufer and Nationa (2016),
Nation (1991), and Rodríguez and Sadowki
(2008) have recognized the importance of
acquiring vocabulary for the effective use of a
second language and for producing complete
spoken and written texts. In both English as a
second language (ESL) and English as a foreign
language (EFL), vocabulary acquisition is
considered crucial for all language skills,
including listening, speaking, reading, and
writing. Laufer and Nationa (2016) argued that
an adequate vocabulary is essential for successful
second language use because, without it, learners
may not be able to use the structures and
functions they have learned to communicate
effectively. Therefore, it is important for students
to continuously improve their vocabulary skills
and expand their word knowledge. For
vocabulary to be recalled easily, it has gone to
long-term memory (Cowan, 2008).
Vocabulary recall is a process of retrieving words
and their meaning. The process of vocabulary
recall involves encoding new information about
a word in the brain and storing it in memory. In
the storing stage, episodic and semantic memory
are involved; when one of them stores personal
information, another one which is semantic
stores general information. Later to retrieve
vocabulary, the cues are used to trigger recall,
searching the memory for the stored information,
decoding the retrieved information, and
rehearsing the word to consolidate the memory
(Laufer & Nationa, 2016). Different parts of the
brain are involved in each step, including the
auditory and visual cortex, the hippocampus, and
the neocortex. Rehearsal helps to strengthen the
connections between the brain regions involved
in vocabulary recall, improving future recall.
Fansury, & Januarty (2018) mentioned that
semantic and episodic memory have an effective
role in recalling vocabulary. Episodic memories
are associated with specific contextual
information. The sensory experiences and
emotions a student experiences during a lesson
become a part of the memory. These sensory and
emotional cues can be triggered when attempting
to recall the memory, but sometimes the context
is remembered more easily than the actual
information learned. Through context and
emotional cues, the actual information can be
recalled easily. However, to recall vocabulary
easily teachers must incorporate the sensory and
emotional experiences of students to remember
them easily. According to Um et al. (2012),
positive emotions can facilitate learning and
contribute to academic achievement. When
students experience positive emotions, such as
interest, enjoyment, and satisfaction, while
engaging with learning materials, they are more
likely to be motivated to learn and remember the
material.
The Theories That Support Students’
Episodic Memory to Recall Vocabulary
1. Experiential Learning Theory
Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) emphasizes
the central role that experience plays in the
learning process. It provides a holistic model of
the learning process and a multilinear model of
adult development and is based on the works of
Dewey, Lewin, and Piaget. Experiential learning
is the process whereby knowledge is created
through the transformation of experience (Kolb,
1984). ELT differentiates itself from other
learning theories by emphasizing the importance
of subjective experience in the learning process
and by providing a hands-on, participatory
approach to learning that helps students connect
new information to their own experiences.
Affective factors could affect language learners.
For example, motivation and learner autonomy
are two important factors that could affect the
process of learning a language. In language
education, it's important to help students become
independent learners (Yildiz & Yucedal, 2020).
By incorporating students' real-life experiences
into the classroom, ELT can lead to a more
meaningful and relevant learning experience,
improve engagement and motivation, and the
development of important skills such as problem-
solving, critical thinking, and collaboration
(Roberts, 2006). This theory involves four
stages: concrete experience, reflective
observation, abstract conceptualization, and
active experimentation. Concrete experience is
the direct engagement or experience in an event
or activity such as a field trip, or hand on project.
Reflective observation students will reflect and
observe the event. Abstract generalization is
students analyze the information that got from
their experience. The last step is active
experimentation. Students apply the experiment
and the theories that they have learned
throughout the direct experience (Kolb, 1984).
According to Herbet and Burt (2004), episodic
learning is in every sense experiential learning
due to capturing and storing memories in the
form of complete episodes, which include a
connected set of sensory information. This type
of learning is truly experiential, as it has a greater
impact on the student. In addition, the
Volume 12 - Issue 62
/ February 2023
255
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) has been
shown to enhance episodic memory, particularly
in the recall of vocabulary. This is because ELT
emphasizes the role of personal experience in the
learning process (Simon, et al., 2000). When
students learn vocabulary within a specific time
and context, it has been demonstrated that the
information is more likely to be encoded in long-
term memory and then subsequently retrieved
from episodic memory. By connecting new
vocabulary words to personal experiences and
actively engaging in the learning process through
hands-on and participatory experiences, students
are more likely to remember the information in
the future. ELT's four-stage process, which
includes concrete experience, reflective
observation, abstract conceptualization, and
active experimentation, provides a
comprehensive approach to learning that can aid
in the formation of strong episodic memories
(Gershman & Daw, 2017).
2. Elaboration Theory
Elaboration Theory is a cognitive learning theory
that suggests learners are more likely to
remember and recall new information when they
engage in elaborative encoding processes.
