involved in intercultural communication
especially at the level of the educational
institution, and regional government etc. The
purposes and levels of self-regulation (self-
organisation, self-management and self-control)
define the selection of the correct strategy or
strategies. They may include monologues
(imperative or manipulative) and dialogues.]
If an imperative monologue strategy is selected
(Hosseini Fatemi et al., 2016), then the instructor
determines the goal and communicates it to the
students. Thus, the educational process is built
around it. This strategy is commonly applied
when studying norms, which require performing
specific operations, or when the sequence of
steps cannot be disrupted. Work with official
documents can be an excellent example of such a
strategy. Additionally, the strategy for the
management of the audience during lecturing is
considered imperative if the instructor does not
check up on the response and understanding of
the students.
A manipulative monologue strategy (Zhukova et
al., 2022) is different as it is the instructor who
defines the path to the achievement of the goals.
In this case, the instructor refers to the goals of a
specific educational stage for consistency and
compares them to the actual goals of the students.
The instructor evaluates whether the students’
level complies with the requirements set by the
educational process for this specific stage. In
addition, the instructor takes into account the
nature of the relationship among the students in
the group. The instructor creates the environment
required for the achievement of the goal, which
may be either not clear or partially obvious to the
students at the start. The ‘manipulative strategy’
of interaction implies that the instructor presents
the sequence of stages and level of difficulty of a
specific task. For instance, in the case of a
research project, if the goal of each step is not
linked to the goals of the educational process, the
instructor may change the sequence or content of
the steps at any time if the situation calls for such
changes.
The dialogue strategy (Vaira, 2007; Vargas,
2000) may be effective if both the instructor and
the students have established an atmosphere of
mutual trust. In the case of the pseudo-dialogue
strategy, the instructor defines the goal of
interaction, but in the course of studying the
instructor facilitates work in groups (question
and answer sessions or similar), discussions, case
studies, etc. The instructor acts as the advisor,
generally, at the request of the group. Given that
the goal complies with the educational
programme, the instructor can present a list of
potential goals to the group or specify the subject
of the next stage of the educational programme,
thus, passing on a new level of understanding the
current pedagogical task.
The next strategy describes and defines the
continuous nature of preparation for intercultural
communication driven by the significance of
bringing together various social cultures. This, in
its turn, drives society towards tolerance, an
integration of different educational systems, and
a search for new ways of interaction and
optimisation of preparation. The following
highlighted levels articulate the findings of this
research article:
➢ The first (low) level reflects the acquisition
and adoption of conventional fundamentals
of intercultural communication. This level
reveals various inconsistencies and defines
the necessary psychological and pedagogical
set of tools required to optimise the
preparation process through developing
solutions to professional tasks.
➢ The second (medium) level includes
innovative prospects of arrangement of
intercultural communication defined by the
regulatory process. It allows for the critical
analysis of the prevailing norm in terms of
the new prospects and identification of
opportunities for further development and
implementation through role-play.
➢ The third (high) level describes the ability to
implement changes into the system of
preparation for intercultural communication
(educational programmes, chain of
educational institutions, organisational
structure of regulatory bodies within the
educational system). The dialectical
rejection of the second level paves the way
for the transition to the third level. It is
featured by the development of a clearer
understanding of the substantial number of
internal contradictions within the system
necessary for the initiation of the transition
process. In other words, differentiation has
become a crucial component in the process.
This includes the ability of the education to
break the continuous flow of information
and go beyond the established routine. It
means that education should be capable of
predicting and evaluating various problems
and working out appropriate solutions based
on its values and fundamental principles.
Any problem should be viewed as an
opportunity for further development through
network-based mixed interaction.