internal audit are components of the internal
control of the enterprise. At the same time,
compliance professionals are primarily
concerned with compliance risks, which cover, in
particular, the field of corporate ethics, business
reputation of the entity.
In the article of Pererva, Kobeleva, & Romanchik
(2018), compliance is used to denote the
continuous efforts of the enterprise to comply
with the requirements of legislation, rules,
standards of corporate governance. As a result of
the study, the authors found that compliance
should guide all levels of management,
regardless of position. It was also found that
compliance is a complex phenomenon that can be
considered as an ideology, a tool of control, the
principles of management.
Kovalishin (2019), in his study, analyzed the
concept of corporate compliance-based on
foreign experience and prospects for its
application in Ukraine. Accordingly, the study
found that corporate compliance refers to
activities related to monitoring compliance with
officials and employees of the law, local
regulations of regulatory, non-regulatory nature
in companies.
Zadek (2007) reviewed five levels of corporate
responsibility, one of which is compliance. Using
the example of Nike, the author demonstrates
how the company builds a policy of corporate
responsibility from denying the facts of the
offense to higher standards of ethical business.
The author concludes that compliance with the
rules of ethical business is an important factor in
the success and profitability of the company, a
necessary criterion for its activities in our time.
In their work, Chen & Bouvain (2009) attempted
to overcome the methods of analysis of non-
financial reporting of large corporations
available at the time of writing. For example,
they note that the frequency and volume of
reporting do not reflect the quality of the audit
and compliance. From this, the authors conclude
that the application of more rigorous statistical
and textual analytical methods, in particular,
content analysis, should overcome these
shortcomings and demonstrate real compliance
with large business entities.
Rasche (2010), in his article, criticizes the
standardization of corporate responsibility as a
panacea for any future offenses. To argue his
position, the author uses the tools of analysis of
the concept of justice, proposed by Jacques
Derrida, and concludes that when deciding on the
application of corporate responsibility,
judgments should always take into account the
specifics of the situation, i.e., each time should
be individual.
Carroll, Lipartito, Post, Werhane, & Goodpaster
(2012) conducted a thorough analysis of the
development of the institution of corporate
responsibility in the United States. The book
covers the period from 1776 to 2011, thus
demonstrating the theoretical and philosophical
basis of corporate responsibility, which was later
embodied in regulations and rules of doing
business. The guide contains useful links to
articles on corporate responsibility, contains a
large amount of numerical information presented
in the form of tables, can serve as a foundation
for research on the history of corporate
responsibility in the United States.
Ghobadian, Money, & Hillenbrand (2015), in
their research, examine the study of corporate
responsibility. They first demonstrate how this
concept has been explained in the past, how it has
affected how corporate responsibility is studied
now, and what the prospects for future research
are. For example, the authors conclude that the
use of developments in the field of psychology
can help improve corporate governance practices
and help make corporate responsibility more
flexible in application.
Arenas & Ayuso (2016), in their work, propose
to consider the institute of corporate social
responsibility in terms of the activities of
multinational companies. The authors note that
typical for this institute measures to improve the
skills of employees in the field of corporate
responsibility, ethics, behavior, as well as an
inclusive decision-making process when the
opinion of all participants is heard before making
a final decision that positively affects its quality.
Methodology
We used the system-functional method to
demonstrate compliance in the form of a system
of measures to comply with the law, rules,
requirements, standards of doing business,
ethical standards. This means that compliance as
a phenomenon is a set of tools aimed at
counteracting negative factors and supporting
positive factors such as brilliant business
reputation, perfect audit, compliance with ethical
standards in the company, non-discrimination,
gender balance, lack of corruption, and more.
Compliance is also associated with other
concepts that can be considered components,
such as compliance risk, compliance control,
compliance plan, compliance ideology,