Elaborative encoding refers to the process of
creating meaningful associations between new
information and existing knowledge or
experiences. Elaboration theory was first
introduced by Charles Reigeluth, an educational
psychologist, in the 1970s. Reigeluth was
interested in understanding how learners can
create meaningful connections between new
information and their existing knowledge and
experiences, and how this process can enhance
learning and memory. According to Reigeluth,
elaboration involves learners actively engaging
with new information and transforming it in
some way to make it more meaningful and
memorable. This can involve a variety of
strategies, such as creating associations with
other concepts, asking questions to clarify
understanding, and organizing information into
meaningful categories or hierarchies (Reigeluth
& Stiein, 1983).
Reigeluth's work on elaboration theory was
influenced by earlier theories of learning, such as
Ausubel's theory of meaningful learning and
Bruner's theory of scaffolding. However,
Reigeluth expanded on these theories by
emphasizing the importance of active
engagement and transformation of information,
rather than simply acquiring it passively.
Elaboration theory has been applied in a variety
of educational contexts, including classroom
teaching, instructional design, and educational
technology. Researchers and practitioners have
developed a range of strategies for promoting
elaboration in learners, such as concept mapping,
reflective writing, and project-based learning
(Wilson & Cole, 1992).
However, elaboration theory suggests that
memory is enhanced when learners actively
engage with the material they are trying to
remember. In the case of vocabulary, this means
that students are more likely to remember a word
if they can connect it to their own experiences or
knowledge, or if they can create associations
with other words or concepts (Taylor & Hamdy,
2013). This connection between new information
and prior knowledge can be achieved through
hypermedia. Hypermedia can include text,
graphics, audio, video, and other interactive
elements, and is commonly used in educational
settings. People's professional approach to
solving problems can be arranged into
information. Professional supervision and
progress have made this feasible. Guidance
activities are individual-focused (Bilgin et al.,
2022). Teachers' biggest challenge is keeping
students' attention therefore to connect new
information with prior knowledge, teachers can
use several strategies (Kapukaya & Yildiz,
2023). Language teachers can improve
awareness, engage language knowledge, relax,
and motivate pupils by using extracurricular
activities as warm-ups. Warm-ups can be done at
the beginning, middle, and end of a language
lesson to assist pupils focus (Tosun & Yildiz,
2015). First, they can ask students to recall what
they already know about the topic before
introducing new information. Second, teachers
can relate the new information to real-life
experiences to help students understand how it
applies to their lives. Third, teachers can use
analogies and metaphors to explain new concepts
in terms of something familiar to students.
Fourth, teachers can break down new
information into smaller, more manageable
pieces that build on students' prior knowledge.
Finally, teachers can provide opportunities for
students to reflect on what they have learned and
how it connects to their prior knowledge, which
can help to reinforce the connections and make
the information more memorable (Hoffman,
1997).
Discussion
Theories of experiential learning and elaboration
theory both support the idea that students'
episodic memory can be enhanced when learning
vocabulary. Experiential learning theory (ELT)
256
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
emphasizes the importance of connecting new
information to personal experience and provides
a hands-on approach to learning. ELT suggests
that by engaging in a four-stage process that
includes concrete experience, reflective
observation, abstract conceptualization, and
active experimentation, students are more likely
to remember the information. ELT has been
shown to enhance episodic memory, particularly
in the recall of vocabulary.
Elaboration theory suggests that memory is
enhanced when learners actively engage with the
material they are trying to remember. For
vocabulary, this means that students are more
likely to remember a word if they can connect it
to their own experiences or knowledge, or if they
can create associations with other words or
concepts. This connection between new
information and prior knowledge can be
achieved through strategies such as concept
mapping, reflective writing, and project-based
learning. Hence, prior knowledge aids learning.
Teaching new concepts using students' prior
knowledge improves engagement and critical
thinking. Learning requires building on prior
knowledge (Yildiz & Celik, 2020).
Both theories suggest that students need to be
actively engaged in the learning process to
enhance their episodic memory of vocabulary.
This can be achieved by incorporating real-life
experiences into the classroom, using interactive
multimedia tools, and creating associations with
prior knowledge. By enhancing episodic
memory, students are more likely to remember
vocabulary in the long term, which can improve
their communication skills and academic
performance.
In conclusion, experiential learning theory and
elaboration theory both offer valuable insights
into how students' episodic memory can be
enhanced to recall vocabulary. These theories
emphasize the importance of active engagement,
personal experience, and meaningful
connections between new information and prior
knowledge. By incorporating these principles
into teaching practices, educators can enhance
students' episodic memory and improve their
ability to recall vocabulary.
Conclusions
The neuroscience of semantic and episodic
memory and the theories of experiential learning
and elaboration provide valuable insights into
how to enhance students' episodic memory for
vocabulary recall. Episodic and semantic
memory play a crucial role in learning and
vocabulary acquisition, which in turn impacts
effective communication and academic
performance of students. Both theories
emphasize the importance of active engagement,
personal experience, and meaningful
connections between new information and prior
knowledge in the learning process.
To improve students' episodic memory for
vocabulary recall, educators can incorporate
pedagogical practices based on experiential
learning theory and elaboration theory. These
practices may include connecting new words and
concepts to personal experiences, using
interactive multimedia tools, and encouraging
the creation of associations with prior
knowledge. By doing so, educators can help
students consolidate information into their
episodic memories, which facilitates long-term
retention and retrieval of vocabulary.
