colleges, and the study came out with results,
including: the causes of extremism are the
weakness of religious scruples, the absence of a
good role models, the spread of the phenomenon
of unemployment, the absence of societal justice,
the spread of bribes and embezzlement, and the
low economic level. The study proposed methods
to confront extremism, including: attention to
student activities, political practice, activating
religious culture, seeking justice, and developing
the spirit of belonging.
Almareb (2009) conducted a study with the aim
of identifying the phenomenon of educational
and intellectual extremism among students. The
study consisted of 418 students from the Faculty
of Education at the University of Hail. The study
reached a number of results, the most important
of which are: the highest degrees of extremism
were with regard to the political, then religious,
economic and educational aspects. The study
also showed that there were no statistically
significant differences in the response of the
study sample with regard to the phenomenon of
intellectual and educational extremism according
to the difference in the student's annual rate or his
socio-economic level.
Also, the study of Alasali (2010) sought to
identify the degree of prevalence of
manifestations of extremism in religion among
Palestinian university students from the point of
view of university professors, the causes of the
phenomenon, and the suggestion of a treatment
formula for it. The study sample consisted of
(157) university professors. The researcher used
the descriptive approach, the interview and the
questionnaire to collect data, and the study
showed that the psychological field came in the
first place, while the human relations came in the
second and last place. The results also showed
that there were no statistically significant
differences in the degree of manifestations
prevalence of extremism among students due to
the difference in the variables of gender,
university and specialization. The results showed
statistically significant differences attributed to
the academic degree in favor of the PhD. The
study also showed that the most important
reasons for extremism are the economic
blockade, split between people, partisanship,
ignorance of the provisions of Sharia, intolerance
of opinion, lack of recognition of the other
opinion, and lack of communication between
scholars and youth.
The study of Alrababa (2014) aimed to show the
role of Jordanian universities in confronting the
phenomenon of terrorism, and the study sample
was the deans of student affairs in Jordanian
universities. The researcher used the descriptive
analytical approach, and the interview was a data
collection instrument. The study found a number
of results, including: that universities have a role
in confronting terrorism, reaching 33 roles, the
most important of which are: instilling the correct
belief in the hearts of students, raising awareness
of terrorism dangers, raising awareness of how to
deal with the media to clarify the difference
between good and bad, including courses in the
study curricula on terrorism, and instilling
spiritual and moral values. The study
recommended that there should be a meeting of
the deans of student affairs in Jordanian
universities to develop a unified plan to confront
terrorism.
Also, the study of Alsayad (2019) conducted a
study with the aim of identifying how the
university confronts intellectual extremism from
the point of view of university students. The
study sample consisted of 301 male and female
students from Kafr El-Sheikh University in
Egypt. Using the questionnaire, the study
reached a number of results, the most important
of which is that intellectual extremism has a
number of negative effects on society, such as
destabilization, and the spread of chaos and panic
among people. The study also showed that one of
the most prominent causes of intellectual
extremism is the weakness of national belonging,
intellectual ignorance and religious fanaticism.
Alqudah and Ashour (2019) conducted a study in
Jordan with the aim of identifying the role of the
faculties of Sharia and Education in confronting
religious extremism among undergraduate
students in Jordanian universities. Applying the
questionnaire instrument on 262 faculty
members at the university, and interviewing 15
educational leaders from the deans and heads of
departments in the faculties of Sharia and
Education in Jordanian universities, the study
reached a number of results, including: the
degree of facing the faculties of Sharia and
Education to religious extremism among its
students came to a medium degree, and the lack
of political and financial support for these
faculties and the absence of a clear plan,
mechanism and methodology in confronting this
extremism were among the most prominent
barriers facing these faculties in carrying out
their role in confronting this extremism among its
students.