Shchur (Щур Г. С.) devoted himself to the study
of the basic theory of field division of labor in
linguistics, with special attention to the
functional semantic field. He pointed out the use
of functional semantics for "field" research. The
advantages of studying with this method are:
firstly, the "field" is regarded as a spatial
phenomenon; secondly, not only the function of
language units, but also the common semantic
features of language units are considered
(Shchur, 1974:66). In other words, unlike other
fields, the functional semantic field is based on
two criteria—functionality and semantics.
Therefore, the functional semantic field is
defined as "a multi-level system of expressions
that reflects the unity of functions and the
interaction between functions in a language
based on a certain semantic category"
(Bondarko,1984:21-22).
The purpose of the paper is to identify the variety
of the spatial orientational category in modern
Russian and Chinese languages, to determine
similarities and differences in the expression of
this category, to classify the ways of expression
in methodological purposes for predicting and
preventing possible interference in the speech of
the Chinese students.
Literature review
According to Bondarko (Бондарко А.В.), there
are two main structural types of functional
semantic fields: monocentric fields with the same
grammaticalized structure and polycentric fields
without the same structure but with the same
specific characteristics. Among them, the core
structure of the polycentric field can be
composed of several linguistic structures. Any
functional semantic field is a subsystem in the
language structure, and each language unit in the
system has common semantic features and has
the characteristics of semantic commonality. The
structure of functional semantic field is divided
into core field, transition field and fringe field
(Popova et al., 1989: 6).
According to the characteristics of semantic
categories, Bondarko divided functional
semantic fields into four categories: predicate
functional semantic field, subject-object
functional semantic field, quality-quantitative
functional semantic field, and sparse functional
semantic field (Bondarko, 2002:35). The spatial
functional semantic field belongs to the predicate
functional semantic field. As a special language
system, it has a complex language structure, and
its constituent elements are connected by
semantic categories and syntactic relations. The
functional semantic field is a multi-dimensional,
huge and ordered aggregate of language units,
and one of its main characteristics is to
completely include language units into the
aggregate of language units through the same
semantic category. The spatial functional
semantic field is mainly composed of the
locational functional semantic field and the
directional functional semantic field. This paper
mainly studies the functional semantic field of
Russian-Chinese spatial orientation and its
composition, and compares and analyzes the
similarities and differences of language
expressions in each subfield of the two-language
spatial directional functional semantic fields.
According to Bondarko's functional semantic
field theory, we divide the directional functional
semantic field into core field, transition field and
fringe field.
The materials and methods
We selected the corpus from the Russian State
Corpus and the BCC Corpus of Peking
University. According to the sampling method,
we extracted 1000 corpora from the two corpora
respectively, searched for the corpus expressing
the structure of the spatial direction functional
semantic field in these 1000 corpora, analyzed
the proportion of each expression type in the
field, and then based on these corpora. The
proportion of the corpus in the 1000 corpus is
calculated to calculate the number of entries for
each expression means in each functional
semantic field in the corpus. To this end, we use
data analysis and comparative methods to
explore the functional semantic field of Russian-
Chinese spatial orientation.
Results and Discussion
Functional Semantic Field of Russian Spatial
Orientation
Guided by Bondarko's functional semantic field
theory, we constructed a functional semantic
field of Russian spatial orientation. Its core field,
transition field and fringe field are as follows:
1. Core field
The expression means of the core field in
functional semantic field of Russian spatial
orientation is the spatial preposition structure that
expresses the orientational meaning. Among
them, "в", "на", "под", "за", "к", "из", "с", "от",
"до", "по" and other prepositions are the most
typical symbolic words for orientation.