Bibliographic references
Collins, A., & Quillian, R. (1967). Retrieval
Time From Semantic Memory. Journal of
verbal learning and verbal behavior, 8(2),
240-247.
Baddeley, A. (2001). The concept of Eposodic
Memory. Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society of London, 356(1413),
1345-1350.
Bilgin, R., Yildiz, Y., & Yildiz, A. (2022). A
Review of the Aims and Principles of
Guidance Activities in Schools. International
Journal of Social Sciences & Educational
Studies, 9(3), 29-38.
Brigard, F. D., Umanath, S., & Irish, M. (2022).
Rethinking the distinction between episodic
and semantic memory: Insights from the past,
present, and future. The Psychonomic
Society, 50(3), 459-463.
Conway, M. A., Cohen, G., & Stanhope, N.
(1992). Very long-term memory for
knowledge acquired at school and university.
Cognative Phsycology, 6(6), 467-482.
Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences
between long-term, short-term, and working
memory? Progress in brain, 169, 323-388.
Debra M. B. Herbert, J. S. (2001). Memory
awareness and schematization: learning in the
university context. Cognative Phsychology,
15(6), 617-637.
Fansury, A. H., & Januarty, R. (2018). Brain
Writing Learning Model Using Episodic
Memory In Teaching Narrative Text.
Exposure Journal.
García-Lázaro, H. G., Ramirez-Carmona, R.,
Lara-Romero, R., & Roldan-Valadez, E.
Volume 12 - Issue 62
/ February 2023
257
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
(2012). Neuroanatomy of episodic and
semantic memory in humans: A brief review
of neuroimaging studies. Neorology India,
60(6), 613-617.
Gershman, S. J., & Daw, N. D. (2017).
Einforcement Learning and Episodic
Memory in Humans and Animals: An
Integrative Framework. Annual Review of
Psychology, 68, 101-118.
Graham, K. S., Simons, J. S., Pratta, K. H.,
Patterso, K., & Hodges, J. R. (2000). Insights
from semantic dementia on the relationship
between episodic and semantic memory.
Neuropsychologia, 38(3), 313-324.
Herbert, D. M., & Burt, J. S. (2004). What do
students remember? Episodic memory and
the development of schematization. Applied
Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal
of the Society for Applied Research in
Memory and Cognition, 18(1), 77-88.
Hoffman, S. (1997). Elaboration Theory and
Hypermedia: Is There a Link? Educational
technology, 37(1), 57-64.
Jones, M. N., Willits, W., & Dennis, S. (2014).
Models of semantic memory. The Oxford
handbook of computational and
mathematical psychology (pp. 232254).
Oxford University Press.
Kapukaya, K., & Yildiz, Y. (2023). Human
Factor in Teaching: Teacher Perspective-I.
International Journal of Social Sciences &
Educational Studies, 10(1), 308.
Kolb, D. (1984). The process of experiential
learning. Experiential learning: Experience as
the source of learning and development,
20-38.
Laufer, B., & Nationa, P. (2016). A vocabulary-
size test of controlled productive ability.
Languge and Testing, 16(1), 33-51.
Martin, A., & Chao, L. L. (2001). Semantic
memory and the brain: structure and
processes. Current opinion in neurobiology,
194-201.
Nation, P. (1991). Teaching and learning
vocabulary. Asian EFL Journal.
Nikolaev, A. R., InêsBramão, Johansson, R., &
Johanssona, M. (2023). Episodic memory
formation in unrestricted viewing.
Neurolamge.
Richard, A., & & Shiffrin, R. M. (1979). Human
Memory: A Proposed System and Its Control
Processes. Annual review of psychology,
63-102.
Roberts, G. (2006). A philosophical examination
of experiential learning theory for
agricultural educators. Agricultural
Education, 47(1), 17-29.
Rodríguez, M., & Sadowki, M. (2008). Effects of
Rote, Context, Keyword, and
Context/Keyword Methods on Retention of
Vocabulary in EFL Classrooms. Language
Learning, 50(2), 385-412.
Simon, H. A., Anderson, J. R., & Reder, J. G.
(2000). Perspectives on Learning, Thinking,
and Activity. Educational Resarch, 29(4),
11-13.
Tosun, M., & Yildiz, Y. (2015). Extracurricular
activities as warm-ups in language teaching.
International Journal of Social Sciences &
Educational Studies, 2(1).
Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic
memory. England : Clareendo Press.
Tulving, E. (2002). Eiposdic Memory: From
Mind to Brain. Annual Review of
Psychology, 53(1), 1-25.
Yildiz, Y., & Celik, B. (2020). The use of
scaffolding techniques in language learning:
Extending the level of understanding.
International Journal of Social Sciences &
Educational Studies, 7(3), 148-153.
Yildiz, Y., & Yucedal, H. M. (2020). Learner
autonomy: A central theme in language
learning. International Journal of Social
Sciences & Educational Studies, 7(3),
208-212.